Indiana (PA)
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1141 (#25) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1193 (#42) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1160 (#30) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +15.6 (#41) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +15.2 (#100) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.672 (#239) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 1.000 (#21) | NetEff +73.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.760 (#261) | AdjNet +10.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.760 (#264) | AdjNet +9.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.660 (#267) | AdjO 76.9 | AdjD 69.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.777 (#29) | AdjO 81.8 | AdjD 68.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.839 (#39) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.835 (#33) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1284 (#16) | RD 100 | GP 20 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Concord | W | 93 - 74 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Lincoln (PA) | W | 82 - 57 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | Ashland | L | 80 - 82 |
| 2025-11-23 | vs | D'Youville | W | 94 - 66 |
| 2025-11-30 | vs | St. Thomas Aquinas | W | 78 - 64 |
| 2025-12-05 | @ | Kutztown | W | 78 - 71 |
| 2025-12-16 | vs | Mansfield | W | 111 - 71 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Bloomsburg | W | 87 - 55 |
| 2025-12-21 | @ | East Stroudsburg | W | 96 - 82 |
| 2026-01-02 | vs | West Chester | L | 83 - 88 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Millersville | W | 80 - 77 |
| 2026-01-07 | vs | Pitt.-Johnstown | W | 80 - 70 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Slippery Rock | W | 89 - 73 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Gannon | L | 65 - 92 |
| 2026-01-21 | vs | Edinboro | W | 93 - 73 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Clarion | W | 73 - 68 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | California (PA) | L | 77 - 84 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Seton Hill | W | 95 - 84 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Penn St.-Du Bois | W | 100 - 47 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Edinboro | W | 73 - 63 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallis Dillard | - | 20 | 33.0 | 20.6 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 15.6 | 16.4 | 13 | 0.7 | 4.6 | 47.3 | 39.0 | 76.2 | 0.59 | 58.0 | 53.9 |
| Christian Moore | - | 19 | 30.5 | 17.5 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 12.3 | 11.5 | -113 | -5.4 | -23.4 | 49.1 | 41.4 | 87.0 | 0.51 | 65.5 | 62.6 |
| Kymani Merraro | - | 20 | 29.4 | 13.3 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 10.1 | 7.9 | 12 | 0.6 | 4.5 | 45.3 | 38.2 | 82.3 | 1.02 | 58.5 | 53.7 |
| Damir Brooks | - | 20 | 26.2 | 9.8 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 5.7 | 13.2 | 39 | 1.9 | 17.9 | 69.3 | 0 | 61.7 | -1.39 | 69.4 | 69.3 |
| Tyler Grove | - | 19 | 16.4 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 6.6 | 3.7 | -44 | -2.3 | -22.9 | 41.3 | 35.2 | 64.7 | -1.79 | 54.7 | 53.6 |
| Ralphie Blundo | - | 2 | 14.7 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 44.4 | 0 | - | 54.5 | 54.5 |
| Ian Herring | - | 19 | 18.8 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 4.5 | 6.9 | -16 | -0.9 | -9.2 | 48.8 | 36.4 | 65.0 | -1.86 | 57.5 | 55.8 |
| Bautista Rodriguez | - | 19 | 24.7 | 5.5 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 4.7 | 7.1 | 54 | 2.8 | 32.1 | 43.8 | 21.1 | 67.6 | 0.73 | 50.5 | 46.1 |
| Luke Triggs | - | 20 | 12.7 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 4 | 0.2 | 4.4 | 51.4 | 25.0 | 36.4 | 2.45 | 54.0 | 54.9 |
| Sarp Furtun | - | 16 | 12.0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 2.9 | -8 | -0.5 | -40.1 | 35.3 | 30.4 | 100.0 | 1.54 | 50.5 | 45.6 |
| Harry Keighley | - | 2 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 51.5 | 33.3 |
| Alfonso Pickens Jr. | - | 3 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 8 | 2.7 | 18.7 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.54 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Anthony Watson | - | 1 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG