🐻⬇️🏀

Indiana Fever

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Indiana Fever
Program History

2026 Team Stats (3 games)

98.0
PPG
85.5
Opp
+7.1
Margin
48.8%
FG%
36.3%
3P%
77.9%
FT%
30.7
RPG
22.7
APG
15.7
TO
95.9
Pace

Model Outputs

2025 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2026 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1152 (#2) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1077 (#5) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +45 elo More → 1056 (#4) HCA +45 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.6 More → +9.3 (#5) HCA +2.6
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.7 More → +7.8 (#5) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.664 (#5) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +4.9 More → 0.664 (#5) NetEff +4.9
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +9.9 More → 0.801 (#4) AdjNet +9.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +10.2 More → 0.808 (#4) AdjNet +10.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 87.0 | AdjD 79.4 More → 0.667 (#4) AdjO 87.0 | AdjD 79.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 84.3 | AdjD 79.9 More → 0.598 (#4) AdjO 84.3 | AdjD 79.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.692 (#4) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.679 (#4) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 77 | GP 56 More → 1066 (#6) RD 77 | GP 56

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-04-25 @ New York Liberty W 109 - 91
2026-04-30 vs Dallas Wings L 80 - 95
2026-05-02 vs Nigeria W 105 - 57
2026-05-09 vs Dallas Wings L 104 - 107
2026-05-13 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 87 - 78
2026-05-15 vs Washington Mystics L 102 - 104
2026-05-17 vs Seattle Storm W 89 - 78
2026-05-20 vs Portland Fire W 90 - 73
2026-05-22 vs Golden State Valkyries W 90 - 82
2026-05-28 @ Golden State Valkyries L 88 - 90
2026-05-30 @ Portland Fire L 84 - 100
2026-06-04 vs Atlanta Dream W 83 - 71
2026-06-06 @ New York Liberty - Preview

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
K. Mitchell K. Mitchell G 3 16.0 15.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.0 1.0 11.0 5.3 - - - 51.5 50.0 100.0 - 63.1 59.1
C. Clark C. Clark G 3 15.3 13.3 2.3 4.0 0.7 0.3 1.3 6.7 12.7 - - - 45.0 45.5 89.5 - 70.5 57.5
Damiris Dantas Damiris Dantas F 2 20.5 11.5 5.0 2.0 0.5 0.0 2.5 10.0 6.5 - - - 35.0 28.6 83.3 - 50.8 45.0
M. Timpson M. Timpson F 3 24.0 11.3 3.0 0.3 2.0 1.3 1.0 4.0 13.0 - - - 91.7 0 75.0 - 89.3 91.7
Shatori Walker-Kimbrough Shatori Walker-Kimbrough G 3 20.3 10.0 3.3 2.0 1.3 1.3 1.0 7.0 10.0 - - - 57.1 50.0 50.0 - 61.2 61.9
J. Pissott J. Pissott - 1 10.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 6.0 - - - 50.0 66.7 100.0 - 82.0 75.0
Sophie Cunningham Sophie Cunningham G 3 13.3 7.3 1.3 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 7.0 - - - 66.7 50.0 40.0 - 77.5 83.3
K. Traylor K. Traylor G 3 11.7 7.3 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.3 5.0 1.0 - - - 46.7 40.0 100.0 - 65.6 60.0
Monique Billings Monique Billings F 3 16.3 6.0 4.0 0.3 0.7 0.7 1.7 6.0 4.0 - - - 44.4 33.3 100.0 - 48.8 47.2
R. Johnson R. Johnson - 3 18.3 6.0 3.7 4.7 2.3 1.0 1.3 4.0 12.3 - - - 58.3 20.0 60.0 - 63.4 62.5
J. Timmons J. Timmons - 3 12.7 5.3 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.3 4.7 1.0 - - - 35.7 14.3 71.4 - 46.8 39.3
Myisha Hines-Allen Myisha Hines-Allen F 3 16.3 4.0 5.3 1.3 0.3 0.0 1.0 3.7 6.3 - - - 36.4 0.0 80.0 - 45.5 36.4
A. Boston A. Boston F 1 10.0 4.0 1.0 6.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 8.0 - - - 66.7 0 0 - 66.7 66.7
T. Harris T. Harris G 1 12.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 25.8 0.0
M. McConnell M. McConnell - 3 10.7 0.0 2.0 2.3 1.3 0.3 1.7 1.7 2.7 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG