Hiram
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1019 (#199) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 892 (#477) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 906 (#604) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -8.3 (#278) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -15.9 (#568) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.339 (#524) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.262 (#424) | NetEff -8.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.215 (#484) | AdjNet -11.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.204 (#485) | AdjNet -11.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.333 (#481) | AdjO 61.0 | AdjD 68.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.289 (#613) | AdjO 61.6 | AdjD 71.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.212 (#590) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.216 (#591) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 848 (#462) | RD 93 | GP 21 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | @ | Adrian | L | 53 - 84 |
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Albion | L | 63 - 69 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | St. Mary's (IN) | L | 55 - 86 |
| 2025-11-20 | @ | La Roche | W | 71 - 66 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | Thiel | W | 69 - 67 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Grove City | L | 68 - 71 |
| 2025-12-10 | vs | Alma | L | 62 - 89 |
| 2025-12-17 | vs | Wooster | L | 66 - 70 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Penn St.-Shenango | W | 98 - 70 |
| 2025-12-31 | vs | Penn St.-Behrend | L | 71 - 80 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Heidelberg | W | 79 - 73 |
| 2026-01-07 | @ | Geneva | W | 85 - 74 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Bethany (WV) | L | 57 - 75 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Westminster (PA) | L | 61 - 63 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Wash. & Jeff. | L | 62 - 79 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Allegheny | L | 66 - 76 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Chatham | L | 56 - 70 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Grove City | L | 52 - 72 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Franciscan | W | 86 - 76 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Thiel | W | 72 - 69 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Waynesburg | L | 62 - 79 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Seaman | - | 21 | 34.8 | 16.2 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 15.8 | 4.2 | -28 | -1.3 | -5.5 | 37.0 | 31.4 | 70.4 | -0.12 | 46.8 | 43.7 |
| Isabella Caceres | - | 20 | 38.4 | 14.1 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 13.4 | 8.7 | -42 | -2.0 | -7.8 | 35.4 | 32.8 | 68.1 | -1.63 | 46.9 | 43.3 |
| Maya Joiner | - | 21 | 34.6 | 10.1 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 8.2 | 17.2 | -15 | -0.7 | -3.0 | 52.3 | 0 | 58.9 | -1.03 | 54.2 | 52.3 |
| Advika Srinivasan | - | 21 | 24.5 | 8.7 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 8.0 | 1.2 | -48 | -2.3 | -13.3 | 33.9 | 34.6 | 86.2 | -1.31 | 50.6 | 47.0 |
| Star Owens | - | 17 | 21.1 | 8.2 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 6.6 | 6.9 | 6 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 48.2 | 27.3 | 78.4 | 1.37 | 54.6 | 49.6 |
| McKinzie Wilhoite | - | 16 | 19.1 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 36 | 2.2 | 74.8 | 37.7 | 0.0 | 61.8 | 0.46 | 44.1 | 37.7 |
| Emma Osborn | - | 14 | 11.5 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 3.1 | -29 | -2.1 | -15.1 | 38.8 | 0 | 60.9 | -1.77 | 44.0 | 38.8 |
| Juliana Gunn | - | 17 | 18.3 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 13 | 0.7 | 8.2 | 27.2 | 15.4 | 44.4 | -2.18 | 31.5 | 29.6 |
| Ally Lyde | - | 14 | 6.9 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 2.1 | -28 | -2.0 | -55.1 | 41.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -1.41 | 43.7 | 41.0 |
| Liz Doup | - | 16 | 12.3 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.8 | -2 | -0.1 | -0.9 | 43.3 | 0.0 | 68.8 | -2.55 | 49.9 | 43.3 |
| Rylie Petroff | - | 3 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | -7 | -2.3 | -95.5 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -1.17 | 41.0 | 50.0 |
| Riley Hunt | - | 7 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | -10 | -1.4 | -78.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.57 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rylee Gallegos | - | 2 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | -1.0 | -9 | -4.5 | -158.8 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Kaelyn Hart | - | 1 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4 | -4.0 | -188.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.61 | 0 | 0 |
| Avery Salisbury | - | 2 | 7.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG