🐻⬇️🏀

LSU

Season: 2027 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018
Also known as: LSU Tigers
Program History
Coach: Van Chancellor

2009 Team Stats (25 games)

59.0
PPG
54.5
Opp
+4.5
Margin
41.2%
FG%
28.2%
3P%
65.5%
FT%
32.8
RPG
12.8
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
63.2
Adj PPG
46.1
Adj Opp PPG
#32
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2008-2009
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1419 (#20) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1244 (#43) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +85 elo More → 1122 (#36) HCA +85 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More → +18.5 (#31) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → +19.6 (#22) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.782 (#56) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +31.5 More → 0.975 (#23) AdjNet +31.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +32.3 More → 0.977 (#23) AdjNet +32.3
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 63.2 | AdjD 46.1 More → 0.826 (#32) AdjO 63.2 | AdjD 46.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 50.1 More → 0.751 (#24) AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 50.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.889 (#22) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.879 (#21) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 112 | GP 30 More → 1265 (#25) RD 112 | GP 30

2009 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2008-11-16 vs Notre Dame Fighting Irish L 53 - 62
2008-11-24 vs Tulane Green Wave W 63 - 47
2008-11-26 vs Xavier Musketeers L 48 - 57
2008-11-30 vs Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders L 75 - 79
2008-12-01 vs Texas Southern Tigers W 61 - 30
2008-12-15 vs Louisiana Tech Lady Techsters W 51 - 41
2008-12-18 vs SE Louisiana Lady Lions W 65 - 40
2008-12-20 @ Centenary (LA) Gentlemen W 74 - 31
2008-12-28 vs Florida State Seminoles L 57 - 61
2009-01-01 vs Nebraska Cornhuskers W 64 - 50
2009-01-03 @ UConn Huskies L 63 - 76
2009-01-08 @ Arkansas Razorbacks W 62 - 42
2009-01-11 vs Alabama Crimson Tide W 55 - 34
2009-01-14 @ New Orleans Privateers W 67 - 48
2009-01-18 @ Vanderbilt Commodores L 67 - 75
2009-01-22 vs Mississippi State Bulldogs L 36 - 38
2009-01-25 @ Kentucky Wildcats W 59 - 56
2009-01-29 @ South Carolina Gamecocks W 63 - 56
2009-02-01 vs Auburn Tigers L 55 - 66
2009-02-05 vs Arkansas Razorbacks W 68 - 53
2009-02-08 @ Mississippi State Bulldogs L 55 - 65
2009-02-15 vs Florida Gators W 66 - 47
2009-02-19 @ Georgia Lady Bulldogs W 57 - 46
2009-02-22 vs Kentucky Wildcats W 57 - 56
2009-02-26 vs Tennessee Lady Volunteers W 63 - 61
2009-03-01 @ Ole Miss Rebels W 59 - 48
2009-03-06 vs Mississippi State Bulldogs W 63 - 58
2009-03-07 @ Vanderbilt Commodores L 47 - 61
2009-03-22 vs Green Bay Phoenix W 69 - 59
2009-03-24 @ Louisville Cardinals L 52 - 62

2009 Roster

Minutes by Position

Not enough player minute data to plot.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Hightower A. Hightower G 25 0.0 15.0 4.6 2.9 2.0 1.2 1.6 13.3 10.8 - - - - 45.5 17.6 70.1 - 50.2 46.4
L. Barrett L. Barrett NA 22 0.0 10.7 5.4 1.0 1.0 0.5 2.5 10.0 6.1 - - - - 39.3 0 71.9 - 45.7 39.3
J. Cornette J. Cornette - 11 0.0 9.2 5.5 1.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 8.2 8.4 - - - - 46.7 0 58.6 - 49.1 46.7
A. Kelly A. Kelly NA 2 0.0 9.0 3.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 8.5 5.0 - - - - 35.3 37.5 0.0 - 50.3 52.9
A. Dunning A. Dunning C 7 0.0 7.3 7.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 2.6 4.6 8.3 - - - - 56.2 0 75.0 - 62.5 56.2
K. Graham K. Graham G 21 0.0 5.7 5.4 2.6 1.7 0.3 1.9 6.0 7.9 - - - - 40.0 25.0 54.8 - 42.9 40.8
C. Jones C. Jones NA 10 0.0 5.6 3.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.2 6.4 4.2 - - - - 32.8 27.3 73.3 - 39.7 35.2
D. Hughes D. Hughes NA 9 0.0 4.2 2.3 1.4 1.2 0.6 2.4 4.9 2.4 - - - - 31.8 37.5 40.0 - 39.3 38.6
L. Eason L. Eason G 15 0.0 3.8 2.2 2.7 0.9 0.1 1.5 3.6 4.6 - - - - 37.0 18.2 88.2 - 46.4 38.9
T. Turnbow T. Turnbow NA 3 0.0 2.7 4.3 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 6.0 2.3 - - - - 22.2 0 0.0 - 20.7 22.2

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG