Creighton Bluejays
2023 Team Stats (20 games)
69.6
PPG
64.8
Opp
+5.2
Margin
42.4%
FG%
34.1%
3P%
77.5%
FT%
35.5
RPG
15.7
APG
11.2
TO
77.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1047 (#176) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1187 (#90) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +35.9 (#48) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.608 (#148) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-07 | @ | South Dakota State Jackrabbits | W | 78 - 69 |
| 2022-11-10 | @ | South Dakota Coyotes | W | 74 - 51 |
| 2022-11-15 | vs | Nebraska Cornhuskers | W | 77 - 51 |
| 2022-11-20 | @ | Northern Iowa Panthers | W | 85 - 66 |
| 2022-11-22 | @ | Omaha Mavericks | W | 93 - 71 |
| 2022-11-25 | @ | Xavier Musketeers | W | 57 - 51 |
| 2022-12-02 | @ | Villanova Wildcats | W | 67 - 46 |
| 2022-12-04 | @ | St. John's Red Storm | L | 62 - 66 |
| 2022-12-10 | vs | Drake Bulldogs | W | 75 - 71 |
| 2022-12-17 | vs | Arkansas Razorbacks | L | 75 - 83 |
| 2022-12-20 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | L | 59 - 72 |
| 2022-12-28 | vs | UConn Huskies | L | 47 - 72 |
| 2022-12-31 | @ | DePaul Blue Demons | W | 92 - 82 |
| 2023-01-04 | vs | Providence Friars | L | 75 - 79 |
| 2023-01-08 | vs | Marquette Golden Eagles | W | 68 - 42 |
| 2023-01-20 | vs | Villanova Wildcats | L | 57 - 73 |
| 2023-01-24 | @ | Providence Friars | W | 64 - 46 |
| 2023-02-07 | @ | Seton Hall Pirates | W | 77 - 64 |
| 2023-02-15 | @ | UConn Huskies | L | 60 - 62 |
| 2023-03-05 | @ | Villanova Wildcats | L | 61 - 63 |
| 2023-03-17 | vs | Mississippi State Bulldogs | L | 66 - 81 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Jensen
|
G | 20 | 34.3 | 15.8 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 14.4 | 7.3 | - | - | - | 42.2 | 28.8 | 79.5 | - | 51.4 | 48.8 |
M. Maly
|
G | 20 | 28.2 | 14.5 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 12.6 | 9.1 | - | - | - | 41.4 | 33.6 | 86.4 | - | 53.6 | 50.2 |
E. Ronsiek
|
F | 20 | 29.4 | 13.2 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 11.1 | 8.4 | - | - | - | 43.2 | 40.5 | 85.4 | - | 54.5 | 50.5 |
M. Mogensen
|
G | 20 | 30.3 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 7.0 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 38.3 | 35.9 | 69.6 | - | 48.6 | 46.5 |
R. Saunders
|
G | 14 | 25.4 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 3.9 | 9.4 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 52.2 | 82.8 | - | 70.8 | 65.5 |
C. Bachelor
|
G | 20 | 23.1 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 48.6 | 27.8 | 60.0 | - | 52.2 | 50.9 |
J. Horan
|
G | 20 | 10.8 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 2.7 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 33.3 | 66.7 | - | 52.7 | 52.1 |
M. Brake
|
F | 20 | 10.9 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 20.0 | 59.1 | - | 46.0 | 40.3 |
K. Townsend
|
G | 19 | 8.4 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 31.8 | 62.5 | - | 51.9 | 50.0 |
K. Lockett
|
G | 17 | 8.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 28.6 | 87.5 | - | 38.2 | 29.2 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG