George Washington
2023 Team Stats (20 games)
75.7
PPG
78.5
Opp
-1.3
Margin
45.8%
FG%
31.0%
3P%
72.6%
FT%
35.6
RPG
12.3
APG
12.5
TO
80.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1196 (#115) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1195 (#139) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +26.2 (#138) | HCA +2.8 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.328 (#270) | NetEff -6.7 |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-11 | vs | Howard Bison | W | 85 - 75 |
| 2022-11-22 | vs | UC San Diego Tritons | L | 70 - 75 |
| 2022-11-26 | vs | New Hampshire Wildcats | W | 75 - 54 |
| 2022-11-30 | vs | South Carolina Gamecocks | W | 79 - 55 |
| 2022-12-25 | vs | Seattle U Redhawks | L | 67 - 85 |
| 2023-01-04 | @ | Richmond Spiders | L | 63 - 73 |
| 2023-01-07 | vs | Massachusetts Minutemen | W | 81 - 73 |
| 2023-01-14 | vs | Saint Louis Billikens | L | 74 - 81 |
| 2023-01-16 | @ | George Mason Patriots | W | 78 - 75 |
| 2023-01-21 | vs | Dayton Flyers | W | 76 - 69 |
| 2023-01-25 | vs | Saint Joseph's Hawks | W | 92 - 91 |
| 2023-01-28 | @ | Fordham Rams | L | 70 - 85 |
| 2023-02-01 | @ | La Salle Explorers | L | 64 - 75 |
| 2023-02-04 | vs | Duquesne Dukes | L | 67 - 93 |
| 2023-02-08 | vs | Richmond Spiders | W | 107 - 105 |
| 2023-02-19 | @ | St. Bonaventure Bonnies | W | 83 - 81 |
| 2023-02-25 | vs | La Salle Explorers | W | 92 - 85 |
| 2023-03-04 | vs | VCU Rams | L | 68 - 74 |
| 2023-03-08 | vs | Saint Joseph's Hawks | L | 76 - 87 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Bishop IV
|
- | 19 | 37.7 | 19.9 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 3.4 | 15.1 | 9.9 | 35 | 5.0 | 12.1 | 40.8 | 29.0 | 82.4 | 0.93 | 58.3 | 46.2 |
B. Adams
|
- | 19 | 37.9 | 18.6 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 11.3 | 12.9 | - | - | - | 45.3 | 40.4 | 81.7 | - | 72.0 | 55.6 |
M. Edwards
|
- | 19 | 34.6 | 11.3 | 7.2 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 8.2 | 10.8 | -25 | -2.1 | -5.5 | 43.9 | 36.8 | 59.4 | 0.39 | 63.6 | 52.9 |
R. Lindo Jr.
|
- | 19 | 31.2 | 11.2 | 8.0 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 5.9 | 15.0 | 34 | 3.1 | 5.5 | 56.2 | 19.4 | 67.9 | 1.51 | 77.6 | 59.4 |
H. Dean
|
- | 19 | 27.4 | 8.7 | 6.2 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 12.1 | - | - | - | 56.3 | 0.0 | 76.1 | - | 76.9 | 56.3 |
E. Clark
|
G | 4 | 18.5 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 398.9 | 0.0 |
K. Harvey
|
F | 4 | 6.5 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 3.5 | -5 | -0.5 | -0.6 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 50.0 | 0.38 | 82.5 | 64.3 |
N. Brown
|
- | 19 | 11.0 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 53.8 | 0 | 47.6 | - | 56.0 | 53.8 |
Q. Samuels
|
- | 19 | 6.6 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 35.0 | 14.3 | 57.1 | - | 75.8 | 40.0 |
A. Harris
|
- | 18 | 13.9 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 9.1 | 62.5 | - | 46.5 | 38.6 |
Laziz Talipov
|
- | 3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
T. Stamoulis
|
- | 3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | -0.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG