Florida Tech
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 898 (#321) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 854 (#327) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -4.7 (#252) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.177 (#498) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.073 (#344) | NetEff -20.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.375 (#451) | AdjNet -4.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.382 (#450) | AdjNet -4.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.454 (#442) | AdjO 64.4 | AdjD 66.4 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | @ | Ga. Southwestern | L | 61 - 85 |
| 2024-11-11 | vs | Fort Lauderdale | W | 90 - 47 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Flagler | W | 67 - 59 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | P.R.-Mayaguez | W | 76 - 73 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Saint Leo | L | 72 - 84 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Rollins | W | 58 - 56 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Embry-Riddle (FL) | L | 51 - 83 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Fla. Southern | L | 55 - 72 |
| 2024-12-17 | vs | Eckerd | L | 37 - 52 |
| 2024-12-20 | vs | Flagler | L | 67 - 78 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Clayton St. | L | 54 - 79 |
| 2025-01-04 | @ | Barry | L | 48 - 62 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Lynn | W | 68 - 65 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Tampa | L | 59 - 83 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Nova Southeastern | L | 45 - 72 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Palm Beach Atl. | L | 57 - 84 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Fla. Southern | L | 54 - 88 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | Embry-Riddle (FL) | L | 51 - 67 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Eckerd | L | 48 - 77 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Rollins | W | 71 - 67 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Barry | L | 58 - 88 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Lynn | L | 59 - 74 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Tampa | L | 68 - 69 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Nova Southeastern | L | 42 - 81 |
| 2025-02-26 | vs | Palm Beach Atl. | L | 65 - 73 |
| 2025-03-01 | @ | Saint Leo | W | 62 - 58 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tai Roberts | - | 25 | 30.5 | 11.9 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 11.4 | 5.8 | -234 | -6.2 | -6.5 | 35.9 | 29.5 | 81.5 | -0.6 | 45.8 | 39.1 |
| Mikayla Morin | - | 24 | 16.4 | 7.3 | 4.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 8.0 | 3.4 | -81 | -2.3 | -4.5 | 40.8 | 0 | 71.4 | -0.16 | 43.3 | 40.8 |
| Kyandra Poitier | - | 25 | 23.6 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 8.2 | 7.3 | -49 | -2.0 | -2.9 | 32.7 | 12.5 | 60.8 | 0.11 | 38.1 | 33.2 |
| Sarah Liberatore | - | 26 | 24.8 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 8.2 | 0.0 | -96 | -4.0 | -5.0 | 25.2 | 25.9 | 74.6 | -0.56 | 37.7 | 32.0 |
| Dalma Ehmann | - | 26 | 11.9 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 3.4 | -51 | -2.0 | -4.8 | 50.9 | 0.0 | 54.0 | -0.36 | 53.0 | 50.9 |
| Nadine Johnson | - | 26 | 18.6 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 5.4 | 3.7 | -49 | -2.0 | -2.8 | 34.3 | 20.0 | 69.4 | 0.07 | 41.8 | 36.1 |
| Breazia Robinson | - | 11 | 12.0 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 16 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 56.1 | 0 | 73.3 | 0.46 | 59.9 | 56.1 |
| Divine Guthrie | - | 26 | 17.2 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 3.2 | -58 | -2.3 | -4.3 | 35.1 | 0 | 66.1 | -0.32 | 41.4 | 35.1 |
| Emily Acampora | - | 21 | 26.2 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 3.9 | 3.7 | -52 | -2.6 | -3.6 | 32.9 | 27.6 | 80.0 | -0.35 | 46.3 | 42.7 |
| Remingtyn Smith | - | 22 | 18.0 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 2.4 | -132 | -4.4 | -5.7 | 27.3 | 22.2 | 66.7 | -0.28 | 36.1 | 31.3 |
| Jessica Lange | - | 23 | 6.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.2 | -43 | -2.3 | -7.8 | 36.1 | 0 | 83.3 | -0.09 | 40.1 | 36.1 |
| Deirdre Miller | - | 22 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | -14 | -0.9 | -2.6 | 54.5 | 0 | 66.7 | -0.29 | 56.8 | 54.5 |
| Sydney Logsdon | - | 25 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.0 | -80 | -3.5 | -10.5 | 40.0 | 14.3 | 0 | -0.11 | 43.3 | 43.3 |
| Esra Sen | - | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Mckenzie Winder | - | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -31 | -1.2 | -5.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| Lana Ammash | - | 23 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG