Lenoir-Rhyne
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1119 (#41) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1151 (#52) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +6.1 (#134) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.707 (#287) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.572 (#199) | NetEff +2.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.753 (#296) | AdjNet +9.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.758 (#299) | AdjNet +9.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.650 (#289) | AdjO 70.7 | AdjD 63.9 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | @ | USC Aiken | W | 70 - 47 |
| 2024-11-10 | @ | Lander | L | 54 - 70 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Carson-Newman | L | 72 - 92 |
| 2024-11-20 | @ | Newberry | L | 53 - 61 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Emory & Henry | W | 76 - 59 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Wingate | L | 55 - 68 |
| 2024-11-30 | vs | UVA Wise | W | 77 - 75 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Catawba | L | 56 - 61 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Tusculum | W | 91 - 78 |
| 2024-12-14 | vs | Belmont Abbey | L | 49 - 77 |
| 2024-12-18 | vs | Coker | L | 65 - 71 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | King (TN) | W | 82 - 55 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Lincoln Memorial | L | 50 - 63 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Mars Hill | L | 66 - 77 |
| 2025-01-12 | @ | UVA Wise | L | 79 - 84 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Anderson (SC) | W | 67 - 65 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Emory & Henry | W | 87 - 68 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Limestone | L | 56 - 65 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Tusculum | W | 82 - 79 |
| 2025-01-29 | @ | Wingate | L | 60 - 67 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Carson-Newman | W | 69 - 58 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Coker | L | 40 - 57 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Mars Hill | W | 72 - 68 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Anderson (SC) | L | 58 - 63 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Lincoln Memorial | L | 61 - 68 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Limestone | W | 60 - 58 |
| 2025-02-26 | vs | Catawba | L | 52 - 53 |
| 2025-03-01 | vs | Newberry | W | 73 - 64 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blaikley Crooks | - | 27 | 29.4 | 13.3 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 10.1 | 10.2 | - | - | - | 45.6 | 24.4 | 89.3 | 0.02 | 55.7 | 47.4 |
| Alexandra Merceron | - | 27 | 20.5 | 12.4 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 10.9 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 46.1 | 20.0 | 70.9 | -0.31 | 50.2 | 46.3 |
| Emily Harman | - | 28 | 32.4 | 11.8 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.7 | 6.3 | - | - | - | 40.1 | 37.7 | 87.0 | -0.46 | 51.5 | 48.3 |
| Tilda Lindstrom | - | 28 | 28.2 | 8.2 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 7.4 | 9.6 | - | - | - | 40.6 | 30.9 | 77.4 | -0.16 | 52.1 | 49.8 |
| Vanessa Jurewicz | - | 28 | 18.9 | 6.6 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 6.8 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 39.2 | 28.0 | 59.0 | -0.01 | 44.9 | 42.9 |
| Sarah Burton | - | 28 | 21.0 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 85 | 8.5 | 7.7 | 36.4 | 31.1 | 66.7 | 0.09 | 47.9 | 44.5 |
| Maleiya Hill | - | 28 | 25.5 | 4.1 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 5.3 | 33 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 37.9 | 27.6 | 70.0 | 0.87 | 49.1 | 42.1 |
| Gabby Bush | - | 27 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | -32 | -1.2 | -2.4 | 47.2 | 37.5 | 72.7 | -0.48 | 55.0 | 50.0 |
| Sofia Mendez | - | 27 | 6.9 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 41.9 | 34.6 | 62.5 | 0.15 | 53.7 | 52.3 |
| Emma Pendleton | - | 27 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | -23 | -1.0 | -4.7 | 41.2 | 0 | 25.0 | 0.22 | 39.0 | 41.2 |
| Jayda Glass | - | 25 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 25.0 | 100.0 | -0.15 | 36.8 | 30.0 |
| Abby Wrede | - | 26 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | -0.1 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Olivia Miller | - | 26 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 52.1 | 50.0 |
| Alex Bennon | - | 21 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 38.7 | 33.3 |
| Nevaeh Johnson | - | 26 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.0 | -49 | -2.0 | -2.8 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Makayla Stokes | - | 26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | -17 | -1.7 | -2.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Taylor Romano | - | 25 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Megan Landsiedel | - | 10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.97 | 0 | 0 |
| Janiesia Stokes | - | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -104 | -3.6 | -7.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.59 | 0 | 0 |
| Bella Sims | - | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG