Haverford
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1050 (#131) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 991 (#250) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -5.6 (#244) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.383 (#504) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.426 (#262) | NetEff -2.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.317 (#440) | AdjNet -6.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.301 (#443) | AdjNet -7.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.389 (#451) | AdjO 56.4 | AdjD 61.3 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Eastern | W | 71 - 36 |
| 2024-11-13 | @ | Immaculata | L | 56 - 70 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Ramapo | W | 80 - 45 |
| 2024-11-19 | @ | Lancaster Bible | L | 50 - 60 |
| 2024-11-21 | @ | Neumann | L | 51 - 59 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Rosemont | W | 79 - 25 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Ursinus | L | 52 - 80 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Muhlenberg | L | 56 - 65 |
| 2024-12-11 | vs | Penn St. Brandywine | W | 75 - 56 |
| 2024-12-14 | vs | Gallaudet | W | 83 - 54 |
| 2024-12-30 | @ | Loyola Maryland | L | 38 - 82 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | Penn St.-Abington | W | 64 - 56 |
| 2025-01-05 | @ | Chris. Newport | L | 45 - 83 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Franklin & Marshall | W | 74 - 71 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Bryn Mawr | W | 64 - 42 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Ursinus | L | 64 - 75 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Dickinson | L | 50 - 64 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Washington Col. | L | 61 - 65 |
| 2025-01-30 | vs | Muhlenberg | L | 55 - 57 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Johns Hopkins | L | 38 - 62 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Swarthmore | W | 51 - 37 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | McDaniel | L | 49 - 70 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Bryn Mawr | W | 52 - 44 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Gettysburg | L | 33 - 71 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Washington Col. | L | 41 - 59 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Swarthmore | W | 53 - 45 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audrey Jakway | - | 26 | 28.7 | 12.5 | 7.7 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 12.3 | 7.9 | -69 | -2.2 | -2.5 | 41.9 | 28.7 | 54.7 | 0.14 | 46.8 | 45.5 |
| Caroline Orza | - | 26 | 31.0 | 12.2 | 4.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 12.4 | 5.0 | -39 | -1.1 | -1.2 | 34.4 | 27.6 | 69.7 | 0.26 | 44.9 | 41.8 |
| Brianna Feifer | - | 26 | 32.1 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 8.4 | 8.0 | -9 | -0.3 | -0.3 | 40.2 | 37.5 | 77.8 | 0.43 | 49.8 | 47.0 |
| Shae Mercer | - | 26 | 34.7 | 7.9 | 5.8 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 8.7 | 7.7 | -39 | -1.2 | -1.2 | 36.0 | 34.8 | 60.0 | 0.47 | 42.8 | 41.1 |
| Grace Leverton | - | 23 | 23.8 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 4.7 | 2.3 | -61 | -2.9 | -3.5 | 33.3 | 29.1 | 78.8 | -0.68 | 46.5 | 40.7 |
| Siena Emuobor | - | 19 | 17.5 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 5.1 | 4.6 | -56 | -3.3 | -4.4 | 40.6 | 0 | 48.4 | -0.54 | 42.4 | 40.6 |
| Abby Ryan | - | 18 | 27.2 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 5.6 | 6.5 | -20 | -1.2 | -1.5 | 36.0 | 0.0 | 60.0 | -0.1 | 38.0 | 36.0 |
| Cayla Menicola | - | 16 | 8.1 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 3.0 | -47 | -3.6 | -8.2 | 61.9 | 40.0 | 66.7 | -0.31 | 65.0 | 64.3 |
| Sophie Baker | - | 23 | 11.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 0.8 | -43 | -2.5 | -4.6 | 27.8 | 28.6 | 83.3 | -0.36 | 34.4 | 31.5 |
| Lily Zawisny | - | 10 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Ashley Peterson | - | 23 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | -0.2 | -78 | -2.4 | -2.2 | 27.3 | 28.6 | 0 | -0.28 | 36.4 | 36.4 |
| Briana Pellew | - | 24 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -13 | -0.7 | -3.7 | 75.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.24 | 67.6 | 75.0 |
| Brynn Bickel | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Allie Billups | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG