๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Hofstra

2026-2027 Team Stats (3 games)

66.0
PPG
59.3
Opp
+6.7
Margin
39.5%
FG%
33.9%
3P%
52.2%
FT%
42.0
RPG
15.3
APG
19.0
TO
73.4
Est. poss./game
55.7
Adj PPG
60.7
Adj Opp PPG
#218
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 936 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1007, returning -72, transfers +1, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 945 (#201) Preseason prior 936 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1007, returning -72, transfers +1, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +185 elo More โ†’ 954 (#207) HCA +185 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +185 elo More โ†’ 977 (#192) HCA +185 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More โ†’ -2.6 (#181) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.7 More โ†’ -2.5 (#180) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.321 (#202) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -3.1 More โ†’ 0.423 (#193) AdjNet -3.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -3.0 More โ†’ 0.421 (#193) AdjNet -3.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 55.7 | AdjD 60.7 More โ†’ 0.399 (#218) AdjO 55.7 | AdjD 60.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 55.6 | AdjD 60.6 More โ†’ 0.413 (#218) AdjO 55.6 | AdjD 60.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.424 (#196) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.427 (#194) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 194 | GP 2 More โ†’ 955 (#196) RD 194 | GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.378 (#199) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 @ Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets L 65 - 80
2026-11-07 vs Queens (NY) Lady Knights W 75 - 44
2026-11-11 vs Coppin State Eagles W 58 - 54
2026-11-15 @ Iona Gaels - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Angel Jones Angel Jones G 3 32.7 13.7 5.7 6.3 3.0 0.0 2.0 12.3 14.3 39 3 13.0 16.0 43.2 25.0 66.7 3.09 48.5 44.6
Ema Karim Ema Karim G 3 28.7 12.0 3.3 1.7 2.0 0.0 0.7 8.3 10.0 25 3 8.3 11.7 52.0 52.9 33.3 -0.56 68.4 70.0
Kelian Cedano Kelian Cedano G 3 27.3 10.0 7.0 1.7 3.0 0.0 2.0 9.7 10.0 22 3 7.3 10.7 37.9 23.5 57.1 1.26 46.8 44.8
Comari Mitchell Comari Mitchell G 3 22.7 9.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.3 10.0 1.7 -14 3 -4.7 -8.2 36.7 50.0 50.0 -3.32 41.4 40.0
Paloma Garcia Paloma Garcia G 3 24.3 5.7 1.3 2.0 1.3 0.3 3.7 4.0 3.0 27 3 9.0 14.8 50.0 50.0 100.0 3.34 63.8 58.3
Felicia Jacobs Felicia Jacobs F 3 20.7 5.0 8.3 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.3 4.3 8.7 -21 3 -7.0 -13.8 53.8 0 12.5 -4.99 45.4 53.8
Allie Broadus Allie Broadus F 3 17.0 3.7 5.0 0.3 0.7 0.3 2.7 6.7 0.7 -5 3 -1.7 -3.9 15.0 25.0 50.0 -2.02 24.3 20.0
Michaela Hodge Michaela Hodge C 3 13.0 3.3 2.3 1.3 0.7 1.0 1.0 5.3 2.3 38 3 12.7 38.5 31.2 0 0 1.23 31.2 31.2
Kiyanna Blacks-Stewart Kiyanna Blacks-Stewart F 3 5.7 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.7 1.7 -2 3 -0.7 -4.9 80.0 0 100.0 -2.84 82.7 80.0
Ceylone Brooks Ceylone Brooks G 1 9.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 -1.0 -8 1 -8.0 -34.2 25.0 0.0 0 -2.07 25.0 25.0
Mone't Edwards Mone't Edwards PG 1 4.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -1.0 -2 1 -2.0 -20.1 0.0 0.0 0 -1.06 0.0 0.0
Audriana Williams Audriana Williams F 1 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 6 1 6.0 59.8 0.0 0 0 -0.14 0.0 0.0
Olivia VanPatten Olivia VanPatten F 1 7.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 -1.0 -5 1 -5.0 -27.5 0.0 0.0 0 -3.91 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

195 located field-goal attempts in 3 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Mitchell31% Jones23% Jones50% Jones67% Jones60% Cedano67% Broadus29% Karim67% Karim100% Karim67%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Karim38% Hodge21% Jones55% Jones30% Mitchell50% Brooks33% Cedano60% Cedano33% Broadus50% Cedano44%
Misses: who misses most here

Ema KarimAngel JonesKelian CedanoComari MitchellMichaela HodgeAllie BroadusCeylone Brooks

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 13-21 61.9 26 Comari Mitchell 31% (8 pts) Kelian Cedano 15% (4 pts) Ema Karim 38% (3 misses) Allie Broadus 12% (1 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 30-68 44.1 60 Angel Jones 23% (14 pts) Felicia Jacobs 20% (12 pts) Michaela Hodge 21% (8 misses) Allie Broadus 16% (6 misses)
Mid-range left 6-17 35.3 12 Angel Jones 50% (6 pts) Ema Karim 33% (4 pts) Angel Jones 55% (6 misses) Comari Mitchell 18% (2 misses)
Mid-range center 3-13 23.1 6 Angel Jones 67% (4 pts) Comari Mitchell 33% (2 pts) Angel Jones 30% (3 misses) Comari Mitchell 30% (3 misses)
Mid-range right 5-17 29.4 10 Angel Jones 60% (6 pts) Comari Mitchell 40% (4 pts) Comari Mitchell 50% (6 misses) Allie Broadus 17% (2 misses)
Left corner 3 3-9 33.3 9 Kelian Cedano 67% (6 pts) Angel Jones 33% (3 pts) Ceylone Brooks 33% (2 misses) Comari Mitchell 33% (2 misses)
Right corner 3 7-12 58.3 21 Allie Broadus 29% (6 pts) Ema Karim 29% (6 pts) Kelian Cedano 60% (3 misses) Allie Broadus 20% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 6-21 28.6 18 Ema Karim 67% (12 pts) Comari Mitchell 17% (3 pts) Kelian Cedano 33% (5 misses) Allie Broadus 20% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 center 1-5 20.0 3 Ema Karim 100% (3 pts) - Allie Broadus 50% (2 misses) Ema Karim 50% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 right 3-12 25.0 9 Ema Karim 67% (6 pts) Paloma Garcia 33% (3 pts) Kelian Cedano 44% (4 misses) Ema Karim 22% (2 misses)