Hofstra Pride
Model Outputs
2004-2005
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 837 (#605) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 975 (#267) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +13.1 (#263) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.407 (#235) | - |
2005 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-11-19 | @ | Quinnipiac Bobcats | W | 77 - 61 |
| 2004-11-24 | vs | Colgate Raiders | W | 71 - 70 |
| 2004-11-27 | @ | Fordham Rams | L | 49 - 62 |
| 2004-12-01 | @ | St. John's Red Storm | L | 70 - 83 |
| 2004-12-09 | vs | Massachusetts Minutewomen | L | 57 - 64 |
| 2004-12-11 | @ | Sacred Heart Pioneers | W | 67 - 66 |
| 2004-12-17 | vs | Harvard Crimson | W | 68 - 57 |
| 2004-12-28 | vs | Loyola Marymount Lions | L | 72 - 76 |
| 2004-12-29 | vs | Fairfield Stags | W | 71 - 60 |
| 2005-01-02 | @ | UNC Wilmington Seahawks | L | 57 - 67 |
| 2005-01-06 | @ | George Mason Patriots | W | 77 - 64 |
| 2005-01-09 | vs | Towson Tigers | L | 67 - 72 |
| 2005-01-14 | @ | William & Mary Tribe | W | 78 - 70 |
| 2005-01-16 | @ | Old Dominion Monarchs | L | 54 - 79 |
| 2005-01-20 | vs | James Madison Dukes | W | 55 - 54 |
| 2005-01-23 | vs | Delaware Blue Hens | L | 54 - 70 |
| 2005-01-27 | vs | Drexel Dragons | W | 59 - 56 |
| 2005-01-30 | vs | VCU Rams | L | 69 - 75 |
| 2005-02-03 | @ | Towson Tigers | W | 72 - 69 |
| 2005-02-06 | vs | William & Mary Tribe | W | 79 - 63 |
| 2005-02-11 | @ | James Madison Dukes | L | 71 - 73 |
| 2005-02-13 | vs | UNC Wilmington Seahawks | L | 76 - 78 |
| 2005-02-17 | @ | VCU Rams | W | 60 - 54 |
| 2005-02-20 | @ | Drexel Dragons | L | 54 - 63 |
| 2005-02-24 | vs | George Mason Patriots | L | 59 - 71 |
| 2005-02-27 | @ | Delaware Blue Hens | L | 56 - 62 |
| 2005-03-03 | vs | Old Dominion Monarchs | L | 65 - 78 |
| 2005-03-09 | vs | William & Mary Tribe | W | 68 - 52 |
| 2005-03-10 | @ | Old Dominion Monarchs | L | 68 - 87 |
2005 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Stokes
|
G | 1 | 37.0 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 71.4 | - | 69.6 | 66.7 |
C. Newton
|
NA | 1 | 37.0 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 17.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 41.2 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
C. Rivera
|
- | 1 | 30.0 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 76.6 | 75.0 |
A. Agudio
|
- | 1 | 35.0 | 13.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 42.9 | 0 | - | 59.1 | 59.1 |
A. Uter
|
- | 1 | 27.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 72.5 | 100.0 |
M. Radziejewski
|
- | 1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
W. Souffrant
|
- | 1 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
K. Harris
|
- | 1 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
G. Washington
|
- | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG