Gannon
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1313 (#7) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1320 (#10) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1230 (#7) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +21.1 (#17) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +18.9 (#106) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.953 (#153) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.975 (#91) | NetEff +26.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.974 (#113) | AdjNet +31.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.976 (#113) | AdjNet +31.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.856 (#124) | AdjO 71.8 | AdjD 52.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.810 (#25) | AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 51.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.903 (#29) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.901 (#27) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1373 (#7) | RD 110 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-07 | vs | Union (TN) | W | 66 - 51 |
| 2025-11-08 | vs | Northern Mich. | L | 58 - 60 |
| 2025-11-09 | vs | North Georgia | W | 70 - 55 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Davis & Elkins | W | 90 - 37 |
| 2025-11-16 | vs | Charleston (WV) | W | 68 - 43 |
| 2025-11-19 | @ | Daemen | W | 57 - 50 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | Saginaw Valley | W | 59 - 53 |
| 2025-11-26 | @ | Hawaii Hilo | W | 54 - 31 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | Shepherd | W | 68 - 51 |
| 2025-12-16 | vs | Kutztown | W | 70 - 48 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | West Chester | W | 82 - 61 |
| 2025-12-21 | @ | Millersville | W | 56 - 45 |
| 2026-01-02 | vs | Shippensburg | W | 62 - 30 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Lock Haven | W | 74 - 51 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | California (PA) | W | 82 - 46 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Seton Hill | W | 83 - 57 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Indiana (PA) | L | 63 - 68 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Pitt.-Johnstown | W | 75 - 60 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | Clarion | W | 83 - 74 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Slippery Rock | W | 72 - 51 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | California (PA) | W | 72 - 51 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bri Claxon | - | 21 | 28.9 | 16.5 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 13.7 | 7.9 | 194 | 8.1 | 27.5 | 47.4 | 34.6 | 82.6 | 5.34 | 56.5 | 53.8 |
| Kate Ratliff | - | 21 | 28.1 | 11.5 | 5.5 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 171 | 7.1 | 22.3 | 39.1 | 31.9 | 86.4 | -0.34 | 50.0 | 44.2 |
| Mia Slater | - | 21 | 17.6 | 9.0 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 7.2 | 7.7 | 131 | 5.7 | 36.0 | 52.6 | 25.0 | 64.7 | 1.26 | 56.3 | 54.6 |
| Jordan Popyk | - | 20 | 19.7 | 8.9 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 7.2 | 7.6 | 117 | 5.3 | 20.9 | 50.0 | 31.6 | 58.3 | -0.24 | 53.9 | 52.1 |
| Maddy Wheatley | - | 21 | 26.5 | 8.2 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 7.0 | 9.8 | 180 | 7.5 | 26.8 | 38.5 | 36.4 | 89.7 | 0.96 | 52.4 | 46.6 |
| Olivia Pepple | - | 18 | 21.9 | 5.0 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 102 | 5.1 | 32.3 | 37.5 | 38.5 | 93.9 | -4.22 | 52.0 | 41.0 |
| Olivia Cernuto | - | 15 | 16.5 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 130 | 7.2 | 56.8 | 36.7 | 26.3 | 61.5 | -0.33 | 45.5 | 40.8 |
| Bella Deere | - | 21 | 13.0 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 81 | 3.5 | 28.3 | 39.1 | 25.0 | 93.8 | 1.83 | 50.6 | 44.9 |
| Carissa Dunham | - | 4 | 12.4 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 3.5 | -3 | -0.6 | -2.8 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 50.0 | -2.1 | 63.5 | 64.3 |
| Tori Mayes | - | 21 | 24.1 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 5.2 | 149 | 6.2 | 24.4 | 31.6 | 32.0 | 77.3 | 2.67 | 51.4 | 42.1 |
| Katie Boal | - | 11 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.2 | -8 | -0.7 | -45.6 | 60.0 | 0 | 75.0 | 0.66 | 63.8 | 60.0 |
| Lauren Kingsley | - | 18 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.7 | -9 | -0.5 | -22.7 | 39.1 | 0.0 | 66.7 | -1.26 | 42.9 | 39.1 |
| Taylor Ethridge | - | 16 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 17 | 1.0 | 19.7 | 11.8 | 0.0 | 83.3 | 1.62 | 22.9 | 11.8 |
| Jenna Winowiecki | - | 11 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | -0.8 | -9 | -0.8 | -61.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.83 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG