Golden State Valkyries
Also known as: Golden State Valkyries
Program History
2026 Team Stats (1 games)
78.0
PPG
76.9
Opp
+5.6
Margin
45.8%
FG%
45.5%
3P%
56.3%
FT%
35.0
RPG
16.0
APG
18.0
TO
84.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1196 (#2) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1144 (#2) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1158 (#1) | HCA +51 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +5.7 (#2) | HCA +1.6 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +7.6 (#2) | HCA +1.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.726 (#2) | - |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.624 (#3) | AdjO 82.2 | AdjD 76.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.726 (#2) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.722 (#2) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1211 (#1) | RD 85 | GP 27 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-25 | vs | Seattle Storm | W | 78 - 76 |
| 2026-05-08 | @ | Seattle Storm | W | 91 - 80 |
| 2026-05-10 | vs | Phoenix Mercury | W | 95 - 79 |
| 2026-05-13 | vs | Chicago Sky | L | 63 - 69 |
| 2026-05-21 | @ | New York Liberty | W | 87 - 70 |
| 2026-05-22 | @ | Indiana Fever | L | 82 - 90 |
| 2026-05-25 | vs | Connecticut Sun | W | 97 - 70 |
| 2026-05-28 | vs | Indiana Fever | W | 90 - 88 |
| 2026-05-31 | vs | Las Vegas Aces | L | 81 - 91 |
| 2026-06-02 | vs | Portland Fire | W | 95 - 77 |
| 2026-06-04 | @ | Minnesota Lynx | L | 84 - 87 |
| 2026-06-06 | @ | Las Vegas Aces | L | 79 - 84 |
| 2026-06-09 | vs | Phoenix Mercury | W | 87 - 81 |
| 2026-06-12 | @ | Seattle Storm | W | 76 - 72 |
| 2026-06-15 | vs | Los Angeles Sparks | W | 78 - 58 |
| 2026-06-17 | vs | Dallas Wings | W | 91 - 80 |
| 2026-06-19 | vs | Minnesota Lynx | L | 75 - 81 |
| 2026-06-21 | @ | Las Vegas Aces | L | 73 - 92 |
| 2026-06-24 | vs | Atlanta Dream | W | 77 - 66 |
| 2026-06-26 | vs | Atlanta Dream | W | 78 - 75 |
| 2026-06-28 | vs | New York Liberty | W | 76 - 67 |
| 2026-07-04 | @ | Atlanta Dream | W | 88 - 83 |
| 2026-07-06 | @ | Washington Mystics | W | 62 - 49 |
| 2026-07-08 | @ | Toronto Tempo | W | 83 - 75 |
| 2026-07-10 | @ | Connecticut Sun | W | 79 - 64 |
| 2026-07-15 | @ | Indiana Fever | W | 88 - 75 |
| 2026-07-18 | vs | Washington Mystics | W | 74 - 69 |
| 2026-07-20 | vs | Washington Mystics | L | 82 - 90 |
| 2026-07-29 | @ | Phoenix Mercury | L | 89 - 91 |
| 2026-08-02 | vs | Toronto Tempo | W | 96 - 79 |
| 2026-08-04 | vs | Toronto Tempo | - | Preview |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Goodchild
|
- | 1 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 83.3 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 116.7 | 116.7 |
Veronica Burton
|
G | 1 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 57.1 | 100.0 | - | 88.8 | 85.7 |
K. Chen
|
G | 1 | 29.0 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 55.7 | 55.6 |
Kate Martin
|
G | 1 | 23.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 40.0 | 50.0 | - | 51.5 | 50.0 |
Kayla Thornton
|
F | 1 | 15.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 20.0 | 0 | - | 43.8 | 43.8 |
Tiffany Hayes
|
G | 1 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 62.5 | 62.5 |
M. Fasoula
|
- | 1 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 83.3 |
M. Suarez
|
- | 1 | 14.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Laeticia Amihere
|
F | 1 | 15.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | - | 22.2 | 20.0 |
C. Ducharme
|
- | 1 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
C. Reese
|
- | 1 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 53.2 | 0.0 |
A. Jackson
|
- | 1 | 26.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 26.6 | 0.0 |
Kiah Stokes
|
C | 1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
N. Mwenentanda
|
- | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG