Eastern N.M.
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1198 (#29) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1109 (#84) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 987 (#465) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +17.1 (#34) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +16.6 (#124) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.666 (#299) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.906 (#134) | NetEff +16.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.867 (#237) | AdjNet +16.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.881 (#224) | AdjNet +17.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.735 (#222) | AdjO 69.0 | AdjD 57.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.712 (#77) | AdjO 68.0 | AdjD 58.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.774 (#121) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.760 (#128) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1100 (#110) | RD 99 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Regis (CO) | W | 80 - 52 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Adams St. | L | 63 - 66 |
| 2025-11-18 | @ | Okla. Baptist | L | 85 - 93 |
| 2025-11-21 | @ | Fort Hays St. | L | 66 - 74 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Newman | W | 89 - 54 |
| 2025-12-01 | vs | Southwestern Okla. | W | 68 - 64 |
| 2025-12-04 | vs | Cameron | W | 76 - 36 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Okla. Christian | W | 63 - 50 |
| 2025-12-11 | @ | Texas-Dallas | W | 68 - 47 |
| 2025-12-19 | @ | Western Wash. | L | 40 - 44 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Simon Fraser | W | 74 - 71 |
| 2025-12-29 | @ | New Mexico St. | L | 48 - 52 |
| 2026-01-02 | @ | Sul Ross St. | W | 101 - 58 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | St. Edward's | W | 88 - 60 |
| 2026-01-15 | @ | Midwestern St. | W | 66 - 54 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Lubbock Christian | L | 63 - 77 |
| 2026-01-22 | vs | West Tex. A&M | L | 83 - 84 |
| 2026-01-29 | vs | Texas Woman's | L | 63 - 66 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | UT Tyler | L | 47 - 61 |
| 2026-02-05 | @ | Okla. Christian | L | 55 - 66 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Cameron | W | 76 - 47 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Dallas | - | 13 | 20.5 | 13.9 | 7.7 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 9.5 | 12.2 | 25 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 57.3 | 0.0 | 58.2 | 4.51 | 59.0 | 57.3 |
| Aaliyah Smith | - | 20 | 18.6 | 10.3 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 9.8 | 4.5 | 32 | 1.5 | 9.8 | 37.2 | 27.0 | 57.1 | -3.43 | 46.0 | 43.4 |
| Julieta Ceja | - | 21 | 27.1 | 10.0 | 6.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 56 | 2.3 | 9.3 | 48.5 | 40.9 | 65.9 | -1.22 | 56.1 | 53.9 |
| Ashala Moseberry | - | 20 | 22.2 | 8.4 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 7.1 | 6.5 | 73 | 3.5 | 19.7 | 37.3 | 38.6 | 88.5 | 0.76 | 54.7 | 51.1 |
| Nataya Lockett | - | 20 | 18.9 | 7.7 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 7.5 | 4.3 | 64 | 2.7 | 19.9 | 35.8 | 21.7 | 73.2 | -2.26 | 43.8 | 37.4 |
| Tatiana Platonova | - | 16 | 21.0 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 6.1 | 5.3 | 128 | 7.1 | 113.4 | 36.7 | 26.5 | 57.1 | 2.03 | 44.5 | 41.3 |
| Mekhila Brown | - | 12 | 12.5 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 3 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 37.0 | 0.0 | 63.0 | 1.12 | 43.3 | 37.0 |
| Toyah Montgomery | - | 12 | 16.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 51 | 4.2 | 27.0 | 37.7 | 26.9 | 45.5 | -0.19 | 45.0 | 44.3 |
| Martrice Brooks | - | 18 | 18.4 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 36.6 | 25.0 | 63.6 | 0.7 | 45.0 | 39.4 |
| Jaz Salon | - | 19 | 16.6 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 39 | 1.9 | 11.2 | 39.1 | 28.6 | 46.2 | 2.91 | 46.8 | 46.4 |
| Hannah Jensen | - | 19 | 11.3 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 38 | 2.0 | 18.9 | 32.7 | 37.9 | 62.5 | 2.34 | 46.6 | 43.3 |
| Daci Smith | - | 19 | 7.3 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 20 | 0.9 | 14.8 | 32.7 | 35.0 | 100.0 | 1.56 | 48.1 | 46.9 |
| Victoria Barrera | - | 17 | 18.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 126 | 6.3 | 43.7 | 26.8 | 20.0 | 25.0 | -0.53 | 32.8 | 33.0 |
| Tonka Jaksic | - | 18 | 7.0 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 85 | 4.2 | 117.7 | 42.4 | 21.4 | 77.8 | 3.16 | 51.4 | 47.0 |
| Niyah Johnson | - | 8 | 12.4 | 0.9 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 4.2 | 32 | 4.0 | 22.1 | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -1.23 | 31.4 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG