Framingham St.
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1001 (#242) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 960 (#380) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1037 (#226) | HCA +62 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -4.3 (#236) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +1.3 (#349) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.791 (#316) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.676 (#289) | NetEff +5.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.556 (#364) | AdjNet +2.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.544 (#366) | AdjNet +1.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.516 (#362) | AdjO 66.3 | AdjD 65.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.665 (#165) | AdjO 69.3 | AdjD 61.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.568 (#317) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.594 (#301) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1021 (#286) | RD 101 | GP 21 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | @ | Salve Regina | W | 68 - 56 |
| 2025-11-12 | vs | Rivier | W | 82 - 53 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Brandeis | L | 64 - 74 |
| 2025-11-18 | @ | Wheaton (MA) | L | 75 - 79 |
| 2025-11-21 | @ | Lasell | L | 56 - 64 |
| 2025-11-25 | vs | Regis (MA) | W | 78 - 56 |
| 2025-12-03 | vs | Connecticut Col. | L | 72 - 73 |
| 2025-12-09 | @ | Clark (MA) | L | 62 - 80 |
| 2025-12-29 | @ | Curry | W | 70 - 64 |
| 2025-12-30 | @ | Keene St. | L | 69 - 103 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Fitchburg St. | W | 77 - 40 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Salem St. | L | 65 - 72 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Worcester St. | W | 80 - 52 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | MCLA | W | 89 - 24 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Bridgewater St. | L | 57 - 66 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Anna Maria | W | 80 - 54 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Westfield St. | W | 80 - 75 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Fitchburg St. | W | 86 - 34 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Salem St. | W | 77 - 57 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faith Greene | - | 13 | 23.9 | 16.7 | 7.8 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 13.8 | 12.0 | 101 | 7.2 | 31.3 | 47.8 | 37.5 | 65.5 | 3.29 | 53.1 | 50.3 |
| Jacqueline Schels | - | 19 | 34.7 | 15.4 | 8.4 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 10.6 | 15.7 | 131 | 7.7 | 25.7 | 43.1 | 32.1 | 88.5 | 3.41 | 59.1 | 49.8 |
| Kiara Cerruti | - | 19 | 31.2 | 13.6 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 12.6 | 4.8 | 206 | 12.1 | 43.5 | 38.8 | 29.2 | 67.9 | 1.36 | 48.9 | 46.0 |
| Abigail Martin | - | 17 | 31.4 | 8.1 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 6.4 | 11.8 | 84 | 6.0 | 24.9 | 46.3 | 16.7 | 78.3 | 1.48 | 53.4 | 46.8 |
| Kelsey Yelle | - | 18 | 24.1 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 6.6 | 7.8 | 52 | 3.2 | 15.7 | 44.9 | 0.0 | 40.4 | 1.34 | 45.1 | 44.9 |
| Zaria Anderson | - | 18 | 18.9 | 6.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 7.8 | 1.2 | 15 | 0.9 | 7.1 | 26.2 | 25.2 | 65.6 | -1.15 | 39.3 | 35.8 |
| Ava Mckeon | - | 11 | 22.1 | 5.5 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 72 | 4.2 | 22.4 | 29.2 | 34.4 | 84.6 | 3.47 | 51.3 | 40.6 |
| Shaelagh Green | - | 16 | 10.4 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 4.8 | 97 | 6.9 | 75.7 | 61.1 | 0 | 60.0 | 1.57 | 62.8 | 61.1 |
| Haleigh Cyrus | - | 11 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 36 | 4.0 | 64.1 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 71.4 | 1.23 | 38.2 | 33.3 |
| Lexie Reed | - | 1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.1 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Evi Higgins | - | 16 | 6.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 68 | 5.2 | 58.7 | 28.9 | 16.7 | 50.0 | 2.83 | 34.7 | 34.2 |
| Bridget Trainor | - | 12 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 40 | 3.3 | 72.4 | 20.8 | 20.0 | 60.0 | -0.12 | 32.4 | 29.2 |
| Bryanna Grant | - | 12 | 6.2 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 10 | 0.9 | 14.9 | 26.7 | 0 | 63.6 | 0.26 | 37.8 | 26.7 |
| Hailey Ring | - | 5 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 12 | 3.0 | 44.3 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.17 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Macy Vine | - | 3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | -1.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG