Gonzaga Bulldogs

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Also known as: Gonzaga Bulldogs

Program History

2026 Team Stats (34 games)

74.1

PPG

65.0

Opp

+9.1

Margin

45.2%

FG%

39.2%

3P%

76.4%

FT%

40.9

RPG

16.9

APG

17.3

71.2

Est. poss./game

73.9

Adj PPG

61.4

Adj Opp PPG

#61

Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	1274 (#54)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	1201 (#62)	-
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +106 elo More →	1101 (#63)	HCA +106 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More →	+13.4 (#60)	HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More →	+13.8 (#57)	HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.820 (#63)	-
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +12.5 More →	0.820 (#63)	NetEff +12.5
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +19.9 More →	0.909 (#61)	AdjNet +19.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +20.2 More →	0.912 (#61)	AdjNet +20.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 73.9 \| AdjD 61.4 More →	0.757 (#61)	AdjO 73.9 \| AdjD 61.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 73.0 \| AdjD 62.7 More →	0.718 (#45)	AdjO 73.0 \| AdjD 62.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.808 (#58)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.802 (#54)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 116 \| GP 34 More →	1204 (#57)	RD 116 \| GP 34

2026 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2025-11-07	@	North Dakota State Bison	W	81 - 66
2025-11-09	@	Toledo Rockets	W	72 - 69
2025-11-13	vs	Colorado State Rams	L	66 - 70
2025-11-16	vs	Stanford Cardinal	L	52 - 65
2025-11-20	@	South Dakota State Jackrabbits	L	63 - 72
2025-11-23	vs	Eastern Washington Eagles	W	79 - 60
2025-11-28	vs	Indiana Hoosiers	L	72 - 76
2025-11-30	@	Marquette Golden Eagles	W	65 - 61
2025-12-04	vs	Grand Canyon Lopes	W	62 - 58
2025-12-06	vs	UC Davis Aggies	W	83 - 72
2025-12-16	vs	Arizona State Sun Devils	L	66 - 68
2025-12-19	@	Missouri State Lady Bears	W	68 - 49
2025-12-21	@	UC Riverside Highlanders	W	68 - 62
2025-12-28	vs	Loyola Marymount Lions	W	87 - 80
2025-12-30	vs	Pepperdine Waves	W	75 - 52
2026-01-02	@	Seattle U Redhawks	W	85 - 59
2026-01-04	@	Santa Clara Broncos	L	73 - 77
2026-01-10	vs	Portland Pilots	W	69 - 55
2026-01-15	vs	San Francisco Dons	W	82 - 69
2026-01-17	vs	San Diego Toreros	W	87 - 42
2026-01-22	@	Oregon State Beavers	L	87 - 92
2026-01-29	@	San Francisco Dons	W	74 - 66
2026-01-31	@	Washington State Cougars	W	81 - 75
2026-02-05	vs	Oregon State Beavers	W	67 - 37
2026-02-07	vs	Pacific Tigers	W	72 - 44
2026-02-12	@	San Diego Toreros	W	66 - 56
2026-02-14	@	Loyola Marymount Lions	L	63 - 72
2026-02-19	vs	Washington State Cougars	W	75 - 50
2026-02-21	@	Pacific Tigers	W	85 - 70
2026-02-26	vs	Saint Mary's Gaels	W	75 - 67
2026-02-28	@	Portland Pilots	L	91 - 92
2026-03-09	vs	Santa Clara Broncos	W	88 - 60
2026-03-10	vs	Oregon State Beavers	W	76 - 66
2026-03-20	@	Ole Miss Rebels	L	66 - 81

2026 Roster

Show Alumni

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM GP	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
Lauren Whittaker	F	34	26.4	19.1	10.2	1.2	1.3	0.4	2.7	13.1	16.5	217	30	7.2	11.5	53.6	35.5	79.1	3.57	62.2	57.3
Allie Turner	G	34	33.7	14.8	2.5	3.5	0.6	0.2	2.7	10.8	8.1	192	30	6.4	8.1	44.8	47.1	95.6	0.79	62.0	57.0
Zeryhia Aokuso	G	34	23.7	8.4	2.6	2.2	0.7	0.0	2.5	7.8	3.6	120	30	4.0	7.3	40.5	32.6	80.9	0.03	48.3	43.4
Jaiden Haile	F	34	19.2	7.1	6.4	1.3	0.4	0.3	1.1	5.2	9.1	138	30	4.6	10.3	54.8	0.0	50.5	2.7	55.3	54.8
Ines Bettencourt	G	33	26.2	6.3	3.4	3.0	1.5	0.3	2.2	6.8	5.5	188	29	6.5	10.4	34.4	31.8	71.1	2.76	43.4	40.6
Teryn Gardner	G	34	19.9	6.0	3.1	1.1	0.7	0.1	0.9	4.6	5.4	138	30	4.6	10.0	43.9	46.0	93.8	0.87	62.6	60.6
Taylor Smith	F	34	23.1	5.6	3.7	2.7	1.1	0.6	2.0	5.1	6.6	135	30	4.5	8.3	48.3	5.9	77.8	0.86	51.1	48.6
Sierra Lichtie	F	20	10.7	2.9	1.9	0.6	0.5	0.1	0.9	2.5	2.6	-15	18	-0.8	-3.3	42.9	22.2	86.7	-5.53	51.3	44.9
Paige Lofing	G	27	6.4	2.2	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.4	1.9	0.8	26	22	1.2	6.5	36.0	42.1	63.6	-1.64	53.8	52.0
Julia Wilson	G	31	10.5	2.0	1.1	0.9	0.4	0.1	0.5	1.9	2.0	11	27	0.4	1.6	38.3	42.9	58.8	-3.92	45.9	43.3
McKynnlie Dalan	F	26	8.2	1.6	1.8	0.3	0.3	0.1	0.7	1.5	1.9	15	22	0.7	3.7	30.0	33.3	81.0	-0.68	42.6	31.2
Christabel Osarobo	G	29	5.9	0.8	0.7	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.3	1.0	0.7	40	24	1.7	10.6	30.0	8.3	75.0	-1.34	34.6	31.7
Vera Gunaydin	G	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2025-2026 Shot Zones

2030 located field-goal attempts in 34 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Points: who the team's points here most likely come from

Misses: who misses most here

Lauren WhittakerAllie TurnerZeryhia AokusoTeryn GardnerInes BettencourtTaylor Smith

Zone	FGM-FGA	FG%	Pts	Top scorer	Runner-up	Most misses	Runner-up
Restricted area	227-344	66.0	454	Lauren Whittaker 40% (182 pts)	Jaiden Haile 16% (74 pts)	Lauren Whittaker 25% (29 misses)	Allie Turner 16% (19 misses)
Paint (non-RA)	311-659	47.2	622	Lauren Whittaker 32% (202 pts)	Jaiden Haile 15% (92 pts)	Lauren Whittaker 26% (89 misses)	Zeryhia Aokuso 16% (56 misses)
Mid-range left	53-148	35.8	106	Zeryhia Aokuso 34% (36 pts)	Allie Turner 21% (22 pts)	Zeryhia Aokuso 29% (28 misses)	Allie Turner 16% (15 misses)
Mid-range center	45-117	38.5	90	Taylor Smith 20% (18 pts)	Allie Turner 18% (16 pts)	Taylor Smith 21% (15 misses)	Allie Turner 19% (14 misses)
Mid-range right	42-146	28.8	84	Allie Turner 24% (20 pts)	Ines Bettencourt 14% (12 pts)	Allie Turner 19% (20 misses)	Zeryhia Aokuso 17% (18 misses)
Left corner 3	20-57	35.1	60	Allie Turner 35% (21 pts)	Teryn Gardner 25% (15 pts)	Allie Turner 35% (13 misses)	Teryn Gardner 22% (8 misses)
Right corner 3	29-61	47.5	87	Teryn Gardner 38% (33 pts)	Allie Turner 28% (24 pts)	Allie Turner 22% (7 misses)	Teryn Gardner 22% (7 misses)
Above-break 3 left	76-200	38.0	228	Allie Turner 38% (87 pts)	Teryn Gardner 17% (39 pts)	Ines Bettencourt 21% (26 misses)	Lauren Whittaker 19% (24 misses)
Above-break 3 center	31-94	33.0	93	Lauren Whittaker 35% (33 pts)	Allie Turner 23% (21 pts)	Lauren Whittaker 40% (25 misses)	Allie Turner 14% (9 misses)
Above-break 3 right	84-204	41.2	252	Allie Turner 42% (105 pts)	Teryn Gardner 23% (57 pts)	Allie Turner 39% (47 misses)	Ines Bettencourt 16% (19 misses)