Hawaii Hilo
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1027 (#133) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 954 (#214) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +2.0 (#188) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.310 (#438) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.416 (#246) | NetEff -2.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.399 (#444) | AdjNet -3.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.406 (#444) | AdjNet -3.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.470 (#435) | AdjO 60.3 | AdjD 61.6 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | vs | Hawaii Pacific | L | 51 - 68 |
| 2024-11-28 | vs | Western Ore. | W | 56 - 49 |
| 2024-11-29 | vs | Northern St. | L | 47 - 72 |
| 2024-12-06 | @ | Hawaii Pacific | L | 50 - 59 |
| 2024-12-08 | @ | Chaminade | L | 47 - 64 |
| 2024-12-11 | vs | Eastern Ky. | L | 49 - 78 |
| 2024-12-14 | vs | Douglas (CAN) | L | 70 - 72 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Western Wash. | L | 62 - 66 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Truman St. | W | 68 - 61 |
| 2025-01-02 | vs | CUI | W | 74 - 64 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Westmont | L | 47 - 70 |
| 2025-01-09 | vs | Point Loma | L | 55 - 58 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Biola | L | 49 - 62 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Azusa Pacific | L | 47 - 66 |
| 2025-01-20 | @ | Vanguard | L | 52 - 77 |
| 2025-01-23 | @ | CUI | L | 62 - 64 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Point Loma | L | 51 - 61 |
| 2025-01-30 | vs | Academy of Art | W | 57 - 39 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Menlo | L | 53 - 56 |
| 2025-02-06 | vs | Fresno Pacific | L | 51 - 63 |
| 2025-02-10 | vs | Jessup | L | 52 - 53 |
| 2025-02-13 | vs | Chaminade | W | 59 - 42 |
| 2025-02-17 | @ | Menlo | L | 65 - 73 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Dominican (CA) | W | 67 - 59 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Jessup | L | 44 - 59 |
| 2025-02-24 | @ | Academy of Art | W | 63 - 60 |
| 2025-03-01 | vs | Hawaii Pacific | W | 62 - 57 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caiyle Kaupu | - | 24 | 25.7 | 14.6 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 12.2 | 8.1 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 44.0 | 34.1 | 70.9 | 0.28 | 51.3 | 46.4 |
| Keirstyn Agonias | - | 26 | 28.5 | 10.5 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 9.8 | 7.0 | -50 | -1.6 | -1.6 | 43.9 | 0.0 | 63.3 | 0.18 | 47.3 | 43.9 |
| Keanumarie Huihui | - | 2 | 24.0 | 9.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 12.5 | -1.5 | -69 | -2.2 | -2.2 | 28.0 | 15.4 | 33.3 | -0.3 | 32.6 | 32.0 |
| Jazmine Soto | - | 24 | 19.1 | 8.3 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 8.1 | 4.6 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 31.3 | 23.9 | 75.9 | 0.43 | 43.3 | 35.6 |
| Noelle Sua-godinet | - | 2 | 27.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 7.5 | -22 | -0.8 | -1.0 | 62.5 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.32 | 61.9 | 62.5 |
| Mindy Kawaha | - | 26 | 29.5 | 4.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 5.7 | 2.2 | -70 | -2.2 | -2.3 | 23.5 | 31.9 | 76.3 | -0.44 | 36.8 | 31.2 |
| Kendall Oda | - | 9 | 27.8 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 5.8 | 4.4 | -28 | -3.5 | -3.2 | 30.8 | 16.0 | 60.0 | -0.24 | 37.2 | 34.6 |
| Kaile Cruz | - | 11 | 14.3 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 1.2 | -69 | -4.6 | -6.0 | 24.2 | 29.0 | 64.3 | -0.45 | 35.2 | 31.5 |
| Erica Ingram | - | 14 | 11.5 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 30 | 2.7 | 6.8 | 20.0 | 24.0 | 55.0 | 0.46 | 32.5 | 26.7 |
| Melanie Hiu | - | 22 | 25.2 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 2.8 | -96 | -3.4 | -4.4 | 19.4 | 15.8 | 80.0 | -0.57 | 28.6 | 24.2 |
| Kylie Wade | - | 24 | 9.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | -16 | -1.1 | -3.1 | 15.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 | -0.32 | 20.1 | 21.1 |
| Tavina Harris | - | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -36 | -6.0 | -6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.47 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG