Heidelberg
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1056 (#112) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1040 (#210) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +6.3 (#49) | HCA +2.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.622 (#385) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.650 (#206) | NetEff +5.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.625 (#305) | AdjNet +4.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.619 (#305) | AdjNet +4.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.578 (#306) | AdjO 79.8 | AdjD 76.3 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Wabash | W | 82 - 78 |
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Mary Hardin-Baylor | L | 75 - 79 |
| 2024-11-15 | vs | Manchester | L | 88 - 92 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | Calvin | W | 85 - 78 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | Kenyon | W | 80 - 59 |
| 2024-11-30 | @ | Wis.-Platteville | L | 75 - 87 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Capital | W | 100 - 75 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Muskingum | L | 77 - 78 |
| 2024-12-14 | @ | Otterbein | W | 96 - 76 |
| 2024-12-20 | @ | Wittenberg | W | 96 - 72 |
| 2024-12-29 | @ | Kent St. | L | 80 - 84 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Marietta | W | 93 - 86 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Baldwin Wallace | W | 92 - 81 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Mount Union | W | 75 - 71 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | John Carroll | L | 70 - 77 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Wilmington (OH) | W | 71 - 69 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Ohio Northern | W | 77 - 69 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Muskingum | L | 71 - 77 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | Capital | W | 107 - 59 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Otterbein | W | 73 - 67 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Baldwin Wallace | L | 85 - 91 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Marietta | W | 112 - 99 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Ohio Northern | W | 79 - 65 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Mount Union | L | 61 - 72 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | John Carroll | L | 71 - 76 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Wilmington (OH) | W | 86 - 63 |
| 2025-02-25 | vs | Ohio Northern | W | 75 - 67 |
| 2025-02-27 | @ | Mount Union | L | 66 - 77 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elijah Harden | - | 28 | 29.1 | 15.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 12.0 | 7.1 | -22 | -1.6 | -3.5 | 47.0 | 40.0 | 82.4 | 0.14 | 58.9 | 55.1 |
| Eric Panning | - | 28 | 30.4 | 14.9 | 9.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 9.8 | 16.7 | -52 | -3.5 | -5.1 | 50.7 | 0 | 75.4 | 1.2 | 58.7 | 50.7 |
| Markell Johnson-Nichols | - | 28 | 28.9 | 13.8 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 8.9 | 11.8 | -84 | -4.7 | -8.9 | 50.6 | 45.7 | 80.4 | 0.25 | 61.6 | 53.8 |
| Manny Hill | - | 27 | 25.4 | 11.1 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 9.6 | 8.1 | -1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 45.0 | 35.4 | 76.9 | 1.95 | 52.2 | 48.3 |
| Zane Leitwein | - | 28 | 30.7 | 9.4 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 7.4 | 7.1 | -45 | -3.0 | -4.5 | 41.3 | 38.5 | 90.2 | 1.23 | 58.9 | 55.1 |
| Kevin Reynald Jr. | - | 28 | 13.2 | 5.4 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 3.4 | -31 | -3.9 | -11.5 | 52.3 | 50.0 | 62.2 | 0.07 | 57.7 | 55.4 |
| Jaiden Guerra-Howard | - | 28 | 9.1 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 36.0 | 29.4 | 72.7 | 0.08 | 46.4 | 39.3 |
| Mason Wisniewski | - | 28 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 2.7 | -5 | -1.0 | -6.0 | 70.5 | 0.0 | 53.8 | -0.13 | 69.4 | 70.5 |
| Riley Gossom | - | 28 | 9.2 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 1.5 | -15 | -1.7 | -13.0 | 36.0 | 37.0 | 66.7 | -0.01 | 48.8 | 46.0 |
| Carter Pleiman | - | 23 | 7.5 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 2.1 | -38 | -4.8 | -9.9 | 53.3 | 53.8 | 50.0 | 0.54 | 64.3 | 65.0 |
| Brady Bosma | - | 24 | 6.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 5 | 0.5 | 5.8 | 40.6 | 31.8 | 88.9 | -0.03 | 57.0 | 51.6 |
| Drew Panning | - | 26 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.8 | -21 | -1.6 | -29.5 | 53.3 | 33.3 | 69.2 | -0.2 | 58.8 | 55.0 |
| Lamont Powell Jr. | - | 17 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 63 | 3.5 | 7.1 | 66.7 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.97 | 64.4 | 66.7 |
| Trent Wininger | - | 26 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 83.3 |
| Beau Bridges | - | 12 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Jackson Beasley | - | 10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Jalen Dandridge | - | 5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Darius Davis Jr. | - | 6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 24 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Dylan McGlinch | - | 5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Max Parish | - | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Demetrius Rivers | - | 22 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG