Houston Cougars
2006 Team Stats (4 games)
61.8
PPG
65.9
Opp
-4.2
Margin
34.7%
FG%
29.6%
3P%
63.4%
FT%
33.3
RPG
9.8
APG
13.3
TO
82.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo | 965 (#351) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 953 (#327) | - |
| Margin | +16.0 (#216) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean | 0.299 (#293) | - |
2006 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-11-18 | @ | Wisconsin Badgers | L | 54 - 77 |
| 2005-11-20 | vs | Long Beach State Beach | W | 66 - 57 |
| 2005-11-22 | @ | Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders | L | 35 - 62 |
| 2005-11-30 | @ | Creighton Bluejays | L | 59 - 76 |
| 2005-12-02 | @ | Saint Joseph's Hawks | L | 45 - 69 |
| 2005-12-03 | vs | UT Rio Grande Valley Vaqueros | W | 63 - 55 |
| 2005-12-10 | vs | West Virginia Mountaineers | L | 54 - 79 |
| 2005-12-17 | @ | Michigan State Spartans | L | 53 - 76 |
| 2005-12-19 | vs | Dartmouth Big Green | L | 69 - 76 |
| 2005-12-20 | vs | Prairie View A&M Lady Panthers | W | 78 - 67 |
| 2005-12-30 | vs | Charlotte 49ers | L | 71 - 80 |
| 2006-01-06 | vs | UCF Knights | W | 64 - 50 |
| 2006-01-08 | vs | Southern Miss Lady Eagles | W | 92 - 58 |
| 2006-01-13 | @ | East Carolina Pirates | W | 54 - 45 |
| 2006-01-15 | vs | Rice Owls | W | 79 - 72 |
| 2006-01-20 | @ | SMU Mustangs | L | 53 - 66 |
| 2006-01-22 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | L | 55 - 83 |
| 2006-01-27 | vs | Tulane Green Wave | L | 54 - 61 |
| 2006-01-29 | vs | UTEP Miners | W | 64 - 50 |
| 2006-02-03 | @ | Rice Owls | W | 75 - 62 |
| 2006-02-06 | vs | Marshall Thundering Herd | L | 50 - 57 |
| 2006-02-10 | @ | Tulane Green Wave | L | 54 - 65 |
| 2006-02-12 | @ | UTEP Miners | L | 67 - 77 |
| 2006-02-17 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | L | 54 - 75 |
| 2006-02-19 | vs | SMU Mustangs | L | 61 - 63 |
| 2006-02-24 | @ | Memphis Tigers | W | 70 - 62 |
| 2006-02-26 | @ | UAB Blazers | W | 74 - 71 |
| 2006-03-02 | vs | UTEP Miners | W | 57 - 40 |
| 2006-03-03 | @ | Rice Owls | L | 64 - 79 |
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles, with four dividers separating the position buckets.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O. Lafayette | - | 2 | 34.5 | 19.0 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 15.0 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 43.3 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 56.7 | 56.7 |
| J. Thorpe | - | 2 | 33.5 | 16.0 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 16.5 | - | - | - | 70.0 | 100.0 | 75.0 | - | 73.5 | 72.5 |
| B. Latham | - | 2 | 28.0 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 9.5 | - | - | - | 46.2 | 20.0 | 60.0 | - | 54.6 | 50.0 |
| L. Smith | - | 1 | 31.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | 31.6 | 25.0 |
| C. Lawson | - | 2 | 12.0 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 85.7 | - | 71.6 | 58.3 |
| S. de Randamie | - | 2 | 24.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 46.3 | 45.5 |
| C. Clements | NA | 2 | 26.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | - | 38.3 | 40.0 |
| L. Roberson | - | 2 | 13.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| R. Young | - | 1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| T. Martin | - | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| C. Bloom | - | 2 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| E. Adeife | - | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG