LSU
2010 Team Stats (27 games)
62.9
PPG
-
Opp
-
Margin
41.1%
FG%
30.5%
3P%
72.0%
FT%
32.9
RPG
13.4
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
69.8
Adj PPG
45.5
Adj Opp PPG
#9
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2009-2010
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1157 (#77) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1280 (#30) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1070 (#85) | HCA +89 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +25.7 (#9) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +26.3 (#8) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.960 (#7) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.994 (#6) | AdjNet +43.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.995 (#6) | AdjNet +44.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.901 (#9) | AdjO 69.8 | AdjD 45.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.835 (#11) | AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 49.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.926 (#12) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.918 (#12) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1228 (#45) | RD 116 | GP 31 |
2010 Schedule & Results
2010 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Hightower
|
G | 27 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 15.3 | 8.9 | 286 | 28 | 10.2 | 12.7 | 44.4 | 42.7 | 75.2 | 4.17 | 52.9 | 49.4 |
L. Barrett
|
NA | 23 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 7.3 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 279 | 28 | 10.0 | 14.8 | 39.2 | 30.4 | 85.4 | 4.87 | 51.3 | 40.6 |
K. Graham
|
G | 27 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 309 | 28 | 11.0 | 14.8 | 46.8 | 25.0 | 66.1 | 7.36 | 50.3 | 47.1 |
T. Turnbow
|
NA | 19 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 4.9 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 5.8 | 7.1 | 62 | 28 | 2.2 | 4.7 | 45.0 | 0 | 66.7 | -3.19 | 48.9 | 45.0 |
C. Jones
|
NA | 8 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 5.9 | 6.4 | 243 | 28 | 8.7 | 19.0 | 44.7 | 11.1 | 50.0 | 4.32 | 46.9 | 45.7 |
L. Eason
|
G | 18 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 4.1 | 6.3 | 147 | 24 | 6.1 | 11.5 | 39.7 | 33.3 | 80.0 | 0.57 | 50.1 | 45.2 |
D. Hughes
|
NA | 9 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 193 | 27 | 7.1 | 14.0 | 33.3 | 40.0 | 100.0 | 1.74 | 42.2 | 39.4 |
S. Black
|
NA | 4 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 85 | 19 | 4.5 | 18.6 | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 2.9 | 55.1 | 50.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG