Dist. Columbia
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 964 (#253) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 942 (#243) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -6.8 (#266) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.392 (#404) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.338 (#259) | NetEff -4.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.244 (#496) | AdjNet -9.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.246 (#498) | AdjNet -9.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.388 (#473) | AdjO 63.8 | AdjD 68.8 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Holy Family | L | 51 - 71 |
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Franklin Pierce | L | 58 - 72 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | Bloomfield | W | 71 - 61 |
| 2024-11-24 | @ | Virginia St. | L | 71 - 85 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Chestnut Hill | L | 65 - 83 |
| 2024-11-30 | @ | Virginia Union | L | 64 - 90 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Bowie St. | L | 46 - 70 |
| 2024-12-06 | vs | D'Youville | W | 66 - 65 |
| 2024-12-08 | vs | Daemen | L | 64 - 79 |
| 2024-12-14 | vs | Staten Island | L | 54 - 62 |
| 2024-12-16 | vs | Frostburg St. | L | 64 - 72 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Adelphi | W | 61 - 58 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | St. Thomas Aquinas | W | 78 - 65 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Mercy | L | 66 - 80 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Roberts Wesleyan | W | 76 - 51 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Queens (NY) | W | 55 - 52 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Molloy | W | 82 - 47 |
| 2025-01-31 | @ | D'Youville | L | 40 - 61 |
| 2025-02-02 | @ | Daemen | L | 56 - 59 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Staten Island | L | 67 - 76 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | St. Thomas Aquinas | W | 86 - 64 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Mercy | L | 59 - 65 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Roberts Wesleyan | W | 66 - 50 |
| 2025-02-24 | @ | Jefferson | L | 57 - 69 |
| 2025-02-26 | vs | Queens (NY) | W | 57 - 54 |
| 2025-03-01 | @ | Molloy | L | 57 - 66 |
| 2025-03-05 | @ | Mercy | L | 49 - 73 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laci Johnson | - | 25 | 30.0 | 14.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 14.3 | 3.6 | 7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 35.9 | 30.7 | 73.6 | 0.07 | 47.2 | 44.0 |
| Tori Williams | - | 27 | 26.1 | 10.2 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 35 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 32.7 | 18.9 | 56.8 | 0.5 | 38.0 | 34.9 |
| Kensley Benjamin | - | 27 | 24.5 | 9.1 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 8.4 | 5.4 | 27 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 37.0 | 26.4 | 74.7 | 0.44 | 47.5 | 42.1 |
| Nia Ford | - | 26 | 26.4 | 7.1 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 8.9 | 3.7 | -2 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 30.7 | 21.7 | 65.7 | -0.13 | 37.5 | 35.1 |
| Tania Hill | - | 27 | 21.0 | 6.3 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 6.4 | 7.1 | 37 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 38.4 | 20.8 | 78.4 | 0.4 | 45.4 | 41.3 |
| Kristian Harris | - | 26 | 21.5 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 6.8 | 4.5 | -112 | -3.3 | -4.6 | 32.8 | 21.4 | 71.0 | -0.74 | 37.8 | 34.5 |
| Brenda McKinney | - | 6 | 17.8 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 7.5 | -8 | -0.4 | -0.8 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 60.0 | 0.18 | 55.9 | 52.3 |
| Nhaikyia Smith | - | 25 | 21.8 | 4.8 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 5.5 | 4.4 | -82 | -2.5 | -3.3 | 29.7 | 26.8 | 71.8 | -0.81 | 39.0 | 33.7 |
| Jada Bouknight | - | 27 | 20.7 | 3.4 | 6.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 8.9 | 25 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 50.0 | 0 | 44.8 | 0.41 | 50.1 | 50.0 |
| Zoe Collins | - | 9 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 22.5 | 25.0 |
| Charme Lilly | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Aliyah Eason | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -9 | -1.3 | -2.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Aiyana Ellis | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -90 | -7.5 | -9.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.34 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG