Emory & Henry
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 908 (#445) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 873 (#459) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 831 (#664) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -6.2 (#227) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -11.8 (#535) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.178 (#496) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.188 (#368) | NetEff -11.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.266 (#482) | AdjNet -8.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.266 (#485) | AdjNet -8.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.366 (#490) | AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 73.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.248 (#643) | AdjO 62.8 | AdjD 74.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.199 (#596) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.198 (#607) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 781 (#485) | RD 100 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 | @ | Radford | L | 36 - 69 |
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Southern Wesleyan | W | 82 - 62 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Belmont Abbey | L | 52 - 70 |
| 2025-11-20 | @ | King (TN) | L | 70 - 76 |
| 2025-11-23 | @ | Trevecca Nazarene | L | 38 - 80 |
| 2025-11-29 | vs | Anderson (SC) | W | 84 - 73 |
| 2025-12-03 | vs | Mount Olive | W | 92 - 55 |
| 2025-12-06 | @ | Lenoir-Rhyne | L | 82 - 92 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Newberry | L | 66 - 79 |
| 2025-12-17 | @ | Lincoln Memorial | L | 61 - 85 |
| 2025-12-20 | @ | Catawba | L | 66 - 79 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Virginia St. | L | 53 - 74 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Coker | L | 56 - 64 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Mars Hill | W | 98 - 73 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Wingate | L | 69 - 76 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Tusculum | L | 62 - 63 |
| 2026-01-23 | @ | Anderson (SC) | L | 66 - 88 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | Lincoln Memorial | L | 64 - 82 |
| 2026-01-30 | vs | Lenoir-Rhyne | L | 70 - 120 |
| 2026-02-04 | @ | Mars Hill | W | 78 - 65 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Newberry | L | 64 - 69 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lyndie Ramsey | - | 11 | 27.0 | 14.5 | 6.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 12.5 | 7.7 | -39 | -3.5 | -25.2 | 40.9 | 35.2 | 69.7 | 1.87 | 52.8 | 50.0 |
| Breanna Yarber | - | 11 | 26.3 | 14.2 | 6.6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 10.6 | 12.7 | -12 | -1.1 | -9.3 | 51.3 | 41.7 | 79.5 | 1.57 | 58.1 | 53.4 |
| Hali Harris | - | 19 | 24.2 | 8.9 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 9.4 | 4.2 | -160 | -8.4 | -32.8 | 32.6 | 20.5 | 67.7 | 0.53 | 40.9 | 35.1 |
| Rhyan Harris | - | 21 | 24.5 | 8.8 | 4.4 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 6.9 | 7.9 | -101 | -4.4 | -20.3 | 49.0 | 38.3 | 75.8 | 0.51 | 58.0 | 55.2 |
| Tori West | - | 19 | 24.3 | 8.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 7.6 | 3.2 | -131 | -6.5 | -29.8 | 40.0 | 33.3 | 75.8 | -2.39 | 51.7 | 48.3 |
| Gracyn Hall | - | 19 | 23.1 | 8.1 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 7.1 | 7.2 | -49 | -2.5 | -13.4 | 38.8 | 33.3 | 85.7 | 3.04 | 52.3 | 48.1 |
| Paige Niethammer | - | 11 | 20.4 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 6.8 | 5.8 | -44 | -4.0 | -37.9 | 37.3 | 23.1 | 80.6 | -1.98 | 48.4 | 39.3 |
| Kinley Painter | - | 20 | 21.0 | 7.2 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 7.2 | 4.0 | -121 | -5.5 | -29.7 | 34.7 | 21.9 | 74.4 | 2.5 | 44.4 | 39.6 |
| Julie Matheson | - | 13 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 0.5 | -43 | -2.9 | -36.8 | 32.5 | 31.4 | 50.0 | -2.09 | 46.5 | 46.2 |
| Dot Mills | - | 19 | 23.8 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 4.6 | -52 | -2.6 | -16.3 | 32.8 | 28.1 | 58.3 | -1.97 | 42.2 | 40.2 |
| Camori Veal | - | 14 | 9.8 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.4 | -82 | -5.1 | -51.8 | 59.1 | 0 | 66.7 | -2.69 | 62.9 | 59.1 |
| Hannah Miller | - | 21 | 14.6 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 4.8 | -83 | -1.8 | -18.7 | 38.1 | 38.9 | 85.7 | -5.95 | 49.9 | 46.4 |
| Journi Grice | - | 7 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | -0.1 | -7 | -0.9 | -23.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | -0.14 | 39.4 | 31.2 |
| Reagan Chapman | - | 14 | 9.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 | -0.4 | -127 | -7.5 | -117.0 | 9.1 | 16.7 | 50.0 | -4.85 | 16.8 | 13.6 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG