Curry
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 840 (#460) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 755 (#466) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -13.8 (#307) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.172 (#601) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.190 (#327) | NetEff -10.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.066 (#575) | AdjNet -22.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.061 (#574) | AdjNet -23.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.209 (#571) | AdjO 55.1 | AdjD 69.7 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | @ | Wheaton (MA) | L | 57 - 62 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | UMass Boston | W | 69 - 60 |
| 2024-11-19 | vs | Dean | W | 91 - 51 |
| 2024-11-21 | @ | Bowdoin | L | 37 - 73 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | WPI | L | 39 - 57 |
| 2024-12-02 | vs | New England Col. | W | 64 - 59 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | Endicott | L | 58 - 74 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Suffolk | L | 46 - 83 |
| 2024-12-10 | @ | Roger Williams | L | 52 - 60 |
| 2024-12-31 | @ | JWU (Providence) | L | 50 - 67 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Nichols | L | 66 - 71 |
| 2025-01-07 | @ | Wentworth | W | 63 - 47 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Hartford | W | 78 - 57 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | U New England | L | 62 - 77 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Western New Eng. | L | 66 - 71 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Gordon | L | 53 - 55 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Suffolk | W | 68 - 65 |
| 2025-01-28 | @ | Endicott | L | 42 - 64 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Nichols | L | 72 - 83 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Wentworth | W | 72 - 60 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Roger Williams | L | 47 - 85 |
| 2025-02-11 | @ | Gordon | L | 57 - 70 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Western New Eng. | L | 42 - 72 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | U New England | L | 46 - 63 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Hartford | W | 51 - 48 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Dunn | - | 25 | 32.1 | 12.8 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 4.6 | 10.6 | 4.9 | -73 | -2.1 | -2.3 | 37.1 | 33.1 | 83.3 | -0.08 | 51.8 | 44.5 |
| Lauren Morse | - | 25 | 23.0 | 9.3 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 7.3 | 3.8 | -126 | -3.9 | -5.2 | 42.1 | 40.1 | 70.6 | -0.79 | 58.9 | 57.1 |
| Sophie Hilbrunner | - | 22 | 22.6 | 8.8 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 7.7 | 7.5 | -57 | -2.0 | -2.4 | 42.9 | 30.8 | 62.3 | -0.34 | 48.2 | 44.1 |
| Kasey Reeves | - | 21 | 25.1 | 7.7 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 8.0 | 5.6 | -95 | -3.4 | -4.2 | 35.7 | 15.0 | 73.1 | -0.55 | 42.2 | 36.6 |
| Kylie Mccarthy | - | 6 | 26.2 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 8.5 | 1.5 | -81 | -3.4 | -3.6 | 29.4 | 10.0 | 80.0 | -0.3 | 38.2 | 31.4 |
| Grace Fleuriel | - | 23 | 11.7 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 3.0 | -79 | -2.9 | -7.6 | 41.9 | 0 | 69.7 | -0.46 | 47.3 | 41.9 |
| Samantha Conti | - | 24 | 20.4 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 4.4 | -24 | -0.7 | -1.1 | 30.4 | 20.0 | 65.4 | -0.05 | 39.3 | 34.2 |
| Emerson Cherry | - | 25 | 20.0 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 4.4 | -25 | -1.0 | -1.7 | 31.1 | 27.5 | 70.0 | 0.0 | 42.9 | 38.5 |
| Brooke Kershow | - | 17 | 14.8 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 1.8 | -5 | -0.4 | -0.6 | 29.1 | 21.7 | 88.9 | 0.26 | 38.2 | 33.6 |
| Libby Harris | - | 25 | 7.8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | -0.5 | -68 | -2.1 | -7.5 | 19.5 | 16.7 | 0 | -0.82 | 26.8 | 26.8 |
| Lauren Reen | - | 15 | 5.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 | -4 | -0.2 | -1.1 | 15.4 | 10.0 | 0 | -0.08 | 19.2 | 19.2 |
| Jessica Helou-topini | - | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Emma Burke | - | 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -29 | -0.9 | -1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.35 | 0 | 0 |
| Ellery Campbell | - | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG