Kenyon
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 955 (#324) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 883 (#390) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -19.9 (#355) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.017 (#702) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.004 (#426) | NetEff -38.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.026 (#636) | AdjNet -31.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.022 (#636) | AdjNet -31.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.158 (#620) | AdjO 48.7 | AdjD 67.1 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Earlham | L | 48 - 55 |
| 2024-11-12 | vs | Bluffton | L | 40 - 65 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Capital | L | 34 - 68 |
| 2024-11-19 | @ | Penn St.-Shenango | W | 55 - 52 |
| 2024-11-22 | vs | Mount Union | L | 52 - 73 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Marietta | L | 38 - 72 |
| 2024-12-05 | @ | Wittenberg | L | 43 - 82 |
| 2024-12-09 | vs | Pitt.-Greensburg | W | 69 - 60 |
| 2024-12-11 | vs | Kalamazoo | L | 51 - 64 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Olivet | L | 47 - 53 |
| 2024-12-30 | @ | Heidelberg | L | 53 - 70 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Denison | L | 28 - 79 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Hiram | L | 51 - 82 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 31 - 68 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | DePauw | L | 38 - 76 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Wooster | L | 57 - 66 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Oberlin | L | 40 - 73 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Denison | L | 44 - 70 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Wittenberg | L | 31 - 63 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Hiram | L | 49 - 70 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 47 - 89 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | DePauw | L | 29 - 86 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Wooster | L | 60 - 71 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Oberlin | L | 39 - 62 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alyssa Horsley | - | 24 | 29.7 | 11.2 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 11.8 | 5.2 | -31 | -0.9 | -1.2 | 37.8 | 18.1 | 77.4 | -0.17 | 44.1 | 40.5 |
| Kiana Mollabashy | - | 24 | 27.1 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 10.6 | 2.2 | 25 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 30.3 | 30.3 | 65.7 | 0.26 | 40.3 | 38.2 |
| Alyssa Gest | - | 9 | 13.8 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 35 | 3.9 | 6.7 | 37.0 | 32.4 | 75.0 | -0.14 | 50.3 | 48.9 |
| Susannah Zimmerman | - | 22 | 22.5 | 5.1 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 6.5 | 0.2 | -38 | -1.2 | -1.6 | 29.4 | 12.2 | 73.3 | -0.41 | 35.9 | 31.5 |
| Anissa Hardy | - | 10 | 11.9 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 5.6 | -12 | -0.9 | -1.4 | 52.9 | 0 | 73.7 | -0.63 | 59.0 | 52.9 |
| Grace Murphy | - | 23 | 23.7 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 1.4 | -23 | -0.7 | -1.0 | 30.3 | 22.6 | 88.9 | 0.01 | 38.9 | 36.4 |
| Katherine Organ | - | 23 | 15.7 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | -21 | -0.7 | -1.5 | 35.2 | 28.6 | 57.1 | -0.56 | 41.2 | 39.6 |
| Eva Winston | - | 22 | 16.1 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 1.2 | -37 | -1.3 | -2.7 | 27.4 | 7.1 | 53.6 | -0.77 | 32.2 | 28.0 |
| Melana Pomerants | - | 12 | 14.0 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 1.6 | -13 | -1.0 | -2.1 | 32.5 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.02 | 33.5 | 32.5 |
| Alexis Newman | - | 24 | 19.7 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 3.0 | -0.2 | -35 | -1.5 | -2.4 | 21.9 | 25.0 | 60.0 | -0.32 | 31.7 | 29.5 |
| Chiara Nevard | - | 23 | 7.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | -2 | -0.1 | -0.4 | 43.8 | 66.7 | 72.7 | -0.03 | 51.6 | 46.9 |
| Megan Lieb | - | 24 | 20.8 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 2.8 | -43 | -1.9 | -2.9 | 29.2 | 16.7 | 56.2 | -0.35 | 34.5 | 30.2 |
| Ruby Hutchins | - | 21 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Mikayla Rudolph | - | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Raine Hammel | - | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Paige Bing | - | 10 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG