Illinois Tech
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 876 (#432) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 801 (#449) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -21.4 (#363) | HCA +2.4 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | @ | Franciscan | L | 67 - 72 |
| 2023-11-11 | @ | Houghton | L | 60 - 76 |
| 2023-11-16 | @ | Mount Mary | L | 67 - 70 |
| 2023-11-20 | vs | Andrews (MI) | W | 83 - 36 |
| 2023-11-24 | @ | Colorado Col. | L | 41 - 80 |
| 2023-11-25 | vs | Willamette | L | 58 - 91 |
| 2023-12-02 | vs | Alverno | W | 84 - 52 |
| 2023-12-09 | @ | Benedictine (IL) | L | 65 - 79 |
| 2023-12-17 | vs | Illinois Col. | L | 38 - 58 |
| 2023-12-19 | vs | St. Mary's (IN) | L | 63 - 85 |
| 2024-01-03 | @ | Edgewood | L | 43 - 77 |
| 2024-01-06 | vs | Rockford | L | 49 - 53 |
| 2024-01-10 | @ | Dominican (IL) | W | 71 - 68 |
| 2024-01-13 | @ | Concordia Wisconsin | L | 44 - 67 |
| 2024-01-17 | vs | Concordia Chicago | W | 75 - 64 |
| 2024-01-20 | vs | St. Norbert | L | 61 - 86 |
| 2024-01-24 | vs | Aurora | L | 55 - 84 |
| 2024-01-27 | @ | MSOE | L | 47 - 74 |
| 2024-01-31 | @ | Lakeland | L | 57 - 76 |
| 2024-02-03 | vs | Benedictine (IL) | L | 52 - 81 |
| 2024-02-07 | vs | Wis. Lutheran | L | 36 - 81 |
| 2024-02-10 | @ | Marian (WI) | L | 60 - 73 |
| 2024-02-14 | @ | Alverno | W | 59 - 57 |
| 2024-02-17 | vs | MSOE | L | 52 - 58 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHLOE CHURILLA | - | 1 | 29.0 | 15.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 14.0 | 10.0 | -40 | -6.7 | -7.0 | 35.7 | 0 | 62.5 | -0.08 | 42.8 | 35.7 |
| JULIA BUCCI | - | 2 | 35.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 13.5 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 36.8 | 71.4 | -0.09 | 49.9 | 46.3 |
| GRACE GOODNOUGH | - | 1 | 30.0 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 13.0 | 11.0 | -13 | -1.4 | -1.3 | 46.2 | 0 | 75.0 | 0.14 | 50.8 | 46.2 |
| KAYA JONES | - | 2 | 27.5 | 12.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 9.0 | 6.0 | -18 | -2.6 | -7.9 | 55.6 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 0.29 | 63.3 | 61.1 |
| ALLIE SILLO | - | 2 | 25.5 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 30.8 | 50.0 | 0.05 | 45.5 | 44.4 |
| CAMDEN JOKO | - | 2 | 35.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 0.5 | -88 | -9.8 | -11.1 | 35.7 | 30.8 | 0 | -0.62 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| BERIT RUSING | - | 2 | 14.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | -71 | -7.9 | -9.9 | 50.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.43 | 50.9 | 50.0 |
| ABIGAIL MARINO | - | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | -102 | -11.3 | -13.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| ANA JONES | - | 2 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 41 | 4.6 | 14.4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.54 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| RYELL SANDIFER | - | 2 | 16.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Laura Castaneda | - | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG