Florida Tech
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 891 (#454) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 889 (#444) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 921 (#594) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -6.7 (#232) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -4.8 (#435) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.177 (#498) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.146 (#383) | NetEff -13.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.375 (#451) | AdjNet -4.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.382 (#450) | AdjNet -4.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.454 (#442) | AdjO 64.4 | AdjD 66.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.367 (#565) | AdjO 59.4 | AdjD 65.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.354 (#482) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.351 (#488) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 909 (#363) | RD 101 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-06 | @ | Jacksonville | L | 47 - 75 |
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Edward Waters | W | 70 - 65 |
| 2025-11-19 | @ | USC Beaufort | L | 80 - 82 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Palm Beach Atl. | L | 53 - 57 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | Flagler | W | 86 - 75 |
| 2025-11-28 | @ | Bemidji St. | L | 58 - 68 |
| 2025-11-29 | @ | Davis & Elkins | W | 69 - 66 |
| 2025-12-03 | @ | Rollins | W | 57 - 54 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Saint Leo | L | 70 - 73 |
| 2025-12-16 | vs | Eckerd | L | 42 - 75 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Southern N.H. | L | 62 - 80 |
| 2025-12-21 | vs | Mercy | L | 56 - 73 |
| 2025-12-31 | vs | Embry-Riddle (FL) | L | 63 - 69 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Tampa | L | 66 - 87 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Fla. Southern | L | 52 - 72 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Nova Southeastern | L | 50 - 74 |
| 2026-01-21 | vs | Barry | W | 55 - 37 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Tampa | L | 54 - 72 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Embry-Riddle (FL) | W | 80 - 77 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Saint Leo | W | 77 - 74 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Rollins | L | 51 - 53 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Eckerd | L | 42 - 84 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tai Roberts | - | 22 | 35.8 | 13.6 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 11.9 | 7.1 | -183 | -8.7 | -35.1 | 37.5 | 27.7 | 84.2 | -0.08 | 49.4 | 42.0 |
| Nandinkhusel Nyamjav | - | 14 | 35.1 | 12.6 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 11.9 | 7.8 | -43 | -3.6 | -34.7 | 38.6 | 29.0 | 77.5 | 2.42 | 48.2 | 44.0 |
| Elif Dila Bayrak | - | 21 | 32.5 | 12.0 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 11.8 | 5.5 | -159 | -8.0 | -31.9 | 34.4 | 29.2 | 86.8 | -0.13 | 48.0 | 44.5 |
| Nadine Johnson | - | 1 | 21.1 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 32 | 4.0 | 22.1 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | -1.23 | 62.5 | 62.5 |
| Amanda Ogbonna | - | 22 | 19.3 | 8.3 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 7.5 | 5.8 | -124 | -6.2 | -36.9 | 42.8 | 0.0 | 65.6 | -1.32 | 47.2 | 42.8 |
| Mikayla Morin | - | 22 | 12.4 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 5.4 | 4.5 | -29 | -1.4 | -20.0 | 44.5 | 0 | 69.0 | 1.4 | 47.8 | 44.5 |
| Remingtyn Smith | - | 22 | 27.2 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 5.1 | -158 | -7.5 | -55.0 | 27.2 | 25.4 | 84.8 | -2.12 | 40.5 | 34.0 |
| Deirdre Miller | - | 12 | 21.9 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 4.6 | 5.0 | -78 | -6.5 | -22.2 | 32.7 | 36.4 | 90.0 | -3.2 | 48.0 | 43.6 |
| Michaela Medico | - | 21 | 19.3 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 2.9 | -103 | -5.2 | -36.2 | 42.4 | 0.0 | 48.1 | -1.3 | 44.4 | 42.4 |
| McKenzie Winder | - | 19 | 12.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.1 | -6 | -0.3 | -4.3 | 28.6 | 18.2 | 70.0 | 1.68 | 39.3 | 34.3 |
| Sydney Logsdon | - | 17 | 12.6 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.3 | -0.3 | -47 | -2.9 | -188.9 | 16.1 | 12.8 | 50.0 | -1.29 | 22.0 | 21.4 |
| Rea Ukaj | - | 8 | 3.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | -13 | -2.2 | -56.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -0.71 | 34.0 | 20.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG