IU Indianapolis Jaguars
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1003 (#200) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 976 (#266) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +16.2 (#212) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.743 (#75) | - |
2006 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-11-18 | @ | Kentucky Wildcats | L | 52 - 81 |
| 2005-11-20 | @ | Iowa State Cyclones | L | 55 - 70 |
| 2005-11-25 | @ | Bowling Green Falcons | L | 55 - 66 |
| 2005-11-26 | vs | Youngstown State Penguins | W | 53 - 50 |
| 2005-11-29 | @ | Charleston Southern Buccaneers | W | 60 - 48 |
| 2005-12-04 | @ | Evansville Purple Aces | L | 64 - 67 |
| 2005-12-08 | @ | Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons | W | 59 - 50 |
| 2005-12-17 | vs | Eastern Illinois Panthers | L | 63 - 70 |
| 2005-12-28 | @ | Oakland Golden Grizzlies | W | 78 - 74 |
| 2005-12-31 | vs | Western Michigan Broncos | W | 70 - 51 |
| 2006-01-02 | vs | Western Illinois Leathernecks | L | 44 - 53 |
| 2006-01-04 | vs | Butler Bulldogs | W | 62 - 54 |
| 2006-01-07 | vs | Southern Utah Thunderbirds | W | 74 - 65 |
| 2006-01-09 | @ | Centenary (LA) Gentlemen | W | 70 - 62 |
| 2006-01-14 | @ | Kansas City Roos | W | 63 - 46 |
| 2006-01-16 | @ | Oral Roberts Golden Eagles | W | 61 - 58 |
| 2006-01-21 | vs | Kansas City Roos | W | 57 - 46 |
| 2006-01-23 | vs | Centenary (LA) Gentlemen | W | 68 - 41 |
| 2006-01-30 | @ | Valparaiso Beacons | L | 48 - 55 |
| 2006-02-04 | vs | Oakland Golden Grizzlies | W | 70 - 64 |
| 2006-02-06 | @ | Western Illinois Leathernecks | L | 57 - 60 |
| 2006-02-11 | vs | Oral Roberts Golden Eagles | W | 50 - 46 |
| 2006-02-13 | @ | Chicago State Cougars | L | 63 - 66 |
| 2006-02-20 | vs | Valparaiso Beacons | W | 63 - 55 |
| 2006-02-25 | @ | Southern Utah Thunderbirds | L | 55 - 58 |
| 2006-02-27 | vs | Chicago State Cougars | W | 55 - 46 |
| 2006-03-04 | vs | Chicago State Cougars | W | 51 - 40 |
| 2006-03-06 | vs | Oakland Golden Grizzlies | L | 54 - 66 |
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G. Hill
|
- | 9 | 33.2 | 16.7 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 10.3 | 15.1 | - | - | - | 52.7 | 23.1 | 76.6 | - | 61.9 | 54.3 |
B. Cole
|
- | 9 | 36.9 | 13.4 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 11.2 | 9.7 | - | - | - | 41.6 | 31.8 | 80.0 | - | 55.1 | 52.0 |
K. King
|
- | 9 | 34.4 | 10.7 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 8.8 | 8.3 | - | - | - | 41.8 | 27.3 | 80.8 | - | 53.1 | 47.5 |
M. Burks
|
- | 9 | 24.0 | 9.9 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 8.7 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 39.7 | 33.3 | 66.7 | - | 53.4 | 51.9 |
M. Byles
|
- | 8 | 15.6 | 7.4 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 5.8 | 6.1 | - | - | - | 47.8 | 33.3 | 60.0 | - | 56.1 | 54.3 |
C. Collishaw
|
NA | 8 | 15.0 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 5.1 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 50.0 | 94.7 | - | 66.5 | 55.0 |
A. Smith
|
- | 9 | 24.4 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 6.7 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 47.4 | - | 50.8 | 50.0 |
D. Conner
|
- | 9 | 8.2 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 63.6 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 58.9 | 63.6 |
M. Vavrek
|
- | 5 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 73.5 | 70.0 |
B. Crawford
|
- | 3 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 34.7 | 0.0 |
C. Swoope
|
- | 2 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
M. Bell
|
F | 3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
B. Van Senus
|
- | 8 | 5.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 45.0 | 50.0 |
T. Shanks
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
D. Hadley
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG