๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Loyola Marymount

2026-2027 Team Stats (2 games)

79.5
PPG
54.5
Opp
+25.0
Margin
48.0%
FG%
30.0%
3P%
64.3%
FT%
30.5
RPG
16.0
APG
13.5
TO
72.2
Est. poss./game
66.5
Adj PPG
59.1
Adj Opp PPG
#78
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 1157 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1084, returning +8, transfers +66, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 1170 (#88) Preseason prior 1157 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1084, returning +8, transfers +66, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +185 elo More โ†’ 1125 (#78) HCA +185 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +185 elo More โ†’ 1073 (#80) HCA +185 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More โ†’ +8.6 (#104) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.7 More โ†’ +8.3 (#104) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.895 (#63) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +12.7 More โ†’ 0.720 (#87) AdjNet +12.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +12.1 More โ†’ 0.718 (#88) AdjNet +12.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 59.1 More โ†’ 0.681 (#78) AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 59.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 59.1 More โ†’ 0.652 (#76) AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 59.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.709 (#79) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.704 (#79) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 197 | GP 2 More โ†’ 1141 (#80) RD 197 | GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.778 (#79) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 vs Nevada Wolf Pack W 89 - 64
2026-11-06 @ Utah State Aggies W 70 - 45
2026-11-10 vs Life Pacific Warriors - Incomplete score
2026-11-13 @ Alabama A&M Bulldogs - Preview
2026-11-15 @ Hawai'i Rainbow Wahine - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Shawnee Nordstrom Shawnee Nordstrom G 2 24.5 16.0 2.5 2.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 9.5 11.5 - - - - 57.9 53.8 75.0 - 77.1 76.3
Erica Finney Erica Finney G 2 14.0 14.0 3.0 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.5 8.0 10.5 - - - - 56.2 58.3 100.0 - 80.8 78.1
Danae Powell Danae Powell G 2 20.0 12.5 2.0 1.0 2.5 0.0 1.0 7.0 10.0 - - - - 64.3 44.4 100.0 - 81.6 78.6
Maya Hernandez Maya Hernandez F 2 18.0 11.5 3.0 4.0 5.0 0.5 1.5 9.5 13.0 84 3 28.0 55.3 52.6 0.0 50.0 3.07 53.1 52.6
Kayla Jones Kayla Jones F 2 19.5 11.0 9.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.5 12.0 10.5 93 3 31.0 59.1 45.8 0.0 0 3.24 45.8 45.8
Ivana Krajina Ivana Krajina G 2 14.5 7.0 1.5 2.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 5.0 6.5 62 3 20.7 45.2 70.0 0.0 0 2.06 70.0 70.0
Ana Milanovic Ana Milanovic F 2 15.5 6.5 4.5 2.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 4.5 7.5 12 3 4.0 13.2 55.6 0 50.0 -4.5 55.8 55.6
Allison Clarke Allison Clarke G 2 17.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 6.0 2.5 35 3 11.7 22.0 33.3 20.0 0 -2.83 41.7 41.7
Sarah Deng Sarah Deng G 2 21.5 4.5 7.5 3.0 2.5 0.5 2.0 5.5 10.5 - - - - 27.3 0.0 37.5 - 31.0 27.3
Ali'a Matavao Ali'a Matavao F 2 14.0 3.5 3.0 1.5 1.0 0.0 2.0 4.5 2.5 28 3 9.3 25.6 33.3 0.0 16.7 0.34 30.1 33.3
Shanayka Ismar Shanayka Ismar G 2 10.5 1.5 2.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 2.0 3.0 - - - - 25.0 0.0 50.0 - 30.7 25.0
Mari Somvichian Mari Somvichian G 2 11.0 1.0 1.5 2.5 1.0 0.0 2.5 1.5 2.0 22 3 7.3 30.3 33.3 0.0 0 -3.39 33.3 33.3
Janay Brantley Janay Brantley G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lova Lagerlid Lova Lagerlid G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

150 located field-goal attempts in 2 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Jones25% Hernandez31% Krajina100% Powell33% Finney43% Nordstrom67% Nordstrom43%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Jones53% Matavao22% Hernandez33% Hernandez100% Milanovic50% Clarke20% Clarke33% Nordstrom50% Finney60% Clarke45%
Misses: who misses most here

Shawnee NordstromErica FinneyDanae PowellKayla JonesMaya HernandezIvana KrajinaAllison ClarkeAna MilanovicAli'a Matavao

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 36-51 70.6 72 Kayla Jones 25% (18 pts) Ivana Krajina 14% (10 pts) Kayla Jones 53% (8 misses) Maya Hernandez 20% (3 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 16-34 47.1 32 Maya Hernandez 31% (10 pts) Shawnee Nordstrom 19% (6 pts) Ali'a Matavao 22% (4 misses) Ana Milanovic 17% (3 misses)
Mid-range left 2-8 25.0 4 Ivana Krajina 100% (4 pts) - Maya Hernandez 33% (2 misses) Shanayka Ismar 33% (2 misses)
Mid-range center 0-1 0.0 0 - - Maya Hernandez 100% (1 misses) -
Mid-range right 0-2 0.0 0 - - Ana Milanovic 50% (1 misses) Kayla Jones 50% (1 misses)
Left corner 3 0-5 0.0 0 - - Allison Clarke 20% (1 misses) Erica Finney 20% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 3-6 50.0 9 Danae Powell 33% (3 pts) Erica Finney 33% (3 pts) Allison Clarke 33% (1 misses) Kayla Jones 33% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 7-17 41.2 21 Erica Finney 43% (9 pts) Allison Clarke 29% (6 pts) Shawnee Nordstrom 50% (5 misses) Allison Clarke 10% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 center 3-8 37.5 9 Shawnee Nordstrom 67% (6 pts) Erica Finney 33% (3 pts) Erica Finney 60% (3 misses) Danae Powell 20% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 right 7-18 38.9 21 Shawnee Nordstrom 43% (9 pts) Danae Powell 29% (6 pts) Allison Clarke 45% (5 misses) Danae Powell 27% (3 misses)