🐻⬇️🏀

Harvard Crimson

Also known as: Harvard Crimson
Program History

2018 Team Stats (4 games)

70.0
PPG
70.8
Opp
-2.4
Margin
41.8%
FG%
37.0%
3P%
84.2%
FT%
32.0
RPG
11.5
APG
9.8
TO
75.3
Pace

Model Outputs

2017-2018
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1200 (#191) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1246 (#154) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → +21.2 (#206) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.544 (#34) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -3.4 More → 0.405 (#75) AdjNet -3.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -3.2 More → 0.408 (#75) AdjNet -3.2

2018 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2017-11-23 vs Saint Mary's Gaels L 71 - 89
2017-12-02 @ Kentucky Wildcats L 70 - 79
2018-01-10 @ Wofford Terriers L 62 - 63
2018-03-10 vs Cornell Big Red W 74 - 55
2018-03-11 vs Pennsylvania Quakers L 65 - 68

2018 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Seth Towns Seth Towns - 5 28.4 19.0 6.4 2.4 0.6 0.4 1.0 15.6 12.2 - - - 42.3 41.4 85.0 0.95 54.7 50.0
B. Aiken B. Aiken G 2 28.0 15.5 2.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 12.5 4.0 - - - 36.0 21.4 83.3 - 51.2 42.0
C. Lewis C. Lewis F 5 29.6 14.6 6.0 2.4 0.4 1.0 1.4 12.2 10.8 10 0.7 1.0 52.5 0 75.0 0.94 55.1 52.5
C. Juzang C. Juzang G 4 27.5 7.2 2.0 2.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 6.5 4.5 - - - 34.6 35.3 100.0 - 51.4 46.2
J. Bassey J. Bassey G 5 30.6 6.6 4.0 1.0 1.4 0.0 1.6 4.4 7.0 - - - 45.5 33.3 75.0 - 60.5 54.5
W. Perez W. Perez F 1 8.0 6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
R. Haskett R. Haskett G 5 18.6 5.0 3.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 0.8 4.6 4.6 - - - 39.1 38.5 100.0 - 52.3 50.0
D. Djuricic D. Djuricic F 5 13.6 4.0 2.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 3.2 3.4 - - - 37.5 40.0 66.7 - 53.6 50.0
R. Farley R. Farley G 2 9.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 2.5 2.0 - - - 40.0 50.0 0 - 60.0 60.0
C. Johnson C. Johnson G 5 26.4 2.6 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.6 3.4 2.4 44 3.7 4.3 29.4 20.0 0 1.06 38.2 38.2
Baker II Baker II - 3 11.3 1.7 2.3 0.7 0.3 0.3 1.0 1.7 2.7 - - - 20.0 0.0 75.0 - 37.0 20.0
H. Welsh H. Welsh F 5 6.6 1.2 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 2.6 -0.4 - - - 23.1 0.0 0 - 23.1 23.1
A. Chatfield A. Chatfield G 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
C. Egi C. Egi F 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0
Z. Yoshor Z. Yoshor G 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG