Hiram
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1019 (#199) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 997 (#242) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -4.1 (#224) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.339 (#524) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.518 (#227) | NetEff +0.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.215 (#484) | AdjNet -11.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.204 (#485) | AdjNet -11.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.333 (#481) | AdjO 61.0 | AdjD 68.6 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Adrian | W | 58 - 44 |
| 2024-11-12 | vs | Geneva | L | 79 - 84 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Alfred | L | 64 - 73 |
| 2024-11-17 | vs | SUNY Delhi | W | 104 - 28 |
| 2024-11-22 | @ | Miami (OH) | L | 41 - 97 |
| 2024-11-26 | @ | Hilbert | W | 80 - 38 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 40 - 77 |
| 2024-12-09 | vs | Thiel | W | 88 - 55 |
| 2024-12-11 | @ | Penn St.-Shenango | W | 83 - 63 |
| 2024-12-16 | @ | Franciscan | W | 69 - 57 |
| 2024-12-18 | @ | Heidelberg | W | 77 - 58 |
| 2024-12-20 | vs | La Roche | L | 54 - 60 |
| 2024-12-30 | @ | Waynesburg | L | 60 - 75 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | DePauw | L | 42 - 81 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Kenyon | W | 82 - 51 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Wooster | W | 96 - 68 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Denison | L | 77 - 86 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Oberlin | L | 67 - 69 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Wittenberg | L | 53 - 73 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | DePauw | L | 52 - 72 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 55 - 91 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Kenyon | W | 70 - 49 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Wooster | W | 79 - 46 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Denison | L | 50 - 57 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Oberlin | L | 65 - 76 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Wittenberg | L | 56 - 74 |
| 2025-02-25 | @ | Denison | W | 61 - 56 |
| 2025-02-28 | @ | DePauw | L | 53 - 69 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brooke Hickman | - | 28 | 31.8 | 16.8 | 8.7 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 12.8 | 14.1 | -59 | -2.2 | -2.2 | 53.6 | 0 | 55.1 | -0.57 | 55.1 | 53.6 |
| Anastasia Lawler | - | 27 | 28.9 | 9.1 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 8.0 | 6.2 | -19 | -0.8 | -0.8 | 37.5 | 37.8 | 84.0 | -0.15 | 54.0 | 51.9 |
| Isabella Caceres | - | 27 | 31.1 | 8.3 | 3.1 | 5.1 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 3.9 | 8.4 | 6.0 | 15 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 34.8 | 28.6 | 62.0 | 0.18 | 44.8 | 42.3 |
| Ava Mory | - | 24 | 23.4 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 7.5 | 4.4 | -42 | -1.8 | -2.3 | 42.5 | 0.0 | 65.0 | -0.17 | 43.9 | 42.5 |
| Jo Janda | - | 28 | 13.3 | 5.9 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 36.8 | 33.3 | 77.3 | 0.29 | 48.1 | 45.7 |
| Avril Drew | - | 25 | 18.8 | 5.7 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 5.4 | 3.3 | -42 | -1.8 | -2.7 | 36.6 | 25.7 | 80.0 | -0.8 | 46.5 | 39.9 |
| Sarah Seaman | - | 27 | 10.6 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 15 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 37.0 | 31.4 | 60.0 | -0.23 | 48.3 | 47.0 |
| Maya Joiner | - | 28 | 11.8 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 20 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 47.1 | 0.0 | 53.1 | 0.16 | 49.3 | 47.1 |
| Juliana Gunn | - | 26 | 8.9 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 40.3 | 34.6 | 50.0 | -0.24 | 47.5 | 47.0 |
| Diara Parsons | - | 28 | 14.4 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.0 | 2.2 | -63 | -2.6 | -4.6 | 34.1 | 8.3 | 40.0 | -0.61 | 35.8 | 35.3 |
| Payton Black | - | 18 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 70.0 | 70.0 |
| Mckinzie Wilhoite | - | 2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 31 | 1.6 | 5.7 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.16 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Breyana Buxton | - | 24 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 24 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 71.4 | 0.39 | 54.6 | 50.0 |
| Advika Srinivasan | - | 7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 9 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.01 | 75.0 | 75.0 |
| Shameel Clervrain | - | 26 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 52.9 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 0.14 | 53.3 | 55.9 |
| Star Owens | - | 20 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 38.5 | 0.0 | 55.6 | 0.17 | 44.2 | 38.5 |
| Dariah Kirksey | - | 19 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 53.2 | 0.0 |
| Rylie Petroff | - | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Megan Majeres | - | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Janya Banks | - | 20 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | -0.1 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Kaelyn Hart | - | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.27 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG