🐻⬇️🏀

Lamar

Season: 2026-2027 2025-2026 2024-2025 2023-2024 2022-2023 2021-2022 2020-2021 2019-2020 2018-2019 2017-2018
Also known as: Lamar Cardinals
Program History
Coach: A'Quonesia Krashun Franklin

2026-2027 Team Stats (2 games)

84.0
PPG
57.0
Opp
+27.0
Margin
43.1%
FG%
37.5%
3P%
60.3%
FT%
41.5
RPG
16.0
APG
16.5
TO
80.8
Est. poss./game
61.9
Adj PPG
65.1
Adj Opp PPG
#179
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 1006 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1011, returning +45, transfers -50, freshmen +0 More → 969 (#179) Preseason prior 1006 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1011, returning +45, transfers -50, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +190 elo More → 996 (#159) HCA +190 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +189 elo More → 995 (#168) HCA +189 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.8 More → -5.3 (#218) HCA +3.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.8 More → -5.4 (#221) HCA +3.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.362 (#183) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -9.1 More → 0.452 (#182) AdjNet -9.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -9.0 More → 0.450 (#180) AdjNet -9.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 61.9 | AdjD 65.1 More → 0.479 (#179) AdjO 61.9 | AdjD 65.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 62.0 | AdjD 65.2 More → 0.478 (#177) AdjO 62.0 | AdjD 65.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.445 (#182) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.445 (#183) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 216 | GP 1 More → 981 (#177) RD 216 | GP 1
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More → 0.456 (#173) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 vs Louisiana Christian Wildcats W 104 - 35
2026-11-05 @ UT Arlington Mavericks L 64 - 79
2026-11-09 @ Texas Tech Lady Raiders - Preview
2026-11-12 vs Arlington Baptist Patriots - Preview
2026-11-16 @ Texas A&M Aggies - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kennedi Alexander Kennedi Alexander G 2 19.0 18.0 5.0 0.5 1.5 0.5 2.0 11.5 12.0 21 2 10.5 22.3 60.9 33.3 75.0 -1.05 67.9 65.2
Shaila Forman Shaila Forman G 2 30.0 14.0 7.5 3.5 3.0 0.5 3.0 12.5 13.0 36 2 18.0 24.1 36.0 50.0 71.4 2.44 49.9 46.0
Solenne Olenga Solenne Olenga F 2 23.5 14.0 9.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 7.0 17.0 28 2 14.0 24.0 71.4 0 47.1 -0.3 65.2 71.4
Jada Graves Jada Graves G 2 25.0 7.0 0.5 3.5 2.0 0.0 1.5 7.0 4.5 33 2 16.5 26.6 28.6 20.0 83.3 0.3 42.1 32.1
Larissa Hubbard Larissa Hubbard G 2 15.0 7.0 4.5 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 4.5 9.0 24 2 12.0 32.3 55.6 0 66.7 1.25 60.1 55.6
Kamryn Wilson Kamryn Wilson G 2 31.5 6.5 5.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 3.0 10.5 1.0 30 2 15.0 19.1 19.0 33.3 50.0 0.65 28.6 26.2
Brooklyn Alexander Brooklyn Alexander G 1 22.0 6.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 8.0 - - - - 40.0 0.0 100.0 - 51.0 40.0
Jacei Denley Jacei Denley G 2 26.5 5.5 1.5 2.5 2.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 4.5 21 2 10.5 15.9 33.3 66.7 50.0 0.28 42.7 41.7
Jordan Pete Jordan Pete G 2 11.0 5.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 1.5 26 2 13.0 45.3 50.0 33.3 0.0 0.46 53.6 62.5
Kyndall Roberts Kyndall Roberts G 2 7.5 4.0 2.5 2.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 16 2 8.0 39.3 50.0 0 66.7 -0.35 54.6 50.0
Te'Sani Green Te'Sani Green C 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Keyiona McDaniel Keyiona McDaniel G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Molly Powell Molly Powell F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

137 located field-goal attempts in 2 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Olenga28% Graves20% Alexander100% Alexander100% Alexander50% Pete50% Denley67% Forman67% Forman100% Wilson60%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Wilson33% Forman23% Denley50% Alexander100% Denley29% Alexander67% Pete33% Forman57% Wilson67% Graves44%
Misses: who misses most here

Kennedi AlexanderShaila FormanSolenne OlengaKamryn WilsonJacei DenleyJordan PeteJada Graves

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 29-50 58.0 58 Solenne Olenga 28% (16 pts) Kennedi Alexander 21% (12 pts) Kamryn Wilson 33% (7 misses) Shaila Forman 14% (3 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 10-32 31.2 20 Jada Graves 20% (4 pts) Kennedi Alexander 20% (4 pts) Shaila Forman 23% (5 misses) Kamryn Wilson 18% (4 misses)
Mid-range left 1-3 33.3 2 Kennedi Alexander 100% (2 pts) - Jacei Denley 50% (1 misses) Shaila Forman 50% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 2-3 66.7 4 Kennedi Alexander 100% (4 pts) - Kennedi Alexander 100% (1 misses) -
Mid-range right 2-9 22.2 4 Kennedi Alexander 50% (2 pts) Shaila Forman 50% (2 pts) Jacei Denley 29% (2 misses) Shaila Forman 29% (2 misses)
Left corner 3 2-5 40.0 6 Jordan Pete 50% (3 pts) Kennedi Alexander 50% (3 pts) Kennedi Alexander 67% (2 misses) Jordan Pete 33% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 3-6 50.0 9 Jacei Denley 67% (6 pts) Shaila Forman 33% (3 pts) Jordan Pete 33% (1 misses) Kamryn Wilson 33% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 3-10 30.0 9 Shaila Forman 67% (6 pts) Kennedi Alexander 33% (3 pts) Shaila Forman 57% (4 misses) Jordan Pete 14% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 center 2-5 40.0 6 Shaila Forman 100% (6 pts) - Kamryn Wilson 67% (2 misses) Shaila Forman 33% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 right 5-14 35.7 15 Kamryn Wilson 60% (9 pts) Jada Graves 20% (3 pts) Jada Graves 44% (4 misses) Kamryn Wilson 22% (2 misses)