Gettysburg
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1168 (#14) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1184 (#39) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +20.1 (#25) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.951 (#200) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.974 (#30) | NetEff +26.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.985 (#127) | AdjNet +36.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.986 (#129) | AdjNet +35.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.859 (#145) | AdjO 71.6 | AdjD 51.7 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | @ | Eastern | W | 78 - 42 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Randolph-Macon | W | 79 - 47 |
| 2024-11-17 | @ | Roanoke | W | 91 - 69 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | Penn St.-Altoona | W | 84 - 48 |
| 2024-11-22 | @ | SUNY Cobleskill | W | 70 - 61 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Marymount (VA) | W | 62 - 47 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | York (PA) | W | 59 - 44 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | Messiah | W | 61 - 47 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Franklin & Marshall | W | 70 - 51 |
| 2024-12-20 | vs | Williams | L | 54 - 58 |
| 2024-12-21 | @ | Emerson | W | 66 - 49 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Susquehanna | W | 75 - 52 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Washington Col. | W | 66 - 47 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Johns Hopkins | W | 54 - 44 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Franklin & Marshall | W | 65 - 42 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Ursinus | W | 60 - 53 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Dickinson | W | 60 - 41 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Swarthmore | W | 71 - 35 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | McDaniel | W | 61 - 46 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Johns Hopkins | L | 51 - 59 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Muhlenberg | W | 89 - 42 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Dickinson | W | 59 - 39 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Haverford | W | 71 - 33 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | McDaniel | W | 68 - 52 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Bryn Mawr | W | 84 - 42 |
| 2025-02-28 | vs | Washington Col. | W | 58 - 39 |
| 2025-03-02 | @ | Johns Hopkins | W | 68 - 60 |
| 2025-03-07 | vs | Stevens | W | 64 - 46 |
| 2025-03-08 | vs | Western New Eng. | W | 55 - 52 |
| 2025-03-14 | @ | Randolph-Macon | W | 56 - 49 |
| 2025-03-15 | vs | NYU | L | 51 - 76 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alayna Arnolie | - | 30 | 29.7 | 14.3 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 14.8 | 5.7 | 129 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 39.2 | 26.8 | 76.2 | 0.94 | 46.4 | 44.7 |
| Shinya Lee | - | 31 | 25.5 | 10.3 | 9.9 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 8.4 | 15.9 | 112 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 52.5 | 100.0 | 58.4 | 0.93 | 54.3 | 52.7 |
| AB Holsinger | - | 31 | 27.1 | 7.6 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 82 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 44.6 | 42.2 | 74.0 | 0.6 | 54.9 | 51.6 |
| Jameson Mott | - | 31 | 16.7 | 6.9 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 86 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 38.0 | 36.1 | 74.1 | 0.97 | 49.6 | 47.6 |
| Emily Violante | - | 28 | 22.3 | 6.0 | 5.6 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 8.5 | 59 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 50.5 | 25.0 | 84.8 | 0.28 | 60.5 | 50.9 |
| Mackenzie Szlosek | - | 8 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 59.3 | 16.7 | 100.0 | -0.06 | 67.2 | 61.1 |
| Reagan Chrencik | - | 31 | 12.0 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 4.9 | 17 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 43.5 | 20.0 | 73.1 | 0.15 | 53.1 | 44.9 |
| Kimberly Hopkins | - | 31 | 16.1 | 4.2 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 4.4 | 2.1 | 56 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 32.1 | 27.3 | 79.5 | 0.65 | 41.3 | 34.3 |
| Ava O'Neil | - | 31 | 13.4 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 56 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 30.8 | 28.8 | 72.7 | 0.58 | 40.9 | 38.9 |
| Skylar Reale | - | 31 | 14.6 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 49 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 38.6 | 30.0 | 55.8 | 0.56 | 45.5 | 40.7 |
| Tatum Murray | - | 29 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 10 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 36.4 | 27.3 | 50.0 | 0.08 | 46.3 | 45.5 |
| Amanda Rapel | - | 28 | 5.3 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 28.6 | 32.1 | 70.0 | -0.34 | 41.2 | 37.8 |
| Adeline Standish | - | 31 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 38 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 47.6 | 0 | 83.3 | 0.46 | 50.4 | 47.6 |
| Briana Robles | - | 31 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | -36 | -1.4 | -5.0 | 29.0 | 26.7 | 73.3 | -0.01 | 43.9 | 35.5 |
| Sarah Bertolette | - | 19 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | -8 | -0.7 | -3.1 | 40.0 | 0 | 33.3 | -0.15 | 39.8 | 40.0 |
| Sireen Maharmeh | - | 29 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 8 | 0.7 | 7.6 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.19 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
| Colleen McGovern | - | 22 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Mia Raymond | - | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG