East Stroudsburg
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1015 (#148) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 982 (#185) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +3.7 (#162) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.383 (#410) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.805 (#118) | NetEff +10.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.336 (#457) | AdjNet -5.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.341 (#457) | AdjNet -5.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.438 (#452) | AdjO 59.1 | AdjD 61.8 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Virginia Union | W | 57 - 54 |
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Point Park | W | 87 - 48 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | Jefferson | L | 58 - 69 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Gannon | L | 47 - 60 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Lincoln (PA) | W | 74 - 62 |
| 2024-12-01 | @ | Staten Island | L | 55 - 61 |
| 2024-12-06 | vs | Edinboro | L | 0 - 0 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | California (PA) | L | 63 - 69 |
| 2024-12-08 | vs | Edinboro | L | 44 - 73 |
| 2024-12-18 | @ | Seton Hill | L | 69 - 79 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Slippery Rock | W | 60 - 45 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | Mercy | L | 62 - 68 |
| 2025-01-06 | vs | Shepherd | W | 68 - 65 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | West Chester | L | 72 - 77 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Lock Haven | W | 64 - 54 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Shippensburg | L | 69 - 70 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Bloomsburg | L | 61 - 74 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Millersville | W | 69 - 62 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Mansfield | W | 70 - 50 |
| 2025-01-29 | @ | Kutztown | L | 58 - 62 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Shepherd | W | 58 - 47 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Millersville | W | 69 - 63 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Bloomsburg | L | 54 - 63 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Shippensburg | W | 54 - 49 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | West Chester | L | 62 - 64 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Mansfield | W | 76 - 55 |
| 2025-02-26 | vs | Kutztown | W | 77 - 64 |
| 2025-03-01 | vs | Lock Haven | L | 57 - 61 |
| 2025-03-03 | @ | Bloomsburg | L | 57 - 60 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Chmiel | - | 28 | 31.1 | 22.3 | 12.3 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 16.3 | 18.2 | -51 | -1.8 | -2.0 | 52.0 | 0 | 77.4 | -0.39 | 57.7 | 52.0 |
| Brie Droege | - | 28 | 27.6 | 11.1 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 8.6 | 7.2 | 4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 47.1 | 40.0 | 84.6 | 0.48 | 56.1 | 50.4 |
| Brooke Droege | - | 28 | 20.0 | 6.0 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 6.5 | 2.4 | -34 | -0.9 | -1.2 | 41.0 | 41.2 | 68.8 | 0.07 | 44.2 | 42.9 |
| Lacie Kringe | - | 27 | 23.3 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 5.9 | 3.6 | -61 | -1.6 | -2.0 | 33.3 | 21.1 | 57.1 | -0.89 | 40.0 | 37.1 |
| Jessica Polin | - | 28 | 23.2 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 6.1 | 3.8 | -17 | -0.6 | -0.9 | 26.2 | 26.1 | 73.1 | -0.0 | 39.5 | 36.6 |
| Corrin Gill | - | 28 | 25.8 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 3.8 | -19 | -0.7 | -0.9 | 33.9 | 29.3 | 61.3 | 0.21 | 41.8 | 38.7 |
| Izzy Vogel | - | 28 | 18.2 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 3.9 | -13 | -0.5 | -0.7 | 30.8 | 9.1 | 68.0 | 0.12 | 34.7 | 31.2 |
| Katie Geisler | - | 28 | 16.5 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 2.9 | -19 | -0.7 | -1.2 | 37.5 | 0 | 53.3 | 0.33 | 39.3 | 37.5 |
| Cassidy Saylor | - | 27 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 0.3 | -5 | -0.3 | -1.3 | 37.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.11 | 41.3 | 37.8 |
| Madi Siggins | - | 20 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 | -28 | -2.8 | -5.7 | 35.7 | 0 | 78.6 | -0.23 | 52.1 | 35.7 |
| Kaitlyn McGeary | - | 26 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 45.5 | 0 | 57.1 | 0.0 | 47.8 | 45.5 |
| Caitlin Marten | - | 26 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 14 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 38.5 | 0 | 25.0 | 0.46 | 37.3 | 38.5 |
| Adrine Demirciyan | - | 26 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 41.0 | 25.0 |
| Lily Sugra | - | 26 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 44.4 | 40.0 |
| Lillie Pon | - | 26 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG