Gordon
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 972 (#297) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 916 (#355) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -17.3 (#338) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.164 (#606) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.289 (#301) | NetEff -6.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.052 (#600) | AdjNet -25.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.047 (#598) | AdjNet -25.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.175 (#608) | AdjO 59.5 | AdjD 76.5 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Coast Guard | L | 52 - 77 |
| 2024-11-15 | vs | Dean | W | 94 - 42 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | Geneva | L | 90 - 92 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Elms | W | 69 - 39 |
| 2024-11-26 | @ | Salem St. | L | 77 - 85 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | Nichols | L | 84 - 89 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Endicott | L | 34 - 82 |
| 2024-12-10 | vs | U New England | L | 65 - 68 |
| 2024-12-31 | vs | Alfred | W | 76 - 74 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | Mount Holyoke | L | 64 - 70 |
| 2025-01-04 | @ | Hartford | L | 56 - 81 |
| 2025-01-07 | @ | Suffolk | W | 78 - 61 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Wentworth | W | 72 - 49 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Western New Eng. | L | 45 - 57 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Roger Williams | L | 54 - 86 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Curry | W | 55 - 53 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Endicott | L | 43 - 69 |
| 2025-01-28 | @ | Nichols | L | 74 - 87 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Hartford | W | 91 - 80 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Suffolk | L | 74 - 88 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | U New England | L | 60 - 87 |
| 2025-02-11 | vs | Curry | W | 70 - 57 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Roger Williams | L | 54 - 87 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Western New Eng. | L | 39 - 62 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Wentworth | W | 73 - 65 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ami Rivera | - | 25 | 27.8 | 15.4 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 12.2 | 10.8 | -9 | -0.4 | -0.5 | 43.4 | 34.7 | 81.4 | 0.19 | 55.5 | 50.3 |
| Woynitu Ciccarello | - | 24 | 26.2 | 13.1 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 13.4 | 4.7 | -27 | -1.0 | -1.3 | 35.1 | 31.7 | 69.8 | 0.15 | 46.2 | 44.3 |
| Naomi Nicholson | - | 25 | 32.9 | 9.4 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 3.8 | 9.1 | 7.3 | -33 | -1.6 | -1.5 | 33.3 | 33.8 | 62.7 | -0.1 | 46.1 | 43.2 |
| Sophie Peters | - | 23 | 23.0 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 7.0 | 8.0 | -22 | -0.8 | -1.1 | 34.0 | 24.1 | 80.6 | -0.45 | 44.1 | 36.1 |
| Leah Mcgarvey | - | 16 | 26.8 | 6.4 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 7.8 | 3.9 | -11 | -0.4 | -0.5 | 32.8 | 25.0 | 72.7 | -0.38 | 38.2 | 34.8 |
| Brynn Barnhard | - | 24 | 17.2 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 3.9 | -18 | -0.9 | -1.4 | 33.3 | 26.5 | 58.6 | 0.02 | 40.6 | 38.1 |
| Jayme Kiser | - | 25 | 14.5 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 31 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 42.3 | 32.7 | 66.7 | 0.13 | 51.9 | 51.5 |
| Sami Monighetti | - | 25 | 15.8 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.7 | 1.3 | -126 | -4.3 | -6.2 | 28.3 | 29.7 | 75.0 | -1.25 | 39.5 | 38.6 |
| Abby Chewning | - | 23 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.5 | -1.0 | -54 | -2.1 | -7.6 | 24.6 | 20.7 | 50.0 | -0.8 | 30.2 | 29.8 |
| Cassidy Dillon | - | 18 | 5.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | -32 | -1.5 | -7.4 | 33.3 | 25.0 | 22.2 | -0.64 | 34.1 | 35.7 |
| Isabelle Stogsdill | - | 20 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 12 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 15.4 | 0.0 | 40.0 | 0.25 | 23.0 | 15.4 |
| Deborah Shadare | - | 9 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 24.0 | 14.3 |
| Paige Gadarowski | - | 21 | 4.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | -36 | -1.6 | -9.0 | 5.9 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.39 | 16.4 | 5.9 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG