Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 989 (#257) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 990 (#252) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -2.1 (#204) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.404 (#489) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.412 (#269) | NetEff -2.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.319 (#439) | AdjNet -6.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.299 (#445) | AdjNet -7.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.408 (#429) | AdjO 57.6 | AdjD 61.7 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | vs | Saint Elizabeth | W | 62 - 55 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | Montclair St. | L | 49 - 68 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | Moravian | W | 70 - 55 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Goucher | W | 88 - 78 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Scranton | L | 49 - 74 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Lycoming | W | 67 - 63 |
| 2024-12-14 | vs | FDU-Florham | W | 85 - 56 |
| 2024-12-18 | vs | Salisbury | W | 67 - 60 |
| 2024-12-31 | vs | Franklin & Marshall | L | 46 - 67 |
| 2025-01-06 | vs | Rutgers-Camden | W | 78 - 59 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Susquehanna | L | 64 - 75 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Catholic | L | 49 - 78 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Wilkes | W | 62 - 47 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Juniata | W | 55 - 54 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Elizabethtown | L | 51 - 66 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Goucher | L | 56 - 58 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | Scranton | L | 39 - 78 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Lycoming | W | 69 - 48 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Moravian | W | 62 - 58 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Juniata | W | 62 - 58 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Wilkes | W | 68 - 51 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Catholic | L | 62 - 78 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Elizabethtown | L | 57 - 77 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Susquehanna | L | 52 - 55 |
| 2025-02-25 | @ | Susquehanna | W | 76 - 68 |
| 2025-02-27 | @ | Scranton | L | 36 - 68 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianna Pica | - | 26 | 28.1 | 14.4 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 14.8 | 5.8 | 53 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 36.8 | 30.6 | 58.9 | -0.05 | 44.1 | 41.7 |
| Amy Rachilla | - | 26 | 31.7 | 10.8 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 8.4 | 9.1 | 44 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 37.9 | 45.6 | 76.9 | -0.19 | 52.1 | 43.8 |
| Maddie Beyer | - | 26 | 24.9 | 7.5 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 6.7 | 4.9 | 64 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 33.1 | 37.1 | 81.1 | 0.71 | 49.2 | 43.4 |
| Alice Altomare | - | 26 | 14.6 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 10 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 34.3 | 33.8 | 75.0 | 0.26 | 50.1 | 48.2 |
| Miabella Diaz | - | 26 | 23.4 | 5.8 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.6 | 6.2 | 41 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 34.9 | 26.5 | 70.0 | -0.15 | 44.6 | 39.4 |
| Brenna Hezel | - | 26 | 26.7 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 7 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 37.8 | 0.0 | 71.8 | 0.24 | 43.0 | 37.8 |
| Olivia Aliotta | - | 22 | 14.0 | 4.2 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 39 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 33.3 | 22.9 | 53.6 | -0.28 | 39.6 | 37.1 |
| Gracie Hezel | - | 26 | 10.8 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 34 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 38.6 | 0.0 | 69.2 | 0.23 | 41.1 | 38.6 |
| Jocelyn Kingsley | - | 26 | 15.0 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 10 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 38.9 | 13.3 | 58.8 | 0.56 | 42.8 | 40.3 |
| Isabelle Lalo | - | 24 | 5.9 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 25 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 25.5 | 18.2 | 66.7 | 0.2 | 33.4 | 29.8 |
| Izzy Lalo | - | 2 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 25 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.2 | 34.7 | 0.0 |
| Mia Hartman | - | 22 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | -9 | -0.3 | -0.8 | 28.6 | 25.0 | 100.0 | -0.2 | 40.3 | 35.7 |
| Darcy Debenedittis | - | 25 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 7 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.14 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Camille Schiralli | - | 24 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Emily Bass | - | 25 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | -0.2 | -4 | -0.2 | -1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.17 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Harrison Anderson | - | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG