Louisiana Tech Lady Techsters
2023 Team Stats (4 games)
59.8
PPG
61.2
Opp
-1.4
Margin
39.4%
FG%
21.6%
3P%
84.8%
FT%
34.8
RPG
13.0
APG
13.8
TO
75.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1125 (#109) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1189 (#88) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +22.8 (#127) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.704 (#115) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | vs | Illinois State Redbirds | L | 53 - 70 |
| 2022-12-12 | vs | South Alabama Jaguars | W | 73 - 50 |
| 2023-02-25 | vs | Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders | L | 59 - 61 |
| 2023-03-09 | @ | UTEP Miners | L | 54 - 64 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Walker
|
G | 4 | 24.0 | 13.8 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 12.2 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 30.6 | 37.5 | 88.0 | - | 45.8 | 33.7 |
A. Roberson
|
F | 4 | 25.5 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 9.5 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 44.7 | 0.0 | 92.3 | - | 52.6 | 44.7 |
R. Lee
|
G | 4 | 19.8 | 9.5 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 43.3 | 33.3 | 73.3 | - | 51.9 | 45.0 |
A. Brannon
|
G | 2 | 27.5 | 9.5 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 8.5 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 52.9 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 53.1 | 52.9 |
G. Green
|
G | 4 | 16.0 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 50.0 | 80.0 | - | 77.9 | 75.0 |
M. Wurm
|
F | 4 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 47.4 | 43.8 |
S. Nativi
|
G | 4 | 27.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 46.2 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 53.8 | 53.8 |
A. Bukvic
|
G | 2 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 51.0 | 40.0 |
S. Bates
|
G | 4 | 27.2 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 18.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 23.7 | 18.8 |
K. Thompson
|
F | 3 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
A. Smith
|
G | 2 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
L. Sant
|
G | 4 | 24.0 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 13.3 | 13.3 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
A. Angoi
|
F | 2 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG