๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Hampton

2026-2027 Team Stats (3 games)

61.0
PPG
68.7
Opp
-7.7
Margin
32.8%
FG%
27.0%
3P%
68.1%
FT%
35.0
RPG
10.3
APG
11.7
TO
69.2
Est. poss./game
66.5
Adj PPG
66.3
Adj Opp PPG
#172
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 922 (returning production + recruiting): last season 908, returning -14, transfers +58, freshmen -30 More โ†’ 884 (#205) Preseason prior 922 (returning production + recruiting): last season 908, returning -14, transfers +58, freshmen -30
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +206 elo More โ†’ 958 (#194) HCA +206 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +205 elo More โ†’ 959 (#194) HCA +205 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.2 More โ†’ +0.5 (#151) HCA +2.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.2 More โ†’ +0.5 (#150) HCA +2.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.232 (#275) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -1.2 More โ†’ 0.460 (#174) AdjNet -1.2
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -1.7 More โ†’ 0.456 (#180) AdjNet -1.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 66.3 More โ†’ 0.475 (#172) AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 66.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 66.6 | AdjD 66.3 More โ†’ 0.476 (#172) AdjO 66.6 | AdjD 66.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.454 (#177) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.454 (#177) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 201 | GP 2 More โ†’ 932 (#216) RD 201 | GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.441 (#177) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-03 @ Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets L 55 - 75
2026-11-07 @ George Washington Revolutionaries L 61 - 75
2026-11-10 vs Apprentice School Builders W 67 - 56
2026-11-14 @ Navy Midshipmen - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Seth Hubbard Seth Hubbard G 3 24.0 15.0 1.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 12.3 3.7 -37 2 -18.5 -34.0 37.8 36.8 83.3 -0.97 53.2 47.3
Aaron Davis Aaron Davis G 3 21.3 8.0 3.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 1.3 10.0 0.3 -15 2 -7.5 -14.2 30.0 25.0 33.3 -1.53 38.3 38.3
Etienne Strothers Etienne Strothers G 3 22.3 7.0 2.3 2.7 2.0 1.0 1.7 7.0 6.3 -8 2 -4.0 -7.2 23.8 11.1 76.9 0.25 39.3 26.2
Nehemiah Lawrence Nehemiah Lawrence G 3 28.3 6.7 2.7 4.3 2.0 0.0 0.7 4.7 10.3 -17 2 -8.5 -12.5 28.6 42.9 75.0 -0.01 51.9 39.3
Cornelius Robinson Jr. Cornelius Robinson Jr. F 3 22.3 6.3 7.7 1.0 0.3 0.7 0.7 4.0 11.3 -21 2 -10.5 -21.6 58.3 0.0 62.5 -1.0 61.2 58.3
Jayme Mitchell Jr. Jayme Mitchell Jr. G 3 21.7 6.0 4.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.3 5.7 4.3 -22 2 -11.0 -20.4 29.4 25.0 60.0 -1.14 42.1 35.3
Max Frazier Max Frazier F 3 25.0 6.0 4.0 1.7 1.0 1.0 2.0 6.0 5.7 -30 2 -15.0 -17.6 38.9 0 50.0 -0.85 41.8 38.9
Tyler Jackson Tyler Jackson G 3 10.0 2.7 0.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 4.3 -0.7 -4 2 -2.0 -7.1 23.1 25.0 0 -1.14 30.8 30.8
Peter Da Cruz Peter Da Cruz F 2 9.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 3.0 3.0 -12 2 -6.0 -26.3 16.7 0.0 50.0 -0.34 21.8 16.7
Zion Ibekwe Zion Ibekwe F 3 5.7 1.3 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.7 1.0 1.7 -1 2 -0.5 -3.7 66.7 0 0 0.04 66.7 66.7
William Preston William Preston F 3 5.0 1.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.7 3.0 2 2 1.0 27.7 0.0 0 75.0 -0.08 39.9 0.0
Hamza Asadallah Hamza Asadallah G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Aidan Haskins Aidan Haskins G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kellan Lewis Kellan Lewis G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rav Randhawa Rav Randhawa G 3 8.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 -5 2 -2.5 -18.8 0.0 0.0 0 -0.15 0.0 0.0
Sylvanus Tabe Sylvanus Tabe F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Chris Eldredge Chris Eldredge G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

174 located field-goal attempts in 3 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Strothers24% Frazier27% Davis50% Hubbard100% Hubbard100% Mitchell100% Hubbard75% Davis50% Davis100% Lawrence33%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Strothers28% Frazier19% Frazier40% Davis25% Hubbard40% Davis50% Davis33% Hubbard31% Davis43% Davis27%
Misses: who misses most here

Seth HubbardAaron DavisMax FrazierJayme Mitchell Jr.Etienne StrothersNehemiah Lawrence

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 17-35 48.6 34 Etienne Strothers 24% (8 pts) Cornelius Robinson Jr. 18% (6 pts) Etienne Strothers 28% (5 misses) Aaron Davis 17% (3 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 15-41 36.6 30 Max Frazier 27% (8 pts) Cornelius Robinson Jr. 20% (6 pts) Max Frazier 19% (5 misses) Jayme Mitchell Jr. 15% (4 misses)
Mid-range left 2-7 28.6 4 Aaron Davis 50% (2 pts) Cornelius Robinson Jr. 50% (2 pts) Max Frazier 40% (2 misses) Jayme Mitchell Jr. 20% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 1-5 20.0 2 Seth Hubbard 100% (2 pts) - Aaron Davis 25% (1 misses) Cornelius Robinson Jr. 25% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 2-12 16.7 4 Seth Hubbard 100% (4 pts) - Seth Hubbard 40% (4 misses) Max Frazier 20% (2 misses)
Left corner 3 1-7 14.3 3 Jayme Mitchell Jr. 100% (3 pts) - Aaron Davis 50% (3 misses) Seth Hubbard 33% (2 misses)
Right corner 3 4-10 40.0 12 Seth Hubbard 75% (9 pts) Nehemiah Lawrence 25% (3 pts) Aaron Davis 33% (2 misses) Etienne Strothers 17% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 8-21 38.1 24 Aaron Davis 50% (12 pts) Seth Hubbard 25% (6 pts) Seth Hubbard 31% (4 misses) Jayme Mitchell Jr. 23% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 center 1-8 12.5 3 Aaron Davis 100% (3 pts) - Aaron Davis 43% (3 misses) Seth Hubbard 29% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 right 6-28 21.4 18 Nehemiah Lawrence 33% (6 pts) Seth Hubbard 33% (6 pts) Aaron Davis 27% (6 misses) Etienne Strothers 18% (4 misses)