Lincoln (CA)
Also known as: Lincoln (CA)
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.388 (#499) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.621 (#338) | AdjNet +4.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.618 (#337) | AdjNet +4.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.545 (#335) | AdjO 68.1 | AdjD 66.1 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | @ | Claremont-M-S | W | 75 - 68 |
| 2023-11-17 | @ | Texas Lutheran | L | 64 - 81 |
| 2024-02-11 | @ | UC Santa Cruz | W | 58 - 56 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Claude | - | 1 | 36.0 | 25.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 18.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 16.7 | 85.7 | - | 51.7 | 36.1 |
| S TE-NANA WILLIAMS | - | 1 | 37.0 | 14.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 21.0 | 10 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 40.0 | 100.0 | 83.3 | 0.4 | 55.4 | 45.0 |
| Safenunuiva Te-Nana Williams | - | 1 | 27.0 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 7.0 | 10 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 45.5 | 50.0 | 42.9 | 0.4 | 49.7 | 50.0 |
| Senaida Barrientos | - | 2 | 34.5 | 12.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 11.5 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 0 | 91.7 | - | 61.6 | 46.7 |
| Arielle Hines | - | 2 | 25.5 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 10.5 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 38.1 | 40.0 | 50.0 | - | 43.9 | 42.9 |
| Kristina Yomane | - | 1 | 24.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 38.3 | 40.0 |
| Jolie Aguirre | - | 2 | 16.5 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 16.7 | 80.0 | - | 48.5 | 27.8 |
| S. Williams | - | 1 | 26.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | -1.0 | 10 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 0.4 | 25.6 | 12.5 |
| Ranaye Manu | - | 2 | 14.0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 33.5 | 30.0 |
| Lirda Ndona | - | 2 | 25.0 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 11.1 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 25.3 | 16.7 |
| Aubree Lewis | - | 2 | 11.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| ANGEL COLE | - | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -32 | -4.0 | -4.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 |
| DIANA KRAMMER | - | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Julianna Martinez | - | 1 | 28.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Angela Olive | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG