Delaware State
2026-2027 Team Stats (5 games)
60.6
PPG
84.0
Opp
-23.4
Margin
40.1%
FG%
28.7%
3P%
63.0%
FT%
33.2
RPG
9.6
APG
23.2
TO
74.7
Est. poss./game
57.6
Adj PPG
73.3
Adj Opp PPG
#349
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2026-2027
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 669 (#346) | Preseason prior 645 (returning production + recruiting): last season 792, returning -84, transfers -63, freshmen +0 |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 787 (#342) | HCA +169 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 791 (#341) | HCA +169 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -20.3 (#339) | HCA +1.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -20.3 (#339) | HCA +1.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.019 (#346) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.105 (#347) | AdjNet -21.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.110 (#345) | AdjNet -19.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.167 (#349) | AdjO 57.6 | AdjD 73.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.169 (#349) | AdjO 57.7 | AdjD 73.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.157 (#337) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.157 (#337) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 759 (#343) | RD 170 | GP 4 |
| Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. More → | 0.116 (#343) | Chronological component blend with rest and venue. |
Rank through the season
League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.
Recency Ensemble
Log Adjusted
Elo
Points Off/Def Recency
2026-2027 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | @ | Georgetown Hoyas | L | 47 - 84 |
| 2026-11-04 | vs | Georgian Court Lions | W | 80 - 75 |
| 2026-11-08 | @ | Robert Morris Colonials | L | 53 - 69 |
| 2026-11-10 | @ | Pittsburgh Panthers | L | 51 - 129 |
| 2026-11-13 | vs | American University Eagles | W | 72 - 63 |
| 2026-11-18 | @ | NJIT Highlanders | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-21 | @ | Rutgers Scarlet Knights | - | Preview |
2026-2027 Roster
Estimated Minutes by Position
Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amya Scott
|
G | 3 | 16.3 | 12.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.3 | 5.3 | -6 | 3 | -2.0 | -5.0 | 63.6 | 50.0 | 63.6 | 0.59 | 67.1 | 65.9 |
Anise Geiger
|
F | 5 | 22.8 | 11.2 | 6.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 7.8 | 12.4 | -37 | 5 | -7.4 | -13.4 | 64.1 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.72 | 63.2 | 64.1 |
Skylah Kemp
|
G | 5 | 26.6 | 10.2 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 7.4 | 6.4 | -77 | 5 | -15.4 | -22.8 | 43.2 | 31.6 | 86.7 | -0.53 | 58.5 | 51.4 |
Skye Pepp
|
G | 5 | 34.2 | 10.2 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 8.4 | 6.8 | -95 | 5 | -19.0 | -22.8 | 40.5 | 66.7 | 72.2 | -2.64 | 51.1 | 45.2 |
Maya McCorkle
|
G | 5 | 25.6 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 4.8 | 2.4 | -57 | 5 | -11.4 | -18.4 | 37.5 | 30.0 | 71.4 | -3.22 | 51.4 | 43.8 |
Channing Williams
|
G | 5 | 16.8 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 4.8 | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | 29.2 | 23.1 | 66.7 | - | 39.4 | 35.4 |
Mahogany Cottingham
|
G | 5 | 18.2 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 4.2 | 0.0 | -69 | 5 | -13.8 | -30.9 | 23.8 | 23.1 | 62.5 | -2.89 | 36.7 | 31.0 |
Dallas Pierce
|
G | 5 | 8.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 1.2 | -46 | 5 | -9.2 | -43.2 | 25.0 | 30.0 | 71.4 | -8.0 | 41.9 | 34.4 |
Jaida Helm
|
G | 5 | 16.8 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 1.8 | -21 | 5 | -4.2 | -10.2 | 29.4 | 22.2 | 42.9 | 1.56 | 37.4 | 35.3 |
Autumn Simon
|
C | 5 | 16.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 0.2 | -80 | 5 | -16.0 | -39.7 | 15.4 | 0.0 | 25.0 | -4.48 | 18.2 | 15.4 |
Oluwalu Enajekpo
|
C | 2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | -1 | 2 | -0.5 | -9.6 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.42 | 53.2 | 100.0 |
Jadea' Johnson
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Eniyah Stinnette
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Mariah Jones
|
G | 3 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 2.0 | -3.3 | -39 | 3 | -13.0 | -87.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -3.56 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2026-2027 Shot Zones
262 located field-goal attempts in 5 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Anise GeigerSkye PeppSkylah KempAmya ScottChanning WilliamsMahogany CottinghamJaida HelmDallas Pierce
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 50-90 | 55.6 | 100 | Anise Geiger 40% (40 pts) | Skye Pepp 22% (22 pts) | Anise Geiger 22% (9 misses) | Skye Pepp 15% (6 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 23-60 | 38.3 | 46 | Amya Scott 35% (16 pts) | Anise Geiger 22% (10 pts) | Skye Pepp 19% (7 misses) | Anise Geiger 14% (5 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 2-9 | 22.2 | 4 | Mahogany Cottingham 50% (2 pts) | Maya McCorkle 50% (2 pts) | Skye Pepp 57% (4 misses) | Amya Scott 14% (1 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 2-8 | 25.0 | 4 | Channing Williams 50% (2 pts) | Jaida Helm 50% (2 pts) | Skye Pepp 50% (3 misses) | Channing Williams 33% (2 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 3-7 | 42.9 | 6 | Amya Scott 33% (2 pts) | Skye Pepp 33% (2 pts) | Skye Pepp 50% (2 misses) | Jaida Helm 25% (1 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 3-16 | 18.8 | 9 | Channing Williams 33% (3 pts) | Skye Pepp 33% (3 pts) | Channing Williams 31% (4 misses) | Skylah Kemp 31% (4 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 3-13 | 23.1 | 9 | Jaida Helm 33% (3 pts) | Mahogany Cottingham 33% (3 pts) | Mahogany Cottingham 30% (3 misses) | Skylah Kemp 30% (3 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 11-28 | 39.3 | 33 | Channing Williams 18% (6 pts) | Dallas Pierce 18% (6 pts) | Mahogany Cottingham 24% (4 misses) | Jaida Helm 18% (3 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 2-15 | 13.3 | 6 | Dallas Pierce 50% (3 pts) | Maya McCorkle 50% (3 pts) | Dallas Pierce 38% (5 misses) | Maya McCorkle 23% (3 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 6-16 | 37.5 | 18 | Skylah Kemp 33% (6 pts) | Amya Scott 17% (3 pts) | Skylah Kemp 40% (4 misses) | Channing Williams 20% (2 misses) |