La Salle
2026-2027 Team Stats (3 games)
Model Outputs
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 969 (#183) | Preseason prior 993 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1058, returning -10, transfers -56, freshmen +0 |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 967 (#190) | HCA +169 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 967 (#194) | HCA +169 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -2.4 (#182) | HCA +1.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -2.5 (#183) | HCA +1.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.321 (#199) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.417 (#192) | AdjNet -5.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.427 (#188) | AdjNet -4.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.401 (#216) | AdjO 58.8 | AdjD 65.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.399 (#219) | AdjO 58.8 | AdjD 65.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.425 (#191) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.425 (#191) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 970 (#186) | RD 178 | GP 3 |
| Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. More → | 0.425 (#184) | Chronological component blend with rest and venue. |
Rank through the season
League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.
2026-2027 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | @ | Rutgers Scarlet Knights | L | 62 - 75 |
| 2026-11-07 | vs | Loyola Maryland Greyhounds | W | 69 - 61 |
| 2026-11-11 | vs | Temple Owls | L | 67 - 89 |
| 2026-11-15 | @ | Virginia Tech Hokies | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-18 | vs | Rowan Profs | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-21 | @ | American University Eagles | - | Preview |
2026-2027 Roster
Estimated Minutes by Position
Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joan Quinn
|
G | 2 | 28.5 | 14.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 9.5 | 10.5 | -11 | 3 | -3.7 | -5.2 | 36.8 | 0.0 | 93.3 | 1.24 | 54.7 | 36.8 |
Tiana Thompson
|
G | 2 | 27.0 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 15.5 | -20 | 3 | -6.7 | -8.9 | 46.7 | 33.3 | 43.8 | -0.53 | 52.2 | 53.3 |
Vivien Nejašmić
|
G | 2 | 33.5 | 11.0 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 12.0 | 6.5 | -9 | 3 | -3.0 | -4.0 | 37.5 | 33.3 | 22.2 | 0.45 | 39.3 | 41.7 |
Amiya Moses
|
F | 2 | 21.0 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 11.0 | -13 | 3 | -4.3 | -8.3 | 42.9 | 0.0 | 16.7 | -1.29 | 39.1 | 42.9 |
Olivia Ostoni
|
G | 2 | 15.0 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | -8 | 3 | -2.7 | -6.0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 100.0 | -0.07 | 55.8 | 44.4 |
Kiara Williams
|
F | 2 | 21.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | - | 21.4 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 28.5 | 21.4 |
Emilia Coleman
|
G | 2 | 19.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 9.5 | -0.5 | -16 | 3 | -5.3 | -10.4 | 15.8 | 6.2 | 100.0 | -0.98 | 22.6 | 18.4 |
Sophi Hutchison
|
G | 2 | 10.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | -20 | 3 | -6.7 | -24.0 | 40.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | -2.16 | 51.0 | 50.0 |
Lauren Patnode
|
G | 2 | 15.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | -13 | 2 | -6.5 | -16.9 | 25.0 | 28.6 | 0 | -2.06 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
Zynaye Henry
|
G | 2 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -0.5 | -19 | 3 | -6.3 | -34.1 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.48 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Hassana Amadu
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Ioanna Samanta
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Ava Hoy
|
C | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Jana Mbambo Njoya
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Charity Sawyer
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
India Webb
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2026-2027 Shot Zones
131 located field-goal attempts in 2 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Vivien NejašmićTiana ThompsonJoan QuinnAmiya MosesOlivia OstoniEmilia ColemanKiara WilliamsLauren Patnode
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 20-30 | 66.7 | 40 | Joan Quinn 30% (12 pts) | Vivien Nejašmić 20% (8 pts) | Joan Quinn 30% (3 misses) | Amiya Moses 20% (2 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 11-30 | 36.7 | 22 | Amiya Moses 27% (6 pts) | Vivien Nejašmić 27% (6 pts) | Vivien Nejašmić 26% (5 misses) | Kiara Williams 21% (4 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 1-10 | 10.0 | 2 | Tiana Thompson 100% (2 pts) | - | Joan Quinn 33% (3 misses) | Kiara Williams 22% (2 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 0-5 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Kiara Williams 60% (3 misses) | Amiya Moses 20% (1 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 1-8 | 12.5 | 2 | Amiya Moses 100% (2 pts) | - | Vivien Nejašmić 43% (3 misses) | Joan Quinn 14% (1 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 0-4 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Vivien Nejašmić 50% (2 misses) | Amiya Moses 25% (1 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 2-4 | 50.0 | 6 | Lauren Patnode 100% (6 pts) | - | Emilia Coleman 50% (1 misses) | Lauren Patnode 50% (1 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 5-16 | 31.2 | 15 | Olivia Ostoni 40% (6 pts) | Tiana Thompson 40% (6 pts) | Emilia Coleman 45% (5 misses) | Tiana Thompson 18% (2 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 0-2 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Emilia Coleman 50% (1 misses) | Tiana Thompson 50% (1 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 3-22 | 13.6 | 9 | Emilia Coleman 33% (3 pts) | Sophi Hutchison 33% (3 pts) | Emilia Coleman 37% (7 misses) | Olivia Ostoni 21% (4 misses) |