๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Kent State

2026-2027 Team Stats (2 games)

68.0
PPG
75.0
Opp
-7.0
Margin
36.0%
FG%
22.9%
3P%
69.1%
FT%
35.5
RPG
10.5
APG
15.5
TO
79.6
Est. poss./game
62.5
Adj PPG
71.0
Adj Opp PPG
#218
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 995 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1042, returning +17, transfers -64, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 922 (#217) Preseason prior 995 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1042, returning +17, transfers -64, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 961 (#199) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 962 (#199) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ -6.1 (#219) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More โ†’ -6.2 (#219) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.378 (#178) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -11.9 More โ†’ 0.366 (#214) AdjNet -11.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -13.9 More โ†’ 0.351 (#228) AdjNet -13.9
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 62.5 | AdjD 71.0 More โ†’ 0.399 (#218) AdjO 62.5 | AdjD 71.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 62.4 | AdjD 70.9 More โ†’ 0.400 (#218) AdjO 62.4 | AdjD 70.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.371 (#221) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.371 (#221) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 197 | GP 2 More โ†’ 945 (#204) RD 197 | GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.394 (#197) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 vs Troy Trojans L 78 - 89
2026-11-07 @ Northern Kentucky Norse L 58 - 61
2026-11-14 vs Duquesne Dukes - Incomplete score
2026-11-18 @ Butler Bulldogs - Preview
2026-11-21 @ Cleveland State Vikings - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Riley Rismiller Riley Rismiller C 1 34.0 18.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 9.0 19.0 -14 1 -14.0 -16.2 66.7 100.0 71.4 -2.4 74.5 72.2
Emory Klatt Emory Klatt F 2 31.5 14.0 7.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 1.5 8.0 13.5 -1 2 -0.5 -0.6 56.2 50.0 75.0 1.65 65.8 59.4
Corynne Hauser Corynne Hauser G 2 26.5 12.5 3.5 4.0 0.5 0.0 4.0 12.5 4.0 -22 2 -11.0 -16.8 28.0 25.0 100.0 -3.45 42.5 30.0
Talia Harris Talia Harris G 2 26.0 10.0 2.5 2.5 1.5 0.0 1.5 9.0 6.0 -2 2 -1.0 -1.6 38.9 0 42.9 -1.75 41.4 38.9
Whitney Stafford Whitney Stafford G 2 26.0 8.0 2.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.5 9.5 0.5 0 2 0.0 0.0 26.3 30.8 100.0 0.16 40.2 36.8
Sini Luukkonen Sini Luukkonen G 2 35.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.5 10.0 2.0 1 2 0.5 0.6 30.0 11.1 50.0 1.82 34.5 32.5
Dania McClain Dania McClain G 2 6.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 2.5 3.5 -3 2 -1.5 -9.0 80.0 0 100.0 0.32 85.0 80.0
Maddie Kiper Maddie Kiper G 2 14.5 1.5 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.5 0.5 -12 2 -6.0 -16.8 20.0 0.0 50.0 -2.51 25.5 20.0
Anna Campanelli Anna Campanelli G 2 14.0 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 3.5 -2.5 -9 2 -4.5 -12.6 0.0 0.0 50.0 -3.87 6.3 0.0
Journey Hildebrand Journey Hildebrand G 2 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 -8 2 -4.0 -63.2 0.0 0.0 0 -2.61 0.0 0.0
Caitlyn Holmes Caitlyn Holmes G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lauren Bain Lauren Bain F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Janae Tyler Janae Tyler F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

125 located field-goal attempts in 2 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Klatt38% Rismiller36% Harris67% Hauser50% Luukkonen100% Stafford100% Hauser33% Klatt50%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Hauser27% Hauser26% Hauser40% Klatt33% Hauser43% Campanelli25% Stafford45% Stafford67% Luukkonen56%
Misses: who misses most here

Emory KlattCorynne HauserTalia HarrisWhitney StaffordRiley RismillerSini LuukkonenAnna Campanelli

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 13-28 46.4 26 Emory Klatt 38% (10 pts) Corynne Hauser 23% (6 pts) Corynne Hauser 27% (4 misses) Talia Harris 27% (4 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 14-37 37.8 28 Riley Rismiller 36% (10 pts) Sini Luukkonen 21% (6 pts) Corynne Hauser 26% (6 misses) Emory Klatt 17% (4 misses)
Mid-range left 6-11 54.5 12 Talia Harris 67% (8 pts) Dania McClain 17% (2 pts) Corynne Hauser 40% (2 misses) Anna Campanelli 20% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 4-7 57.1 8 Corynne Hauser 50% (4 pts) Emory Klatt 25% (2 pts) Emory Klatt 33% (1 misses) Talia Harris 33% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 0-7 0.0 0 - - Corynne Hauser 43% (3 misses) Emory Klatt 14% (1 misses)
Left corner 3 1-5 20.0 3 Sini Luukkonen 100% (3 pts) - Anna Campanelli 25% (1 misses) Emory Klatt 25% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 0-0 - 0 - - - -
Above-break 3 left 2-13 15.4 6 Whitney Stafford 100% (6 pts) - Whitney Stafford 45% (5 misses) Sini Luukkonen 27% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 center 3-6 50.0 9 Corynne Hauser 33% (3 pts) Riley Rismiller 33% (3 pts) Whitney Stafford 67% (2 misses) Corynne Hauser 33% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 right 2-11 18.2 6 Emory Klatt 50% (3 pts) Whitney Stafford 50% (3 pts) Sini Luukkonen 56% (5 misses) Whitney Stafford 22% (2 misses)