🐻⬇️🏀

Houston Christian

Season: 2026-2027 2025-2026 2024-2025 2023-2024 2022-2023 2021-2022 2020-2021 2019-2020 2018-2019 2017-2018
Also known as: Houston Christian Huskies
Program History
Coach: Drew Long

2026-2027 Team Stats (4 games)

53.5
PPG
66.8
Opp
-13.2
Margin
36.5%
FG%
28.4%
3P%
78.8%
FT%
34.0
RPG
13.3
APG
21.3
TO
69.0
Est. poss./game
50.4
Adj PPG
65.7
Adj Opp PPG
#341
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 706 (returning production + recruiting): last season 833, returning -57, transfers -70, freshmen +0 More → 697 (#338) Preseason prior 706 (returning production + recruiting): last season 833, returning -57, transfers -70, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +179 elo More → 788 (#341) HCA +179 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +178 elo More → 877 (#343) HCA +178 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.1 More → -23.9 (#350) HCA +3.1
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.1 More → -23.5 (#350) HCA +3.1
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.021 (#343) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -27.0 More → 0.093 (#352) AdjNet -27.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -29.2 More → 0.076 (#354) AdjNet -29.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 50.4 | AdjD 65.7 More → 0.184 (#341) AdjO 50.4 | AdjD 65.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 50.5 | AdjD 65.7 More → 0.217 (#344) AdjO 50.5 | AdjD 65.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.134 (#350) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.139 (#350) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 181 | GP 3 More → 749 (#345) RD 181 | GP 3
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More → 0.082 (#343) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 @ Rice Owls L 34 - 72
2026-11-04 vs LeTourneau Yellow Jackets W 80 - 45
2026-11-06 vs Abilene Christian Wildcats L 43 - 84
2026-11-11 @ North Texas Mean Green L 57 - 66
2026-11-14 @ Weber State Wildcats - Preview
2026-11-16 @ Utah Utes - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Jordan Jackson Jordan Jackson G 3 30.0 11.0 5.7 1.7 0.3 0.0 3.0 8.7 7.0 -63 3 -21.0 -27.7 34.6 33.3 83.3 -1.56 52.7 44.2
Dasia Hyams Dasia Hyams G 4 27.2 9.0 5.0 2.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 8.5 5.5 -42 4 -10.5 -15.3 41.2 16.7 77.8 -1.42 47.4 42.6
Nikki Stanic Nikki Stanic G 4 17.2 7.5 1.8 1.2 0.2 0.0 2.2 5.5 3.0 -14 4 -3.5 -8.2 45.5 46.7 50.0 0.49 60.9 61.4
Remy Hearn Remy Hearn G 4 25.0 6.5 1.8 1.2 1.0 0.0 1.5 6.2 2.8 -30 4 -7.5 -12.0 44.0 36.4 0 0.45 52.0 52.0
Hannah Fields Hannah Fields G 4 30.5 5.5 3.0 1.0 2.2 0.0 3.5 4.8 3.5 -74 4 -18.5 -24.4 26.3 8.3 91.7 -4.23 45.3 28.9
Emelie Lindqvist Emelie Lindqvist F 2 9.5 5.0 2.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 4.0 3.5 10 2 5.0 20.8 50.0 40.0 0 -0.72 62.5 62.5
J'Lee Salinas J'Lee Salinas G 2 10.0 4.5 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 4.0 3.0 13 2 6.5 26.9 37.5 42.9 0 -0.09 56.2 56.2
Tove Caesar Tove Caesar G 4 20.2 3.5 2.0 0.5 0.8 0.2 2.2 4.0 0.8 -54 4 -13.5 -26.7 18.8 37.5 83.3 -1.97 37.6 28.1
Sidney Carr Sidney Carr G 4 10.5 2.5 2.5 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.5 2.0 3.8 16 4 4.0 14.9 50.0 0.0 100.0 -0.92 56.3 50.0
Sadie Hall Sadie Hall G 3 15.0 2.3 1.3 2.0 0.7 0.0 0.7 3.7 2.0 -17 3 -5.7 -15.2 27.3 16.7 0.0 -0.68 29.5 31.8
Tessa Engelman Tessa Engelman F 2 14.5 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 -14 2 -7.0 -19.2 22.2 0.0 0 -2.6 22.2 22.2
Veronika Korchagina Veronika Korchagina F 3 8.3 2.0 2.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 2.3 1.7 1.7 6 3 2.0 9.7 40.0 0 100.0 -0.94 51.0 40.0
Basak Orhan Basak Orhan G 2 8.5 1.5 1.5 3.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 -3 2 -1.5 -6.9 25.0 0.0 100.0 -1.82 33.8 25.0
Pearson Hearne Pearson Hearne G 3 10.7 1.3 3.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 1.7 1.7 2.3 1 3 0.3 1.3 40.0 0.0 0 -1.93 40.0 40.0
Madison Hurta Madison Hurta G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

199 located field-goal attempts in 4 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Hyams33% Hearn25% Jackson100% Hyams50% Hyams25% Stanic50% Jackson29% Stanic29% Salinas29%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Hyams19% Hyams20% Hyams33% Hyams33% Hyams36% Fields45% Jackson60% Hearn29% Fields25% Jackson23%
Misses: who misses most here

Dasia HyamsNikki StanicRemy HearnJordan JacksonHannah FieldsJ'Lee Salinas

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 27-43 62.8 54 Dasia Hyams 33% (18 pts) Remy Hearn 15% (8 pts) Dasia Hyams 19% (3 misses) Remy Hearn 19% (3 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 12-32 37.5 24 Remy Hearn 25% (6 pts) Dasia Hyams 17% (4 pts) Dasia Hyams 20% (4 misses) Jordan Jackson 15% (3 misses)
Mid-range left 1-4 25.0 2 Jordan Jackson 100% (2 pts) - Dasia Hyams 33% (1 misses) Nikki Stanic 33% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 2-8 25.0 4 Dasia Hyams 50% (2 pts) Nikki Stanic 50% (2 pts) Dasia Hyams 33% (2 misses) Hannah Fields 17% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 4-18 22.2 8 Dasia Hyams 25% (2 pts) Pearson Hearne 25% (2 pts) Dasia Hyams 36% (5 misses) Tove Caesar 21% (3 misses)
Left corner 3 6-17 35.3 18 Nikki Stanic 50% (9 pts) Emelie Lindqvist 17% (3 pts) Hannah Fields 45% (5 misses) Dasia Hyams 18% (2 misses)
Right corner 3 7-12 58.3 21 Jordan Jackson 29% (6 pts) Remy Hearn 29% (6 pts) Jordan Jackson 60% (3 misses) Hannah Fields 20% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 7-28 25.0 21 Nikki Stanic 29% (6 pts) Tove Caesar 29% (6 pts) Remy Hearn 29% (6 misses) Nikki Stanic 14% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 center 0-8 0.0 0 - - Hannah Fields 25% (2 misses) J'Lee Salinas 25% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 right 7-29 24.1 21 J'Lee Salinas 29% (6 pts) Nikki Stanic 29% (6 pts) Jordan Jackson 23% (5 misses) Nikki Stanic 18% (4 misses)