๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Dallas Wings

Also known as: Dallas Wings
Program History

2000 Team Stats (1 games)

69.0
PPG
83.0
Opp
-14.0
Margin
46.3%
FG%
44.4%
3P%
60.0%
FT%
27.0
RPG
17.0
APG
20.0
TO
80.2
Est. poss./game
71.4
Adj PPG
75.0
Adj Opp PPG
#13
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2000
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 912 (#12) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 931 (#10) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +110 elo More โ†’ 945 (#11) HCA +110 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.7 More โ†’ -3.8 (#13) HCA +3.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +4.5 More โ†’ -4.2 (#12) HCA +4.5
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.387 (#12) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -5.0 More โ†’ 0.361 (#12) AdjNet -5.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -5.0 More โ†’ 0.360 (#12) AdjNet -5.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 71.4 | AdjD 75.0 More โ†’ 0.418 (#13) AdjO 71.4 | AdjD 75.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 69.9 | AdjD 73.7 More โ†’ 0.414 (#12) AdjO 69.9 | AdjD 73.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.388 (#11) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.387 (#11) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 101 | GP 32 More โ†’ 919 (#11) RD 101 | GP 32

2000 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2000-06-03 vs Sacramento Monarchs - Incomplete score
2000-06-05 @ Minnesota Lynx - Incomplete score
2000-06-07 vs New York Liberty - Incomplete score
2000-06-09 vs Indiana Fever - Incomplete score
2000-06-12 vs Charlotte - Incomplete score
2000-06-13 @ Miami Sol - Incomplete score
2000-06-16 @ Cleveland Rockers - Incomplete score
2000-06-18 vs Indiana Fever - Incomplete score
2000-06-19 @ Washington Mystics - Incomplete score
2000-06-21 @ New York Liberty - Incomplete score
2000-06-24 vs Washington Mystics - Incomplete score
2000-06-25 @ Charlotte - Incomplete score
2000-06-28 @ Seattle Storm - Incomplete score
2000-07-01 @ Sacramento Monarchs - Incomplete score
2000-07-02 @ Los Angeles Sparks - Incomplete score
2000-07-06 @ Phoenix Mercury L 69 - 83
2000-07-07 @ Las Vegas Aces - Incomplete score
2000-07-09 vs Connecticut Sun - Incomplete score
2000-07-12 vs Seattle Storm - Incomplete score
2000-07-14 vs Miami Sol - Incomplete score
2000-07-19 @ Connecticut Sun - Incomplete score
2000-07-21 vs Houston Comets - Incomplete score
2000-07-24 vs Portland Fire - Incomplete score
2000-07-26 vs Miami Sol - Incomplete score
2000-07-28 @ Cleveland Rockers - Incomplete score
2000-07-29 vs Charlotte - Incomplete score
2000-07-31 vs Cleveland Rockers - Incomplete score
2000-08-02 vs Los Angeles Sparks - Incomplete score
2000-08-04 @ Washington Mystics - Incomplete score
2000-08-06 @ Connecticut Sun - Incomplete score
2000-08-07 @ Indiana Fever - Incomplete score
2000-08-09 vs New York Liberty - Incomplete score

2000 Roster

Counting stats use played regular-season games. PM and RAPM use their separate model samples; PM GP shows that sample's game count.

Minutes by Position

Each player's share of the team's minutes per game (season minutes over the roster's), placed by position, so every column is one game's minutes. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Claudia Neves - 1 24.0 12.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 6.0 123 30 4.1 9.2 55.6 50.0 0 0.66 66.7 66.7
Wendy Palmer - 1 24.0 10.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 13.0 2.0 130 32 4.1 7.2 38.5 0 0 0.53 38.5 38.5
Joy Holmes - 1 25.0 9.0 7.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 8.0 10.0 -23 29 -0.8 -2.8 50.0 0.0 50.0 -0.35 50.7 50.0
Elena Tornikidou - 1 29.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 11.0 2.0 103 32 3.2 6.4 36.4 0 100.0 0.54 39.3 36.4
Anna DeForge - 1 21.0 9.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 6.0 5.0 70 27 2.6 5.7 50.0 50.0 50.0 1.13 65.4 66.7
Edwina Brown - 1 30.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 9.0 4.0 44 32 1.4 2.8 44.4 0 0 0.16 44.4 44.4
Astou Ndiaye-Diatta - 1 20.0 6.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 91 32 2.8 5.7 50.0 0 0 0.38 50.0 50.0
Oksana Zakaluzhnaya - 1 12.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 49 23 2.1 5.9 100.0 0 0 0.37 100.0 100.0
Olympia Scott - 1 15.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 -1.0 92 28 3.3 8.4 33.3 0 0 0.93 33.3 33.3

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG