Franklin Pierce
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 929 (#351) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 852 (#385) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -7.7 (#285) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.154 (#508) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.108 (#382) | NetEff -19.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.218 (#538) | AdjNet -11.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.215 (#541) | AdjNet -11.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.305 (#553) | AdjO 75.4 | AdjD 84.5 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Post | L | 88 - 90 |
| 2024-11-10 | @ | Bridgeport | L | 92 - 96 |
| 2024-11-12 | @ | Rhode Island | L | 73 - 105 |
| 2024-11-15 | vs | Caldwell | L | 74 - 94 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | New Haven | L | 75 - 81 |
| 2024-11-17 | @ | Dominican (NY) | L | 72 - 82 |
| 2024-11-20 | @ | Assumption | L | 85 - 96 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Saint Anselm | L | 73 - 95 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | Adelphi | L | 59 - 87 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Southern N.H. | L | 66 - 84 |
| 2024-12-09 | @ | Mercy | W | 85 - 83 |
| 2024-12-14 | vs | Goldey-Beacom | L | 68 - 78 |
| 2025-01-03 | vs | Daemen | L | 70 - 87 |
| 2025-01-05 | vs | American Int'l | W | 80 - 70 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Pace | L | 71 - 82 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Saint Michael's | L | 60 - 82 |
| 2025-01-14 | vs | Bentley | L | 69 - 82 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Southern Conn. St. | L | 74 - 105 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Saint Anselm | L | 89 - 94 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | New Haven | W | 72 - 64 |
| 2025-01-28 | vs | Assumption | L | 88 - 94 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donte Pope | - | 21 | 29.8 | 21.1 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 15.0 | 12.0 | -179 | -7.5 | -12.7 | 50.3 | 37.6 | 81.9 | -0.31 | 60.7 | 55.4 |
| Demariontay Hall | - | 19 | 23.9 | 12.3 | 6.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 9.4 | 9.8 | -139 | -6.6 | -12.2 | 53.4 | 0.0 | 57.9 | 0.96 | 55.3 | 53.4 |
| Ja'Keese Kemp | - | 21 | 24.0 | 7.8 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 4.5 | -143 | -7.5 | -15.9 | 35.4 | 37.1 | 78.8 | -0.34 | 47.5 | 43.7 |
| Pierce Prendergast | - | 15 | 23.4 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 5.0 | 6.3 | -95 | -4.1 | -9.4 | 46.7 | 41.5 | 75.0 | 1.36 | 60.9 | 58.0 |
| Saeer Miller | - | 19 | 20.5 | 4.7 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 4.7 | -117 | -5.6 | -10.5 | 34.7 | 40.0 | 61.5 | -0.02 | 42.3 | 38.9 |
| Trevon Thomas | - | 17 | 12.0 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 3.2 | -59 | -3.9 | -11.9 | 46.9 | 36.4 | 80.0 | 0.61 | 65.0 | 59.2 |
| Caleb Gatewood | - | 20 | 9.6 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 3.4 | -76 | -6.9 | -27.4 | 57.9 | 0.0 | 52.6 | -0.06 | 58.1 | 57.9 |
| Nathaniel Smith | - | 21 | 12.3 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 0.6 | -29 | -2.1 | -12.6 | 29.1 | 22.0 | 75.0 | 0.21 | 40.7 | 34.3 |
| Michael Myrie | - | 12 | 9.6 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 37.5 | 30.0 | - | 40.5 | 41.2 |
| Henry White | - | 21 | 7.6 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 50 | 4.2 | 51.1 | 34.9 | 33.3 | 50.0 | -0.19 | 46.0 | 45.2 |
| Aboubacar Wague | - | 21 | 10.7 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 2.3 | -20 | -1.5 | -6.1 | 37.5 | 0.0 | 53.3 | -0.03 | 39.9 | 37.5 |
| Thomas Prendergast | - | 11 | 10.5 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 2.7 | -21 | -7.0 | -6.8 | 52.6 | 0.0 | 37.5 | 0.31 | 51.1 | 52.6 |
| Noah Toussaint | - | 19 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 12 | 1.3 | 21.2 | 32.0 | 12.5 | 76.5 | -0.47 | 46.2 | 34.0 |
| Devin Johnson | - | 20 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 72 | 6.0 | 330.4 | 26.7 | 20.0 | 75.0 | -0.88 | 38.8 | 33.3 |
| Nuno Neto | - | 20 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | -8 | -0.7 | -13.6 | 22.7 | 10.0 | 33.3 | -0.44 | 25.7 | 25.0 |
| Kareem Porter | - | 18 | 4.6 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 29 | 3.2 | 12.6 | 50.0 | 0 | 28.6 | 0.2 | 44.1 | 50.0 |
| Henry Herman | - | 12 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 85.2 | 0 |
| Fabrice Salvant | - | 18 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -12 | -3.0 | -276.9 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -1.58 | 41.0 | 50.0 |
| Zachary Watson | - | 18 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | -0.1 | 42 | 5.2 | 170.6 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.81 | 22.2 | 22.2 |
| Hayden Brown | - | 14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5 | 5.0 | 87.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.44 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Collins | - | 12 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Malachi Cooper | - | 14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.56 | 0 | 0 |
| Gavin Olsen | - | 14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG