Gallaudet
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 899 (#405) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 822 (#525) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 919 (#592) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -29.0 (#389) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -27.8 (#662) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.426 (#481) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.012 (#553) | NetEff -28.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.054 (#596) | AdjNet -24.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.045 (#600) | AdjNet -25.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.192 (#592) | AdjO 57.8 | AdjD 73.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.213 (#659) | AdjO 50.6 | AdjD 65.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.108 (#657) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.121 (#654) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 820 (#481) | RD 107 | GP 20 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-09 | vs | Washington Adventist | L | 56 - 93 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Penn St.-Abington | L | 55 - 78 |
| 2025-11-19 | @ | Widener | L | 40 - 65 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Brooklyn | L | 40 - 76 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | Marymount (VA) | W | 62 - 61 |
| 2025-11-29 | @ | Salisbury | L | 40 - 114 |
| 2025-12-01 | vs | St. Mary's (MD) | L | 48 - 70 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | St. Mary's (MD) | L | 43 - 84 |
| 2025-12-15 | @ | Randolph | L | 58 - 84 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Penn St. Harrisburg | L | 75 - 78 |
| 2026-01-13 | vs | Lancaster Bible | W | 63 - 50 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Keystone | W | 50 - 41 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Penn St.-Berks | L | 55 - 58 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Wilson | L | 53 - 62 |
| 2026-01-29 | vs | Trinity Washington | W | 68 - 30 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Valley Forge | W | 78 - 21 |
| 2026-02-04 | @ | Cairn | W | 67 - 48 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Penn St.-Abington | L | 33 - 91 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalie Greene | - | 15 | 25.5 | 15.5 | 8.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 14.8 | 8.6 | -90 | -9.0 | -88.5 | 40.1 | 0.0 | 64.3 | 0.68 | 44.8 | 40.1 |
| Sunita Schimdjorg | - | 1 | 27.0 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 33.3 | 33.3 | - | 55.8 | 61.1 |
| Mackenzie Schirg | - | 18 | 31.2 | 11.9 | 8.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 11.8 | 8.5 | -137 | -9.1 | -125.9 | 38.0 | 25.5 | 69.5 | -2.95 | 45.0 | 40.8 |
| Sophia Wascher | - | 15 | 29.8 | 8.6 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 4.4 | 8.1 | 5.0 | -79 | -6.1 | -68.2 | 41.3 | 0 | 53.7 | 1.2 | 44.6 | 41.3 |
| Sunita Schmidjorg | - | 8 | 27.0 | 7.5 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.8 | 10.1 | -58 | -8.3 | -49.9 | 38.7 | 31.6 | 75.0 | -0.13 | 45.8 | 43.5 |
| Seanna Baird | - | 18 | 29.1 | 6.1 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 4.9 | 7.6 | 0.7 | -197 | -14.1 | -148.1 | 31.6 | 31.9 | 75.0 | -0.45 | 38.9 | 37.1 |
| Kayla Debrow | - | 10 | 22.0 | 5.5 | 9.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 5.4 | 10.9 | 12 | 0.7 | 10.5 | 29.6 | 0.0 | 65.7 | -2.6 | 39.6 | 29.6 |
| Tiana Starayev | - | 11 | 21.7 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 4.5 | 3.5 | -1.4 | -98 | -12.2 | -171.8 | 23.1 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -2.55 | 25.9 | 23.1 |
| Evangeline Diaz | - | 18 | 21.0 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 2.6 | -0.2 | -70 | -3.9 | -98.1 | 25.5 | 28.6 | 66.7 | -2.94 | 34.2 | 31.9 |
| Kate Aquino Uribe | - | 15 | 18.7 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 2.0 | -107 | -9.7 | -125.1 | 30.2 | 0 | 30.0 | -3.48 | 30.6 | 30.2 |
| Mariyah Saldana | - | 8 | 9.3 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | -60 | -12.0 | -325.1 | 30.8 | 25.0 | 25.0 | -1.85 | 33.9 | 34.6 |
| Hadassah Sklar | - | 8 | 6.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.8 | -0.2 | -30 | -6.0 | -90.3 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.66 | 14.3 | 14.3 |
| Dev Sklar | - | 9 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | -27 | -6.8 | -109.5 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -2.95 | 22.5 | 25.0 |
| Shanice Walters | - | 8 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | -0.6 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG