๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Georgetown

2026-2027 Team Stats (4 games)

82.5
PPG
56.8
Opp
+25.8
Margin
45.8%
FG%
36.8%
3P%
77.2%
FT%
39.5
RPG
15.0
APG
14.0
TO
71.4
Est. poss./game
70.4
Adj PPG
57.8
Adj Opp PPG
#71
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 1069 (returning production + recruiting): last season 977, returning -22, transfers +114, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 1066 (#124) Preseason prior 1069 (returning production + recruiting): last season 977, returning -22, transfers +114, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 1051 (#119) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 1049 (#120) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ +13.7 (#68) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More โ†’ +13.7 (#68) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.912 (#57) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +19.7 More โ†’ 0.793 (#63) AdjNet +19.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +21.2 More โ†’ 0.818 (#61) AdjNet +21.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 70.4 | AdjD 57.8 More โ†’ 0.708 (#71) AdjO 70.4 | AdjD 57.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 70.5 | AdjD 57.9 More โ†’ 0.707 (#71) AdjO 70.5 | AdjD 57.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.733 (#80) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.733 (#80) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 174 | GP 4 More โ†’ 1065 (#115) RD 174 | GP 4
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.699 (#90) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 vs Delaware State Hornets W 84 - 47
2026-11-05 vs American University Eagles W 75 - 65
2026-11-08 vs Saint Peter's Peacocks W 97 - 37
2026-11-11 @ George Washington Revolutionaries L 74 - 78
2026-11-15 vs Howard Bison - Preview
2026-11-19 @ NC State Wolfpack - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Destiny Agubata Destiny Agubata G 4 20.5 15.2 6.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 2.0 10.8 9.2 43 4 10.8 21.4 46.5 42.9 90.0 -0.9 64.3 60.5
Khia Miller Khia Miller G 4 24.5 14.0 2.8 0.8 1.8 0.0 1.5 10.0 7.8 56 4 14.0 23.1 45.0 38.5 93.8 -0.89 59.5 51.2
Brianna Byars Brianna Byars F 4 27.2 12.2 6.8 2.0 1.0 0.2 1.5 8.0 12.8 54 4 13.5 19.8 53.1 60.0 70.6 -0.22 62.1 57.8
Amanda Ajobiewe Amanda Ajobiewe G 4 23.2 10.2 2.0 0.8 0.5 0.0 1.2 9.0 3.2 60 4 15.0 25.6 41.7 16.7 69.2 1.89 49.1 44.4
Kendall Perry Kendall Perry G 4 18.0 7.0 1.2 1.5 1.0 0.0 1.2 3.5 6.0 58 4 14.5 31.8 42.9 40.0 87.5 2.59 66.5 50.0
Winner Bartholomew Winner Bartholomew F 4 18.2 6.5 2.5 1.2 0.2 0.0 1.8 5.0 3.8 32 4 8.0 17.7 60.0 0.0 40.0 -1.38 58.6 60.0
Stella Lockhart Stella Lockhart F 4 15.2 6.5 3.2 0.8 0.5 0.2 1.2 4.8 5.2 42 4 10.5 28.7 52.6 30.0 75.0 2.82 62.6 60.5
Johnea Donahue Johnea Donahue G 4 26.2 4.2 5.2 6.2 3.8 1.0 1.2 4.8 14.5 62 4 15.5 24.0 26.3 20.0 100.0 3.43 39.3 28.9
Bo Frost Bo Frost G 4 10.2 4.2 2.5 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.8 2.5 4.2 40 4 10.0 40.7 60.0 57.1 50.0 2.17 78.1 80.0
JBionna Robinson JBionna Robinson G 4 5.0 1.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.0 2.2 8 4 2.0 15.3 25.0 0.0 50.0 -1.25 39.9 25.0
Clarence Djuela Clarence Djuela F 4 9.8 0.8 2.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 3.2 62 4 15.5 64.2 0.0 0 75.0 3.39 31.5 0.0
Corrie McLaughlin Corrie McLaughlin F 2 3.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 3 2 1.5 16.1 0 0 0 -1.57 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

240 located field-goal attempts in 4 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Byars21% Ajobiewe23% Ajobiewe33% Agubata33% Miller38% Donahue33% Miller40% Agubata38% Agubata50% Agubata50%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Byars26% Miller24% Ajobiewe50% Ajobiewe25% Bartholomew40% Agubata50% Agubata50% Ajobiewe38% Agubata33% Lockhart28%
Misses: who misses most here

Destiny AgubataKhia MillerBrianna ByarsAmanda AjobieweWinner BartholomewStella LockhartJohnea Donahue

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 42-73 57.5 84 Brianna Byars 21% (18 pts) Khia Miller 19% (16 pts) Brianna Byars 26% (8 misses) Khia Miller 16% (5 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 22-55 40.0 44 Amanda Ajobiewe 23% (10 pts) Brianna Byars 23% (10 pts) Khia Miller 24% (8 misses) Destiny Agubata 18% (6 misses)
Mid-range left 3-5 60.0 6 Amanda Ajobiewe 33% (2 pts) Destiny Agubata 33% (2 pts) Amanda Ajobiewe 50% (1 misses) Brianna Byars 50% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 3-7 42.9 6 Destiny Agubata 33% (2 pts) Khia Miller 33% (2 pts) Amanda Ajobiewe 25% (1 misses) Brianna Byars 25% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 8-13 61.5 16 Khia Miller 38% (6 pts) Amanda Ajobiewe 25% (4 pts) Winner Bartholomew 40% (2 misses) Amanda Ajobiewe 20% (1 misses)
Left corner 3 3-11 27.3 9 Johnea Donahue 33% (3 pts) Kendall Perry 33% (3 pts) Destiny Agubata 50% (4 misses) Amanda Ajobiewe 25% (2 misses)
Right corner 3 5-9 55.6 15 Khia Miller 40% (6 pts) Bo Frost 20% (3 pts) Destiny Agubata 50% (2 misses) Khia Miller 25% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 8-21 38.1 24 Destiny Agubata 38% (9 pts) Khia Miller 25% (6 pts) Amanda Ajobiewe 38% (5 misses) Destiny Agubata 23% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 center 6-18 33.3 18 Destiny Agubata 50% (9 pts) Stella Lockhart 33% (6 pts) Destiny Agubata 33% (4 misses) Amanda Ajobiewe 25% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 right 10-28 35.7 30 Destiny Agubata 50% (15 pts) Amanda Ajobiewe 20% (6 pts) Stella Lockhart 28% (5 misses) Khia Miller 22% (4 misses)