Evansville
2021 Team Stats (2 games)
50.0
PPG
58.0
Opp
-8.0
Margin
36.7%
FG%
30.4%
3P%
66.7%
FT%
31.0
RPG
10.0
APG
11.5
TO
65.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1050 (#242) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1045 (#299) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +16.1 (#304) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.154 (#86) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.024 (#105) | AdjNet -31.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.025 (#105) | AdjNet -31.9 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-27 | @ | Southern Illinois Salukis | L | 57 - 63 |
| 2021-03-05 | @ | Indiana State Sycamores | L | 43 - 53 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. Frederking
|
G | 2 | 34.5 | 11.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.5 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 36.8 | 44.4 | 100.0 | - | 53.0 | 47.4 |
J. Newton
|
- | 2 | 33.0 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 11.5 | 7.0 | -23 | -2.3 | -6.3 | 30.4 | 20.0 | 80.0 | -0.57 | 39.7 | 34.8 |
S. Givance
|
- | 2 | 30.5 | 9.5 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 10.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 38.1 | 40.0 | 16.7 | - | 40.2 | 42.9 |
S. Curtis
|
- | 1 | 16.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 25.0 | 100.0 | - | 50.9 | 41.7 |
E. Kuhlman
|
F | 2 | 34.5 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 8.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 31.2 | 23.1 | 0 | - | 40.6 | 40.6 |
Gage Bobe
|
- | 1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
I. Enaruna
|
F | 2 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 81.0 | 66.7 |
J. Levitch
|
F | 2 | 31.5 | 3.0 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 40.0 | 0.0 | - | 46.6 | 50.0 |
A. Matthews
|
G | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
T. Gilgeous-Alexander
|
G | 1 | 15.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
T. Hall
|
- | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG