DePauw
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1035 (#156) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1090 (#115) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +22.0 (#19) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.911 (#236) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.955 (#42) | NetEff +24.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.977 (#144) | AdjNet +32.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.979 (#145) | AdjNet +32.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.848 (#149) | AdjO 71.1 | AdjD 52.1 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Wis.-Whitewater | L | 58 - 64 |
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Wis.-Stevens Point | W | 69 - 47 |
| 2024-11-17 | @ | Transylvania | L | 40 - 59 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Albion | W | 60 - 50 |
| 2024-11-30 | @ | Ill. Wesleyan | L | 59 - 65 |
| 2024-12-01 | @ | Rose-Hulman | W | 90 - 37 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Denison | W | 75 - 65 |
| 2024-12-20 | @ | Lawrence | L | 57 - 58 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | LeTourneau | W | 74 - 49 |
| 2024-12-29 | vs | Adrian | W | 87 - 57 |
| 2024-12-30 | vs | MSOE | W | 69 - 47 |
| 2025-01-04 | @ | Hiram | W | 81 - 42 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Oberlin | W | 67 - 57 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Wittenberg | W | 79 - 70 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Kenyon | W | 76 - 38 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 56 - 68 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Wooster | W | 92 - 39 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Hiram | W | 72 - 52 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Denison | W | 62 - 52 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Oberlin | W | 70 - 42 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Wittenberg | W | 65 - 55 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Kenyon | W | 86 - 29 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 57 - 71 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Wooster | W | 73 - 39 |
| 2025-02-28 | vs | Hiram | W | 69 - 53 |
| 2025-03-01 | vs | Wittenberg | W | 46 - 44 |
| 2025-03-07 | @ | Bethel (MN) | L | 65 - 71 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ava Hassel | - | 27 | 25.3 | 12.9 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 10.9 | 9.0 | 76 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 38.9 | 34.3 | 77.7 | 0.5 | 51.9 | 46.8 |
| Riley Mont | - | 27 | 25.1 | 10.0 | 5.7 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 9.9 | 7.4 | 65 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 36.7 | 33.7 | 69.0 | 0.61 | 46.2 | 43.1 |
| Olivia Hart | - | 27 | 24.9 | 9.9 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 9.1 | 8.7 | 31 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 45.1 | 0.0 | 70.3 | 0.28 | 48.7 | 45.1 |
| Moira Mcginley | - | 5 | 23.4 | 8.8 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 7.8 | 4.4 | 41 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 41.0 | 28.6 | 85.7 | 0.1 | 52.3 | 48.7 |
| Diana Burgher | - | 9 | 16.9 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 7.3 | 5.7 | 21 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 42.4 | 36.4 | 85.7 | 0.73 | 47.8 | 45.5 |
| Ainsley Boras | - | 27 | 25.3 | 6.8 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 60 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 41.4 | 19.0 | 65.2 | 0.3 | 45.7 | 42.5 |
| Lily Huntzinger | - | 27 | 15.3 | 5.9 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 36 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 44.1 | 38.3 | 79.3 | 0.52 | 56.5 | 53.1 |
| Tori Allen | - | 27 | 13.7 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.6 | -1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 45.1 | 43.5 | 78.4 | 0.7 | 62.6 | 57.3 |
| Alina Prusko | - | 27 | 11.3 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 32.8 | 25.0 | 73.3 | -0.09 | 42.9 | 38.5 |
| Campbell Schrank | - | 24 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 | -16 | -0.7 | -1.4 | 47.8 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 0.04 | 61.3 | 54.3 |
| Hannah Lach | - | 23 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 6 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 35.1 | 30.8 | 50.0 | 0.09 | 46.2 | 45.9 |
| Asya Smith | - | 21 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.4 | -11 | -1.1 | -7.1 | 44.4 | 0.0 | 66.7 | -0.14 | 50.1 | 44.4 |
| Hannah Meyers | - | 22 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | -29 | -1.9 | -11.3 | 63.6 | 60.0 | 75.0 | -0.52 | 78.4 | 77.3 |
| Lauren Dady | - | 23 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | -33 | -1.4 | -7.9 | 50.0 | 0 | 75.0 | -0.71 | 54.5 | 50.0 |
| Lyla Barr | - | 25 | 11.8 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 36.8 | 0 | 66.7 | -0.02 | 39.4 | 36.8 |
| Caroline Condra | - | 24 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | -3 | -0.2 | -1.3 | 38.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -0.1 | 43.2 | 38.5 |
| Kayla Petersen | - | 7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Noinah Sunchatavirul | - | 19 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Christina Burghardt | - | 14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Chloe Gonzalez | - | 22 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG