Houston Cougars
2009 Team Stats (3 games)
64.3
PPG
62.8
Opp
+4.6
Margin
37.7%
FG%
42.1%
3P%
76.5%
FT%
32.0
RPG
10.0
APG
0.0
TO
68.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 964 (#358) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 942 (#374) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +16.0 (#215) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.299 (#293) | - |
2009 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-11-14 | vs | SE Louisiana Lady Lions | W | 73 - 58 |
| 2008-11-15 | vs | Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs | W | 79 - 58 |
| 2008-11-19 | @ | Oregon State Beavers | L | 47 - 69 |
| 2008-11-21 | vs | Miami Hurricanes | W | 70 - 64 |
| 2008-11-25 | @ | TCU Horned Frogs | L | 72 - 91 |
| 2008-12-02 | @ | North Texas Mean Green | W | 80 - 66 |
| 2008-12-05 | vs | Texas Southern Tigers | W | 64 - 44 |
| 2008-12-14 | vs | Cal Poly Mustangs | W | 68 - 57 |
| 2008-12-20 | @ | Boston College Eagles | L | 56 - 62 |
| 2008-12-21 | @ | Buffalo Bulls | W | 80 - 62 |
| 2008-12-28 | vs | Akron Zips | W | 74 - 59 |
| 2008-12-31 | @ | Kansas Jayhawks | L | 56 - 73 |
| 2009-01-09 | @ | Tulane Green Wave | W | 58 - 56 |
| 2009-01-11 | @ | UTEP Miners | L | 67 - 74 |
| 2009-01-16 | vs | UAB Blazers | W | 61 - 50 |
| 2009-01-18 | vs | Memphis Tigers | W | 83 - 65 |
| 2009-01-22 | @ | Southern Miss Lady Eagles | L | 65 - 74 |
| 2009-01-25 | vs | UCF Knights | W | 80 - 65 |
| 2009-01-29 | @ | SMU Mustangs | L | 56 - 59 |
| 2009-01-31 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 68 - 46 |
| 2009-02-04 | @ | Rice Owls | W | 66 - 56 |
| 2009-02-07 | vs | Rice Owls | W | 70 - 50 |
| 2009-02-12 | vs | Tulane Green Wave | W | 60 - 53 |
| 2009-02-14 | vs | UTEP Miners | L | 72 - 75 |
| 2009-02-20 | vs | SMU Mustangs | W | 75 - 73 |
| 2009-02-22 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | L | 55 - 59 |
| 2009-02-26 | @ | Marshall Thundering Herd | W | 67 - 58 |
| 2009-02-28 | @ | East Carolina Pirates | W | 66 - 65 |
| 2009-03-06 | vs | UCF Knights | L | 66 - 79 |
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Coleman
|
- | 4 | 27.8 | 19.0 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 14.2 | 12.8 | - | - | - | 38.6 | 0.0 | 84.2 | - | 51.5 | 38.6 |
C. Taylor
|
G | 3 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 15.0 | 16.3 | - | - | - | 42.2 | 0 | 80.0 | - | 50.2 | 42.2 |
K. Lewis
|
- | 4 | 38.0 | 14.0 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 12.5 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 38.0 | 41.7 | 100.0 | - | 52.3 | 48.0 |
Z. Nixon
|
- | 2 | 21.0 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 68.9 | 66.7 |
B. Scott
|
G | 3 | 0.0 | 12.7 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 35.9 | 42.1 | 100.0 | - | 47.6 | 46.2 |
Q. Calhoun
|
- | 4 | 32.5 | 11.8 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 7.2 | 14.5 | - | - | - | 58.6 | 52.9 | 44.4 | - | 71.3 | 74.1 |
M. Cousin
|
- | 4 | 32.0 | 9.8 | 9.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 8.2 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 42.4 | 0.0 | 78.6 | - | 49.8 | 42.4 |
P. Landry
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 7.3 | 2.7 | - | - | - | 31.8 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 42.2 | 31.8 |
B. Mason
|
F | 2 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 11.5 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0 | 83.3 | - | 55.8 | 44.4 |
D. Wade
|
- | 4 | 30.5 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 4.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 30.4 | 12.5 | 88.9 | - | 42.7 | 32.6 |
R. Button
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 29.6 | 20.0 |
H. McGloster
|
- | 2 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
C. Hill
|
C | 3 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 50.6 | 50.0 |
N. Mosley
|
- | 4 | 7.8 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 69.4 | 50.0 |
D. Williams
|
- | 4 | 11.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 43.6 | 33.3 |
S. Coleman
|
- | 3 | 5.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
B. Pane
|
- | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG