Houghton
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1105 (#69) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1086 (#119) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -1.5 (#199) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.954 (#197) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.903 (#77) | NetEff +16.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.590 (#350) | AdjNet +3.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.591 (#346) | AdjNet +3.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.521 (#361) | AdjO 62.3 | AdjD 61.3 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Alfred St. | W | 77 - 45 |
| 2024-11-12 | @ | SUNY Delhi | W | 86 - 21 |
| 2024-11-15 | @ | Emerson | W | 71 - 63 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | Hilbert | W | 71 - 39 |
| 2024-11-22 | vs | Pitt.-Bradford | W | 89 - 49 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Buffalo St. | W | 76 - 35 |
| 2024-12-11 | vs | Fredonia | W | 72 - 57 |
| 2024-12-13 | @ | Medgar Evers | W | 73 - 50 |
| 2024-12-14 | @ | John Jay | W | 82 - 55 |
| 2025-01-07 | vs | Nazareth | L | 55 - 61 |
| 2025-01-10 | vs | Keuka | W | 79 - 33 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Elmira | W | 62 - 47 |
| 2025-01-14 | @ | St. John Fisher | L | 62 - 81 |
| 2025-01-17 | @ | Utica | W | 92 - 43 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | SUNY Poly | W | 59 - 36 |
| 2025-01-24 | @ | SUNY Brockport | L | 67 - 73 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | SUNY Geneseo | L | 51 - 69 |
| 2025-01-28 | @ | Alfred | L | 58 - 60 |
| 2025-01-31 | vs | Hartwick | L | 42 - 56 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Russell Sage | W | 72 - 49 |
| 2025-02-07 | @ | Elmira | W | 62 - 51 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Keuka | W | 77 - 39 |
| 2025-02-14 | vs | SUNY Geneseo | L | 50 - 58 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | SUNY Brockport | L | 72 - 75 |
| 2025-02-18 | vs | Alfred | W | 55 - 46 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | St. John Fisher | L | 55 - 72 |
| 2025-03-19 | vs | Asbury | L | 43 - 70 |
| 2025-03-20 | vs | Ohio Christian | W | 68 - 63 |
| 2025-03-21 | vs | Northwestern-St. Paul | L | 52 - 76 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kayla Camacho | - | 28 | 32.2 | 17.2 | 6.8 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 16.0 | 11.2 | 80 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 39.4 | 33.8 | 63.9 | 0.5 | 49.7 | 47.9 |
| Tabitha Devries | - | 20 | 26.9 | 13.1 | 7.2 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 10.8 | 10.0 | 163 | 5.6 | 8.4 | 54.2 | 28.6 | 69.4 | 1.19 | 56.3 | 54.6 |
| Crysta Lacrosse | - | 29 | 31.0 | 9.6 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 11.9 | 7.1 | 67 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 30.2 | 25.2 | 67.9 | -0.02 | 37.6 | 34.7 |
| Anna Dening | - | 29 | 19.2 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 57 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 34.4 | 34.0 | 50.0 | -0.08 | 48.8 | 48.6 |
| Abby Guiher | - | 29 | 21.2 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 65 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 30.2 | 28.7 | 62.1 | 0.79 | 43.9 | 42.0 |
| Hannah Farley | - | 28 | 18.7 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 6.2 | 3.5 | 119 | 4.1 | 6.7 | 36.0 | 31.7 | 70.0 | 0.56 | 44.3 | 43.4 |
| Lilly Bentley | - | 28 | 12.1 | 3.3 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 6.2 | 47 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 52.3 | 0 | 53.3 | 0.39 | 54.2 | 52.3 |
| Samantha Barrett | - | 1 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 12 | 2.0 | 7.6 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 0 | 0.1 | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Tricia Carmer | - | 28 | 15.7 | 2.6 | 5.4 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 6.9 | 118 | 4.1 | 7.0 | 41.2 | 0.0 | 59.3 | 0.72 | 45.1 | 41.2 |
| Karina Crouse | - | 29 | 14.6 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 27 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 33.8 | 28.6 | 42.9 | 0.07 | 43.9 | 43.7 |
| Natalie Rivera | - | 15 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 26 | 1.9 | 6.1 | 50.0 | 46.7 | 100.0 | 0.4 | 66.3 | 64.6 |
| Emma Cole | - | 21 | 8.3 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | -47 | -2.2 | -6.5 | 39.5 | 0 | 42.9 | -0.57 | 40.8 | 39.5 |
| Sam Barrett | - | 15 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 12 | 2.0 | 7.6 | 21.7 | 12.5 | 75.0 | 0.1 | 30.3 | 26.1 |
| Hannah Siewert | - | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Tymber Wynn | - | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG